Bombay High Court
Bombay High Court, Bombay HC, Mumbai High Court, High Court of Bombay
Supreme Court restricts Bombay HC's Ruling on Prevailment of Time Limit of S. 153 over S. 144C of Income Tax Act as Precedent [Read Judgement]
A Two-judge bench of Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan of Supreme Court have restricted the ruling of Bombay High Court on the...
![Relief to Universal Music India: Supreme Court dismisses SLP filed by Income Tax Department on Delay of 411 Days [Read Judgement]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Relief-to-Universal-Music-India-Supreme-Court-SLP-filed-Income-Tax-Department-on-Delay-of-411-Days-taxscan-1.jpg "Relief to Universal Music India: Supreme Court dismisses SLP filed by Income Tax Department on Delay of 411 Days [Read Judgement]")
![Write-off of Bad Debt not Asset, Clause - (a) of 4th Proviso to Section 153A(1) of Income Tax Act bars Assessment: Bombay HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Write-off-of-Bad-Debt-Debt-Asset-Income-Tax-Act-Assessment-Bombay-HC-taxscan.jpg "Write-off of Bad Debt not Asset, Clause - (a) of 4th Proviso to Section 153A(1) of Income Tax Act bars Assessment: Bombay HC [Read Order]")
![Failure to Pass Draft Assessment Order u/s 144C(1) of Income Tax Act renders Assessment as one without Jurisdiction: Bombay HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Failure-Draft-Assessment-Order-Income-Tax-Act-Assessment-Jurisdiction-Bombay-HC-TAXSCAN.jpg "Failure to Pass Draft Assessment Order u/s 144C(1) of Income Tax Act renders Assessment as one without Jurisdiction: Bombay HC [Read Order]")
Granting of License to Developer doesn’t Amount to possession within Meaning of Section 53A of TP Act, S. 2(47)(v) of Income Tax Act not applicable: Bombay HC [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court granting of license to developer doesn’t amount to possession within meaning of section 53 A of Transfer of Property Act (TP) and Section 2(47)(v) of Income Tax Act,1961...
![Granting of License to Developer doesn’t Amount to possession within Meaning of Section 53A of TP Act, S. 2(47)(v) of Income Tax Act not applicable: Bombay HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Granting-License-to-Developer-Amount-Possession-Meaning-Income-Tax-Act-Bombay-High-Court-taxscan.jpg "Granting of License to Developer doesn’t Amount to possession within Meaning of Section 53A of TP Act, S. 2(47)(v) of Income Tax Act not applicable: Bombay HC [Read Order]")
![Income Tax illegally levied must be Refunded: Bombay High Court [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Income-Tax-illegally-refunded-Income-Tax-Bombay-High-Court-taxscan.jpg "Income Tax illegally levied must be Refunded: Bombay High Court [Read Order]")
Bombay HC set aside Assessment Order u/s 148 in Absence of Evidence proving Income Escapement in Assessment [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court HC set aside an assessment order under section 148 of Income ncome Tax Act,1961 in the absence of evidence proving income escapement in assessment. Vaman Prestressing Co....
![Bombay HC set aside Assessment Order u/s 148 in Absence of Evidence proving Income Escapement in Assessment [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Bombay-High-Court-assessment-order-Absence-of-Evidence-proving-Income-Escapement-in-Assessment-taxscan.jpeg "Bombay HC set aside Assessment Order u/s 148 in Absence of Evidence proving Income Escapement in Assessment [Read Order]")
Delayed Payment on Balance Amount of Self Assessment Tax not amount to Tax Arrear under DTVSV Act: Bombay HC [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court (HC) has held that delayed payment on the balance amount of self-assessment tax does not amount to tax arrears under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act 2020 ( DTVSV Act) Pragati...
Disallowance owing to State Government Grants towards Cost of Capital Assets: Supreme Court issues Notice to Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. [Read Order]
The Supreme Court has issued notice to the respondent, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd, in an appeal preferred by the Pr. CIT with regard to the issue of disallowance owing...
![Disallowance owing to State Government Grants towards Cost of Capital Assets: Supreme Court issues Notice to Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Disallowance-owing-State-Government-Grants-Cost-Capital-Assets-Supreme-Court-issues-Notice-Maharashtra-State-Electricity-Distribution-taxscan-1.jpg "Disallowance owing to State Government Grants towards Cost of Capital Assets: Supreme Court issues Notice to Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. [Read Order]")
![Damage on account of Right to Sue is a Capital Receipt not chargeable to Tax: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Damage-account-Damage-on-account-of-Right-to-Sue-is-a-Capital-Receipt-Sue-Right-Capital-Receipt-Tax-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Damage on account of Right to Sue is a Capital Receipt not chargeable to Tax: ITAT [Read Order]")
No Retrospective Effect on Amendment  under S. 54 of Income Tax Act Restricting Investment In India: Bombay HC [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court has held that the amendment under section 54 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 has no retrospective effect on restricting investment in India as the amended provision would come into...
![No Retrospective Effect on Amendment  under S. 54 of Income Tax Act Restricting Investment In India: Bombay HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Retrospective-Effect-on-Amendment-Income-Tax-Act-Investment-In-India-Bombay-Highcourt-taxscan.jpeg "No Retrospective Effect on Amendment  under S. 54 of Income Tax Act Restricting Investment In India: Bombay HC [Read Order]")