![Any Person Aggrieved as Used in S.129 A of Customs Act Not Includes Customs Dept: CESTAT Dismisses Appeal Filed by Dept [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/CESTAT-Customs-Act-Customs-Excise-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Section-129-A-of-Customs-Act-Any-Person-Aggrieved-customs-department-CESTAT-Dismisses-CESTAT-News-CESTAT-Updates-taxscan.jpg "Any Person Aggrieved as Used in S.129 A of Customs Act Not Includes Customs Dept: CESTAT Dismisses Appeal Filed by Dept [Read Order]")
"Any Person Aggrieved " as Used in S.129 A of Customs Act Not Includes Customs Dept: CESTAT Dismisses Appeal Filed by Dept [Read Order]
The Customs Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Department on observing that “Any Person Aggrieved " as used in...
![No allegation of Undue financial benefit from Importer: CESTAT deletes Penalty under Regulation 22 of CBLR [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/CESTAT-CESTAT-Bangalore-CBLR-Customs-Broker-Licensing-Regulation-CESTAT-penalty-Regulation-22-CBLR-taxscan.jpg "No allegation of Undue financial benefit from Importer: CESTAT deletes Penalty under Regulation 22 of CBLR [Read Order]")
![No violation of 10(d) and 10(n) CBLR regulations: CESTAT quashes forfeiture of security deposit and imposition of penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/CESTAT-CESTAT-Mumbai-CBLR-regulations-CBLR-Taxscan.jpg "No violation of 10(d) and 10(n) CBLR regulations: CESTAT quashes forfeiture of security deposit and imposition of penalty [Read Order]")
![Implication of Customs Brokers in Cases with Interpretation Issues: CBIC issues Important Instructions [Read Instruction]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/CBIC-Customs-Brokers-CBIC-guidelines-for-Customs-Brokers-Customs-Brokers-co-noticees-CBIC-instructions-for-Customs-taxscan.jpg "Implication of Customs Brokers in Cases with Interpretation Issues: CBIC issues Important Instructions [Read Instruction]")
CESTAT upholds Penalty for Non-Compliance with CBLR and Abatement of Illegal Exports [Read Order]
The two member bench of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ), Delhi, upheld the penalty of ₹50,000 for non-compliance with the CBLR regulations while also addressing the...
![CESTAT upholds Penalty for Non-Compliance with CBLR and Abatement of Illegal Exports [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/CBLR-CESTAT-Delhi-CBLR-regulations-illegal-exports-Customs-Tax-news-TAXSCAN.jpg "CESTAT upholds Penalty for Non-Compliance with CBLR and Abatement of Illegal Exports [Read Order]")
No CBLR Violation by Customs Broker for Misdeclaration by Importer: Delhi HC sets aside Penalty [Read Order]
In a recent ruling of Delhi High Court, the court set aside an order of CESTAT which imposed a penalty on appellant and allowed the appeal. Get a Copy of Supreme Court Judgments on GST with Free...
![CESTAT Upholds Penalty For Attempt To Export SCOMET Item Without Authorization [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/CESTAT-CESTAT-Delhi-SCOMET-CESTAT-Upholds-Penalty-Penalty-Customs-Excise-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT Upholds Penalty For Attempt To Export SCOMET Item Without Authorization [Read Order]")
Suspension of Customs Broker License Invalid under CBLR 2018: Delhi High Court sets aside CESTAT Order [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court invalidated the suspension of the Customs Broker license and set aside the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) order on the grounds that suspension...
![Suspension of Customs Broker License Invalid under CBLR 2018: Delhi High Court sets aside CESTAT Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Delhi-High-Court-CBLR-Suspension-of-Customs-Broker-License-Customs-Broker-License-Customs-Broker-TAXSCAN.jpg "Suspension of Customs Broker License Invalid under CBLR 2018: Delhi High Court sets aside CESTAT Order [Read Order]")
Failure to meet Obligations under Regulation 10 (e) CBLR: CESTAT rules partial Forfeiture of Security Deposit [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) ruled that failure to meet obligations under regulation 10 (e) of Customs Broker License Management ( CBLR )...
![Failure to meet Obligations under Regulation 10 (e) CBLR: CESTAT rules partial Forfeiture of Security Deposit [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/CESTAT-CESTAT-Mumbai-CBLR-Security-Deposit-Customs-Broker-License-Management-Customs-Excise-taxscan.jpg "Failure to meet Obligations under Regulation 10 (e) CBLR: CESTAT rules partial Forfeiture of Security Deposit [Read Order]")
Filing of Enquiry Report within 90 Days under Customs Regulation 20 (5) of CBLR, 2013 is Directory: Calcutta HC [Read Order]
The Calcutta High Court has ruled that the filing of an enquiry report within 90 days under Customs Regulation 20(5) of Customs Broker Licensing and Regulation (CBLR), 2013 was directory, not...
