![GST Appeal rejected on Ground that it does not have Competence to Condone Delay beyond One Month: Calcutta HC restores matter for Hearing [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/GST-Calcutta-High-Court-GST-Appeal-Goods-and-Service-tax-Calcutta-HC-TAXSCAN.jpg "GST Appeal rejected on Ground that it does not have Competence to Condone Delay beyond One Month: Calcutta HC restores matter for Hearing [Read Order]")
GST Appeal rejected on Ground that it does not have Competence to Condone Delay beyond One Month: Calcutta HC restores matter for Hearing [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Calcutta High Court restored the matter for hearing as the Goods and Service tax ( GST ) appellate authority rejected...
![Mismatch in GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B is on account of a mistake: Calcutta HC dismiss Petition as Withdrawn for Rectification [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/WhatsApp-Image-2024-06-22-at-1.39.02-PM.jpeg "Mismatch in GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B is on account of a mistake: Calcutta HC dismiss Petition as Withdrawn for Rectification [Read Order]")
![Calcutta HC dismiss Writ Petition on Availability of Appeal under Income Tax Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/calcutta-high-court-Income-Tax-Act-Calcutta-HC-Dismiss-Writ-Petition-income-tax-news-taxscan.jpg "Calcutta HC dismiss Writ Petition on Availability of Appeal under Income Tax Act [Read Order]")
Failure to make Proper Enquiry on Bogus Claim of LTCG by Sale of Shares: Calcutta HC upholds Revision Order [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Calcutta High Court has upheld the revision order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax ( PCIT ) under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court found that...
Corporate Entity Starts in Clean State on Rejuvenation on Approval of Resolution Plan by NCLT: Calcutta HC [Read Order]
The Calcutta High Court held that after the insolvency proceeding is over and the resolution plan is duly approved by the National Company Law Tribunal ( NCLT ), the corporate entity starts with a...
Prejudice is caused to Taxpayers Rights when GSTR-9 is ignored when Errors committed are Revenue: Calcutta HC [Read Order]
In a recent decision the Calcutta High Court observed that ignorance of GSTR-9 by the Revenu authorities causes prejudice to taxpayers's rights when errors committed are revenue neutral. The...
![Prejudice is caused to Taxpayers Rights when GSTR-9 is ignored when Errors committed are Revenue: Calcutta HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Prejudice-Taxpayers-GSTR-9-Errors-Revenue-Calcutta-HC-taxscan.jpg "Prejudice is caused to Taxpayers Rights when GSTR-9 is ignored when Errors committed are Revenue: Calcutta HC [Read Order]")
IGST Credit used for CGST & SGST Payments Leads Tax flow to West Bengal: Calcutta HC sets aside AO passed under WBGST Act [Read Order]
The Calcutta High Court has set aside the GST (Goods and Services Tax) Assessment Order passed under the West Bengal GST Act. The court noted that the IGST credit was utilised by the assessee for the...
![IGST Credit used for CGST & SGST Payments Leads Tax flow to West Bengal: Calcutta HC sets aside AO passed under WBGST Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/site-img.jpg "IGST Credit used for CGST & SGST Payments Leads Tax flow to West Bengal: Calcutta HC sets aside AO passed under WBGST Act [Read Order]")
CBDT letter violating Plain And Unambiguous Provision of Income Tax Act and Finance Act not Valid: Calcutta HC dismisses Writ Appeal [Read Order]
The Calcutta High Court has held that the letter by the joint secretary of CBDT cannot override the plain and unambiguous provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and the Finance Act. It was observed...
![CBDT letter violating Plain And Unambiguous Provision of Income Tax Act and Finance Act not Valid: Calcutta HC dismisses Writ Appeal [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Calcutta-High-Court-invalid-CBDT-letter-Finance-Act-violation-Income-tax-violation-taxscan.jpg "CBDT letter violating Plain And Unambiguous Provision of Income Tax Act and Finance Act not Valid: Calcutta HC dismisses Writ Appeal [Read Order]")
Retraction after a period of 3 Years and 9 Months cannot be Allowed: Calcutta HC upholds Order of Excise Commissioner [Read Order]
The Calcutta High Court has held that the retractions after a period of 3 years and 9 months cannot be allowed and upheld the order of the Excise Commissioner of Appeals. M/S. Anurag Steel...
![Retraction after a period of 3 Years and 9 Months cannot be Allowed: Calcutta HC upholds Order of Excise Commissioner [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Calcutta-High-Court-Excise-Commissioner-of-Appeals-Excise-Retraction-taxscan.jpg "Retraction after a period of 3 Years and 9 Months cannot be Allowed: Calcutta HC upholds Order of Excise Commissioner [Read Order]")
Retracted Statement under Customs Act cannot be said to be Involuntary in Absence of Examination of Court: Calcutta HC [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Calcutta High Court has held that a retracted statement under the Customs Act, 1962 cannot be said to be involuntary in the absence of examination of court. The court held that...
![Retracted Statement under Customs Act cannot be said to be Involuntary in Absence of Examination of Court: Calcutta HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Retracted-Statement-Calcutta-High-Court-Customs-Customs-act-Customs-tribunal-taxscan.jpg "Retracted Statement under Customs Act cannot be said to be Involuntary in Absence of Examination of Court: Calcutta HC [Read Order]")