Bombay High Court
Bombay High Court, Bombay HC, Mumbai High Court, High Court of Bombay
![Section 28(ii)(c) would not attract merely because Agreement contains the Term ‘Agency’: Bombay HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/GST-Bombay-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "Section 28(ii)(c) would not attract merely because Agreement contains the Term ‘Agency’: Bombay HC [Read Judgment]")
Section 28(ii)(c) would not attract merely because Agreement contains the Term ‘Agency’: Bombay HC [Read Judgment]
A two-judge bench of the Bombay High Court has held that mere reference of the term 'agency' in the agreement itself is not conclusive of the...
![Non-Competent Fee received from sale of Business Asset taxable as Long Term Capital Gain: Bombay HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Non-Compete-Fee-Taxscan.jpg "Non-Competent Fee received from sale of Business Asset taxable as Long Term Capital Gain: Bombay HC [Read Judgment]")
![Settlement Commission can’t pass Orders with Retrospective Effect: Bombay High Court [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Settlement-Commission-Bombay-High-Court.jpg "Settlement Commission can’t pass Orders with Retrospective Effect: Bombay High Court [Read Judgment]")
![Bombay HC holds in favor of Hinduja Hospital and Medical Research Centre [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Hinduja-Hospital-Bombay-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "Bombay HC holds in favor of Hinduja Hospital and Medical Research Centre [Read Judgment]")
![Bombay HC rules against Multi Commodity Exchange of India affirming Special Audit [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Multi-Commodity-Exchange-Bombay-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "Bombay HC rules against Multi Commodity Exchange of India affirming Special Audit [Read Judgment]")
![Redemption Fine not allowable as Business Expenditure: Bombay High Court [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Redemption-Fine-Bombay-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "Redemption Fine not allowable as Business Expenditure: Bombay High Court [Read Judgment]")
Re-imbursement of Salary can’t be disallowed for Non-Deduction of Tax at Source: Bombay HC [Read Judgment]
A two-judge bench of the Bombay High Court has reiterated that the expenses in connection with the reimbursement of salary cannot be disallowed by invoking Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act,...
![Re-imbursement of Salary can’t be disallowed for Non-Deduction of Tax at Source: Bombay HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/GST-Salary-Taxscan.jpg "Re-imbursement of Salary can’t be disallowed for Non-Deduction of Tax at Source: Bombay HC [Read Judgment]")
Sale of Under-Construction Property is not Sale of Residential Property: Bombay High Court allows S. 54F Benefit [Read Judgment]
A division bench of the Bombay High Court has held that the sale of 'under construction property' cannot be regarded as the sale of residential unit fo0r the purpose of denying the benefit of...
![Sale of Under-Construction Property is not Sale of Residential Property: Bombay High Court allows S. 54F Benefit [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Granting-Refunds-Bombay-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "Sale of Under-Construction Property is not Sale of Residential Property: Bombay High Court allows S. 54F Benefit [Read Judgment]")
Mere Holding Shares for a Short Period won’t constitute Business Income: Bombay High Court [Read Judgment]
A two-judge bench of the Bombay High Court has held that the holding of shares for a short period only will not convert capital gain into business income. Justices M S Sanklecha and Akil Kureshi have...
![Mere Holding Shares for a Short Period won’t constitute Business Income: Bombay High Court [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Shirdi-Trust-Taxscan.jpg "Mere Holding Shares for a Short Period won’t constitute Business Income: Bombay High Court [Read Judgment]")
Sale / Lease of the Multi-Functional Printers Subject to 12.5% Tax under MVAT Act: Bombay HC [Read Judgment]
The Bombay High Court in the case of Ricoh India Ltd. Â v. State of Maharashtra held that the rate of tax applicable on the sale/lease of the multi-functional printers would be 12.5% as opposed to 4%...
![Sale / Lease of the Multi-Functional Printers Subject to 12.5% Tax under MVAT Act: Bombay HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Multi-Functional-Printers-Taxscan.jpg "Sale / Lease of the Multi-Functional Printers Subject to 12.5% Tax under MVAT Act: Bombay HC [Read Judgment]")