![Co-Accused Statements u/s 50 of PMLA Not Substantive Evidence, To Be Tested During Trial Not Bail Stage: Calcutta HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Co-Accused-Statements-us-50-of-PMLA-Substantive-Evidence-Bail-Calcutta-HC-TAXSCAN.jpg "Co-Accused Statements u/s 50 of PMLA Not Substantive Evidence, To Be Tested During Trial Not Bail Stage: Calcutta HC [Read Order]")
Co-Accused Statements u/s 50 of PMLA Not Substantive Evidence, To Be Tested During Trial Not Bail Stage: Calcutta HC [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Calcutta High Court held that statements made by co-accused under Section 50 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)...
![Challenge on Non-Compliance of Formalities of Taking Approval of Specified Authority u/s 151(ii) of Income Tax Act: Calcutta HC dismisses Petition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Income-Tax-Income-Tax-Act-Calcutta-HC-Non-Compliance-Approval-of-Specified-Authority-calcutta-hc-news-Petition-Calcutta-HC-Dismisses-Petition-taxscan.jpg "Challenge on Non-Compliance of Formalities of Taking Approval of Specified Authority u/s 151(ii) of Income Tax Act: Calcutta HC dismisses Petition [Read Order]")
![Calcutta HC Upholds CESTAT ruling: Service Tax Not Applicable to Mining Services Prior to June 1, 2007 [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Calcutta-HC-CESTAT-CESTAT-ruling-Service-Tax-Mining-Services-Calcutta-HC-Upholds-CESTAT-ruling-calcutta-hc-on-cestat-ruling-calcutta-hc-news-cestat-ruling-news-service-tax-news-tax-news-taxscan.jpg "Calcutta HC Upholds CESTAT ruling: Service Tax Not Applicable to Mining Services Prior to June 1, 2007 [Read Order]")
![Calcutta High Court Dismisses CESTAT Appeal Due to Monetary Limit [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/calcutta-hc-cestat-CESTAT-Appeal-Monetary-Limit-calcutta-about-CESTAT-Appeal-calcutta-hc-news-cestat-news-cestat-appeal-news-calcutta-about-cestat-tax-news-taxscan.webp "Calcutta High Court Dismisses CESTAT Appeal Due to Monetary Limit [Read Order]")
ITC Mismatch in Annual Return filed in GSTR-9 due to Unintentional Error: Calcutta HC directs fresh Adjudication owing to Revenue Neutrality [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Calcutta High Court directed fresh adjudication on the matter of mismatch in annual return filed in GSTR -9 due to Unintentional error and revenue neutrality. Ankit Kumar...
![ITC Mismatch in Annual Return filed in GSTR-9 due to Unintentional Error: Calcutta HC directs fresh Adjudication owing to Revenue Neutrality [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Mismatch-in-Annual-Return-GSTR-9-Calcutta-HC-TAXSCAN-1.jpg "ITC Mismatch in Annual Return filed in GSTR-9 due to Unintentional Error: Calcutta HC directs fresh Adjudication owing to Revenue Neutrality [Read Order]")
Reversal of ITC Confirmed due to Cancellation of GST Registration: Calcutta HC stays Demand Order [Read Order]
The Calcutta High Court stayed the demand order confirming the payment reversal of the Input Tax Credit ( ITC ) due to the cancellation of the Goods and Service Tax ( GST ) Registration of the...
![Reversal of ITC Confirmed due to Cancellation of GST Registration: Calcutta HC stays Demand Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/reversal-of-itc-cancellation-of-gst-registration-calcutta-hc-calcutta-high-court-input-tax-credit-reversal-of-input-tax-credit-demand-order-Calcutta-HC-Stays-Demand-Order-gst-news-TAXSCAN.jpg "Reversal of ITC Confirmed due to Cancellation of GST Registration: Calcutta HC stays Demand Order [Read Order]")
Relief to Vi: No TDS Deductible under Income Tax Act on Payments Received by Distributors/Franchisees From Third Parties/Customers, Rules Calcutta HC [Read Order]
In a significant case, the Calcutta High Court has held that Tax deducted at source ( TDS ) under the Income Tax Act is not deductible on payments received by distributors/franchisees from third...
![Relief to Vi: No TDS Deductible under Income Tax Act on Payments Received by Distributors/Franchisees From Third Parties/Customers, Rules Calcutta HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Vi-vodafone-idea-tds-tax-deducted-at-source-income-tax-income-tax-act-tds-deductible-under-income-tax-act-calcutta-hc-calcutta-high-court-1-1.jpg "Relief to Vi: No TDS Deductible under Income Tax Act on Payments Received by Distributors/Franchisees From Third Parties/Customers, Rules Calcutta HC [Read Order]")
38 Days delay in Filing GST Appeal due to Illness of Proprietor: Calcutta HC Directs Appellate Authority to Hear Case on Merit [Read Order]
The Calcutta High Court directed to rehear the matter of 38 days delay in filing an appeal against the assessment order under the Central Goods and Service Tax ( CGST ) Act, 2017 due to the illness...
![38 Days delay in Filing GST Appeal due to Illness of Proprietor: Calcutta HC Directs Appellate Authority to Hear Case on Merit [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Filing-GST-Appeal-Calcutta-HC-Appellate-Authority-TAXSCAN.jpg "38 Days delay in Filing GST Appeal due to Illness of Proprietor: Calcutta HC Directs Appellate Authority to Hear Case on Merit [Read Order]")
No need to Generate E-way Bill when Consignment Value does not Exceed Rs. 50,000/-: Calcutta HC sets aside GST Penalty [Read Order]
In a significant case, the Calcutta High Court set aside the penalty demanded under the Central Goods and Service Tax ( CGST ) Act,2017Â as there is no need to generate an e-way bill when the...
![No need to Generate E-way Bill when Consignment Value does not Exceed Rs. 50,000/-: Calcutta HC sets aside GST Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Generate-E-way-Bill-Calcutta-HC-GST-Penalty-TAXSCAN.jpg "No need to Generate E-way Bill when Consignment Value does not Exceed Rs. 50,000/-: Calcutta HC sets aside GST Penalty [Read Order]")
Writ Courts Does Not Act as Expertise on Classification of product under Customs Tariff Act: Calcutta HC Dismiss Petition [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Calcutta High Court observed that writ courts do not act as an expertise in scrutinising on the classification of products under the Customs Tariff Act and dismissed the Writ...
![Writ Courts Does Not Act as Expertise on Classification of product under Customs Tariff Act: Calcutta HC Dismiss Petition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Writ-Courts-Expertise-on-Classification-of-product-Customs-Tariff-Act-Calcutta-HC-Petition-TAXSCAN.jpg "Writ Courts Does Not Act as Expertise on Classification of product under Customs Tariff Act: Calcutta HC Dismiss Petition [Read Order]")
Restriction by S. 212(6) of Companies Act not applicable When accused Co-operate with investigation: Calcutta HC upholds Bail under PMLA [Read Order]
The Calcutta High Court (HC) held that the restrictions by section 212(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 is not applicable when the accused cooperates with the investigation and upholds the bail under...
