Bill of Entry not reflected in GSTR-2B
Importers can claim IGST and cess paid on their imports only after issuing the bill of entry (BoE). Hence, taxpayers must access the bill of entry on...
![No question of Absolute Confiscation or Re-Export when Goods have been cleared for Domestic Consumption: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/re-export-goods-domestic-consumption-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "No question of Absolute Confiscation or Re-Export when Goods have been cleared for Domestic Consumption: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![CBIC Rolls Out System-generated Centralized Examination Orders for BoE from 5th September [Read Circular]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/CBIC-Examination-Orders-BoE-taxscan.jpeg "CBIC Rolls Out System-generated Centralized Examination Orders for BoE from 5th September [Read Circular]")
![CBIC issues Advisory for Anonymised Escalation Mechanism (AEM) for delayed Bill of Entry under Faceless Assessment [Read Circular]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/CBIC-Anonymised-Escalation-Mechanism-AEM-Bill-of-Entry-Faceless-Assessment.jpg "CBIC issues Advisory for Anonymised Escalation Mechanism (AEM) for delayed Bill of Entry under Faceless Assessment [Read Circular]")
![DGFT clarifies Issues relating to Non-Ferrous Metal Import Monitoring System [Read Circular]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/DGFT-Non-Ferrous-Metal-Import-Monitoring-System-taxscan.jpg "DGFT clarifies Issues relating to Non-Ferrous Metal Import Monitoring System [Read Circular]")
![CESTAT allows 12% Interest on Delay in processing Refund of Pre-Deposit [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/CESTAT-Interest-Refund-Pre-Deposit-taxscan.jpeg "CESTAT allows 12% Interest on Delay in processing Refund of Pre-Deposit [Read Order]")
Mere Non-Mentioning of Words/Phrase not constitute Suppression of Material Facts: CESTAT sets aside Order confirming Differential Duty Demand [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai has held that mere non-mentioning of words or phrases does not constitute suppression of material facts and set-asides order...
![Mere Non-Mentioning of Words/Phrase not constitute Suppression of Material Facts: CESTAT sets aside Order confirming Differential Duty Demand [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Material-Facts-Duty-Demand-CESTAT-taxscan.jpeg "Mere Non-Mentioning of Words/Phrase not constitute Suppression of Material Facts: CESTAT sets aside Order confirming Differential Duty Demand [Read Order]")
Charge of Forgery on Textile reports not sustainable in the absence of Cogent Evidence: CESTAT sets aside Penalty [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal has held that the charge of forgery on textile reports is not sustainable in the absence of cogent evidence. The...
![Charge of Forgery on Textile reports not sustainable in the absence of Cogent Evidence: CESTAT sets aside Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/textile-reports-cogent-evidence-CESTAT-penalty-taxscan.jpg "Charge of Forgery on Textile reports not sustainable in the absence of Cogent Evidence: CESTAT sets aside Penalty [Read Order]")
CESTAT upholds Dept Order as Proposed Transactional Value was Expressly accepted by Importer [Read Order]
Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal New Delhi has upheld the Department order as the proposed transactional value was expressly accepted by the importer. The appellant, M/s Manvi...
![CESTAT upholds Dept Order as Proposed Transactional Value was Expressly accepted by Importer [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/CESTAT-Dept-Order-Transactional-Value-Importer-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT upholds Dept Order as Proposed Transactional Value was Expressly accepted by Importer [Read Order]")
![Period of Depreciation should extend up to Date of Payment of Duty: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/depreciation-payment-duty-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Period of Depreciation should extend up to Date of Payment of Duty: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Clerical Error in filling Bill of Entry does not attract Penalty and Confiscation under Customs Act: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ), New Delhi has held that Clerical error in filling the Bill of Entry does not attract penalty and confiscation under Customs Act. ...
![Clerical Error in filling Bill of Entry does not attract Penalty and Confiscation under Customs Act: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Clerical-Error-Bill-of-Entry-Penalty-Customs-Act-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpeg "Clerical Error in filling Bill of Entry does not attract Penalty and Confiscation under Customs Act: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Explanation given on ground of illness for Condonation on Appeal will not sustain without any Cogent Evidence: CESTAT [Read Order]
In a ruling against Mannat international, the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Delhi principal bench has held that explanation given on the ground of illness for the...
![Explanation given on ground of illness for Condonation on Appeal will not sustain without any Cogent Evidence: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Condonation-cogent-evidence-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Explanation given on ground of illness for Condonation on Appeal will not sustain without any Cogent Evidence: CESTAT [Read Order]")