Gujarat HC quashes Income Tax Reassessment Proceedings initiated after 4 years on Deduction Claim u/s 80IA(4)(iv)
The Gujarat High Court quashed the Income Tax reassessment proceedings initiated after 4 years on deduction claim under Section 80IA(4)(iv) of the...
![Himachal Pradesh HC sets aside Demand for Income Tax of Rs. 2.73 crores, as Company’s Account Properly Reflects Transaction [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Income-Tax-Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court-Companys-account-transactions-income-tax-TAXSCAN.jpg "Himachal Pradesh HC sets aside Demand for Income Tax of Rs. 2.73 crores, as Company’s Account Properly Reflects Transaction [Read Order]")
![No Excuse for SCN ignorance on uploaded on “View Additional Notices and Orders” tab on GST Portal: Madras HC sets aside Order on Pre-deposit Condition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Madras-high-court-Ignorance-of-SCN-Notices-and-Orders-Excuse-for-SCN-GST-portal-TAXSCAN.jpg "No Excuse for SCN ignorance on uploaded on “View Additional Notices and Orders” tab on GST Portal: Madras HC sets aside Order on Pre-deposit Condition [Read Order]")
Service Tax Demand under Work Contract Service is not Valid as assessee was not Registered for the same: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Allahabad bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) has held that service tax demand under work contract service is not valid as the assessee was not...
![Service Tax Demand under Work Contract Service is not Valid as assessee was not Registered for the same: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Work-Contract-Service-CESTAT-Allahabad-Tax-news-Service-Tax-Demand-under-Work-Contract-Service-Taxscan.jpg "Service Tax Demand under Work Contract Service is not Valid as assessee was not Registered for the same: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Transaction of Deposit by Assessee Company were Genuine: ITAT deletes Unexplained Credits u/s 68 of Income Tax Act [Read Order]
The Delhi bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) deleted unexplained credits under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as it found the deposit transactions by the Assessee Company to...
![Transaction of Deposit by Assessee Company were Genuine: ITAT deletes Unexplained Credits u/s 68 of Income Tax Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/ITAT-Income-Tax-Act-ITAT-Delhi-income-tax-news-tax-news-taxscan.jpg "Transaction of Deposit by Assessee Company were Genuine: ITAT deletes Unexplained Credits u/s 68 of Income Tax Act [Read Order]")
Taxpayer Explains Source of Capital Enhancement in balance sheet: ITAT deletes addition of 89. 7 Lakhs u/s 68 of Income Tax Act [Read Order]
The Delhi bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) deleted the addition of 89.7 Lakhs under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 after the taxpayer provided an explanation for the source...
![Taxpayer Explains Source of Capital Enhancement in balance sheet: ITAT deletes addition of 89. 7 Lakhs u/s 68 of Income Tax Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Income-Tax-Act-ITAT-Delhi-Section-68-of-the-Income-Tax-Act-TAXSCAN.jpg "Taxpayer Explains Source of Capital Enhancement in balance sheet: ITAT deletes addition of 89. 7 Lakhs u/s 68 of Income Tax Act [Read Order]")
ITR Filed without Regular Balance Sheet and Profit & Loss Account is Defective, not invalid; AO holds Responsibility for Notifying Defects: Supreme Court [Read Judgement]
The Supreme Court has asserted that Income Tax Returns ( ITRs ) filed without a regular balance sheet and profit and loss account may be deemed defective but are certainly not invalid. The decision,...
![ITR Filed without Regular Balance Sheet and Profit & Loss Account is Defective, not invalid; AO holds Responsibility for Notifying Defects: Supreme Court [Read Judgement]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/itr-income-tax-returns-supreme-court-ITR-filing-defects-Supreme-Court-ruling-on-ITR-taxscan.jpg "ITR Filed without Regular Balance Sheet and Profit & Loss Account is Defective, not invalid; AO holds Responsibility for Notifying Defects: Supreme Court [Read Judgement]")
![Disallowance u/s 14 A of Income Tax Act Cannot Exceed Exempt Income: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Income-Tax-Act-Disallowance-Exempt-Income-Delhi-High-Court-Income-Tax-TAXSCAN.jpg "Disallowance u/s 14 A of Income Tax Act Cannot Exceed Exempt Income: Delhi HC [Read Order]")