Bombay High Court
Bombay High Court, Bombay HC, Mumbai High Court, High Court of Bombay
![Constitutional Validity of GST Provision for Place of Supply relating to Intermediary Services: Bombay HC Judges pronounces Split Views [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Constitutional-Validity-GST-Provision-Intermediary-services-Bombay-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "Constitutional Validity of GST Provision for Place of Supply relating to Intermediary Services: Bombay HC Judges pronounces Split Views [Read Order]")
Constitutional Validity of GST Provision for Place of Supply relating to Intermediary Services: Bombay HC Judges pronounces Split Views [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court judges split on the constitutional validity of GST Provision for Place of Supply relating to Intermediary services. The...
![ITAT President not empowered to Transfer Live Appeals from one bench of ITAT to other outside Headquarters: Bombay HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/ITAT-Bombay-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "ITAT President not empowered to Transfer Live Appeals from one bench of ITAT to other outside Headquarters: Bombay HC [Read Judgment]")
![Vivad Se Vishwas Act is a Beneficial Legislation, Dept cannot deny Benefit If Assessee is eligible for the Scheme: Bombay HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Vivad-Se-Vishwas-Act-Beneficial-Legislation-Assessee-Scheme-Bombay-High-Court-taxscan.jpeg "Vivad Se Vishwas Act is a Beneficial Legislation, Dept cannot deny Benefit If Assessee is eligible for the Scheme: Bombay HC [Read Order]")
![Service Tax not applicable on food served as Take Away or Parcels: Madras High Court [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Service-tax-food-served-as-take-away-or-parcels-Madras-High-Court-taxscan.jpeg "Service Tax not applicable on food served as Take Away or Parcels: Madras High Court [Read Judgment]")
Mere Writing of Order and keeping in File without serving it to Assessee would be No Order in the Eye of Law: Bombay HC [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court ruled that mere writing of order and keeping it in the file without serving it to the assessee would be no order in the eye of law. The petitioner, Greatship (India) Ltd. is...
![Mere Writing of Order and keeping in File without serving it to Assessee would be No Order in the Eye of Law: Bombay HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Mere-writing-of-order-Bombay-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "Mere Writing of Order and keeping in File without serving it to Assessee would be No Order in the Eye of Law: Bombay HC [Read Order]")
'Actual User' condition stipulated under Application Form ANF2B for Import Authorization not mandatory: Bombay HC quashes DGFT orders [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court while quashing DGFT orders ruled that the 'Actual User' condition stipulated under Application Form ANF2B for import authorization is not mandatory. The Petitioner, Shah...
![Actual User condition stipulated under Application Form ANF2B for Import Authorization not mandatory: Bombay HC quashes DGFT orders [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Actual-User-Application-Form-ANF2B-import-authorization-not-mandatory-Bombay-High-Court-DGFT-orders-Taxscan.jpeg "Actual User condition stipulated under Application Form ANF2B for Import Authorization not mandatory: Bombay HC quashes DGFT orders [Read Order]")
Bombay High Court directs Hindustan Coca-Cola to reply Show Cause cum Demand Notice alleging wrongful availment of CENVAT Credit worth 2.02cr
The Bombay High Court ordered the Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverage to reply cause-cum-demand notice alleging wrongful availment of CENVAT credit worth Rs.2.02 Crores. The Petitioner, Hindustan...
GST Department alleges Rs 44.66 cr Excise Duty Evasion against Supermax, Bombay High Court quashes Show Cause cum Demand Notice [Read Judgment]
In a major relief to Supermax Personal Care, the Bombay High Court quashed show cause cum demand notice alleging excise duty evasion. The petitioner, Supermax Personal Care Pvt. Ltd. is a company...
![GST Department alleges Rs 44.66 cr Excise Duty Evasion against Supermax, Bombay High Court quashes Show Cause cum Demand Notice [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Excise-Duty-Evasion-Supermax-GST-Department-Show-Cause-Notice-Bombay-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "GST Department alleges Rs 44.66 cr Excise Duty Evasion against Supermax, Bombay High Court quashes Show Cause cum Demand Notice [Read Judgment]")
Bombay High Court declares Notice of VAT Audit invalid as issued beyond Limitation Period of four years [Read Judgment]
The Bombay High Court declared Notice of VAT Audit invalid as issued beyond the limitation period of four years. As many as 10 petitions were filed by the firms carrying on the business of retail...
![Bombay High Court declares Notice of VAT Audit invalid as issued beyond Limitation Period of four years [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Bombay-High-Court-VAT-Audit-Taxscan.jpg "Bombay High Court declares Notice of VAT Audit invalid as issued beyond Limitation Period of four years [Read Judgment]")
Assessment order under Maharashtra VAT Act to be served manually and not through email: Bombay High Court [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court ruled that the manual Assessment order under Maharashtra VAT Act be served manually and not through email. The petitioner, Greatship (India) Ltd. is a company incorporated...
![Assessment order under Maharashtra VAT Act to be served manually and not through email: Bombay High Court [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Manual-Assessment-order-under-Maharashtra-VAT-Act-Bombay-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "Assessment order under Maharashtra VAT Act to be served manually and not through email: Bombay High Court [Read Order]")