Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
Bombay High Court
Bombay High Court, Bombay HC, Mumbai High Court, High Court of Bombay
![Large Investments in Aditya Birla Telecom through Mauritius Entity not a Colorable Device to evade Tax: Bombay HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Aditya-Birla-Telecom-Bombay-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "Large Investments in Aditya Birla Telecom through Mauritius Entity not a Colorable Device to evade Tax: Bombay HC [Read Judgment]")
Large Investments in Aditya Birla Telecom through Mauritius Entity not a Colorable Device to evade Tax: Bombay HC [Read Judgment]
The High Court of Bombay has ruled that Large investments in Aditya Birla Telecom through Mauritius Entity is not an instance of a colourable device...
![Condition for Depositing 20% Tax on pending Appeal is not Rigid One, can’t be implemented in all Cases: Bombay HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Redemption-Fine-Bombay-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "Condition for Depositing 20% Tax on pending Appeal is not Rigid One, can’t be implemented in all Cases: Bombay HC [Read Judgment]")
![Section 28(ii)(c) would not attract merely because Agreement contains the Term ‘Agency’: Bombay HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/GST-Bombay-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "Section 28(ii)(c) would not attract merely because Agreement contains the Term ‘Agency’: Bombay HC [Read Judgment]")
![Non-Competent Fee received from sale of Business Asset taxable as Long Term Capital Gain: Bombay HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Non-Compete-Fee-Taxscan.jpg "Non-Competent Fee received from sale of Business Asset taxable as Long Term Capital Gain: Bombay HC [Read Judgment]")
![Settlement Commission can’t pass Orders with Retrospective Effect: Bombay High Court [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Settlement-Commission-Bombay-High-Court.jpg "Settlement Commission can’t pass Orders with Retrospective Effect: Bombay High Court [Read Judgment]")
![Bombay HC holds in favor of Hinduja Hospital and Medical Research Centre [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Hinduja-Hospital-Bombay-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "Bombay HC holds in favor of Hinduja Hospital and Medical Research Centre [Read Judgment]")
![Bombay HC rules against Multi Commodity Exchange of India affirming Special Audit [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Multi-Commodity-Exchange-Bombay-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "Bombay HC rules against Multi Commodity Exchange of India affirming Special Audit [Read Judgment]")
Re-imbursement of Salary can’t be disallowed for Non-Deduction of Tax at Source: Bombay HC [Read Judgment]
A two-judge bench of the Bombay High Court has reiterated that the expenses in connection with the reimbursement of salary cannot be disallowed by invoking Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act,...
![Re-imbursement of Salary can’t be disallowed for Non-Deduction of Tax at Source: Bombay HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/GST-Salary-Taxscan.jpg "Re-imbursement of Salary can’t be disallowed for Non-Deduction of Tax at Source: Bombay HC [Read Judgment]")
Sale of Under-Construction Property is not Sale of Residential Property: Bombay High Court allows S. 54F Benefit [Read Judgment]
A division bench of the Bombay High Court has held that the sale of 'under construction property' cannot be regarded as the sale of residential unit fo0r the purpose of denying the benefit of...
![Sale of Under-Construction Property is not Sale of Residential Property: Bombay High Court allows S. 54F Benefit [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Granting-Refunds-Bombay-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "Sale of Under-Construction Property is not Sale of Residential Property: Bombay High Court allows S. 54F Benefit [Read Judgment]")