![Govt Constitutes Interim Settlement Boards Under Central Excise Act [Read Notification]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Interim-Settlement-Boards-Central-Excise-Act-Ministry-of-Finance-TAXSCAN.jpg "Govt Constitutes Interim Settlement Boards Under Central Excise Act [Read Notification]")
Govt Constitutes Interim Settlement Boards Under Central Excise Act [Read Notification]
The Ministry of Finance has issued Notification No. 02/2025-Central Excise (N.T.) dated April 8, 2025, announcing the constitution of four Interim...
![Price not Sole Sale Consideration: Supreme Court axes Excise Duty Demands against BPCL [Read judgement]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Price-not-Sole-Sale-Sole-Sale-Sole-Sale-Consideration-Consideration-Supreme-Court-Excise-Duty-Excise-Duty-Demands-BPCL-taxscan.jpg "Price not Sole Sale Consideration: Supreme Court axes Excise Duty Demands against BPCL [Read judgement]")
![Value of material supplied for providing Taxable Services cannot be included in Value of Taxable services: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Value-of-material-supplied-material-supplied-providing-Taxable-Services-Taxable-Services-Value-of-Taxable-services-CESTAT-taxscan-.jpg "Value of material supplied for providing Taxable Services cannot be included in Value of Taxable services: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Chettinad Cement Fails to Prove Chettinad Builders is an Associate, Not a Related Party: CESTAT upholds Excise Duty Recalculation [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) ruled that Chettinad Builders Private Limited ( CBPL ) was a "related party" as the appellant failed to prove...
![Chettinad Cement Fails to Prove Chettinad Builders is an Associate, Not a Related Party: CESTAT upholds Excise Duty Recalculation [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/CESTAT-CESTAT-Chennai-Customs-Excise-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Chettinad-Cement-TAXSCAN.jpg "Chettinad Cement Fails to Prove Chettinad Builders is an Associate, Not a Related Party: CESTAT upholds Excise Duty Recalculation [Read Order]")
CESTAT orders Cross-examination of Material Evidence u/s 9D of Central Excise Act in alleged Fake Invoices case [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Chandigarh bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) directed a re-trial in the CENVAT credit case involving alleged fake invoices and misuse...
![CESTAT orders Cross-examination of Material Evidence u/s 9D of Central Excise Act in alleged Fake Invoices case [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/CESTAT-CESTAT-Chandigarh-Customs-Fake-Invoices-case-under-Central-Excise-Act-TAXSCAN.jpg "CESTAT orders Cross-examination of Material Evidence u/s 9D of Central Excise Act in alleged Fake Invoices case [Read Order]")
Penalty On Co-Noticee not Sustainable on Settlement of Main Noticee Case Under SVLDRS: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that penalty on co-noticee not sustainable on settlement of case of main noticee under Sabka Vishwas –...
![Penalty On Co-Noticee not Sustainable on Settlement of Main Noticee Case Under SVLDRS: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/CESTAT-CESTAT-Ahmedabad-Under-SVLDRS-SVLDRS-Penalty-On-Co-Noticee-Co-Noticee-Noticee-Case-Main-Noticee-Case-Customs-taxscan.jpg "Penalty On Co-Noticee not Sustainable on Settlement of Main Noticee Case Under SVLDRS: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Proceedings u/s 11A of Central Excise Act cannot be Initiated in Absence of any Deliberate or Willful Suppression: Gauhati HC [Read Order]
The Gauhati High Court held that proceedings under section 11A of Central Excise Act, 1944 cannot be initiated in absence of any deliberate or willful suppression or mis-statement of facts by the...
![Proceedings u/s 11A of Central Excise Act cannot be Initiated in Absence of any Deliberate or Willful Suppression: Gauhati HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Excise-Central-Excise-Central-Excise-Act-Gauhati-High-Court-TAXSCAN.jpg "Proceedings u/s 11A of Central Excise Act cannot be Initiated in Absence of any Deliberate or Willful Suppression: Gauhati HC [Read Order]")
Discount Given under Central Excise Act cannot Be Treated as Additional Consideration: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) in a recent case has held that the discount given under Central Excise Act, 1944 cannot be treated as additional...
![Discount Given under Central Excise Act cannot Be Treated as Additional Consideration: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/CESTAT-CESTAT-CESTAT-Customs-Excise-and-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Discount-Given-Central-Excise-Act-Additional-Consideration-CESTAT-news-CESTAT-updates-taxscan.jpg "Discount Given under Central Excise Act cannot Be Treated as Additional Consideration: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Calcutta HC directs Commissioner of CGST to File Affidavit to decide on Validity of Circular Issued by CBIC [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Calcutta High Court directed the Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax ( CGST ) to file affidavit to decide on validity of Circular issued by Central Board...
![Calcutta HC directs Commissioner of CGST to File Affidavit to decide on Validity of Circular Issued by CBIC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Goods-and-Service-Tax-Filing-Affidavit-Indirect-Taxes-TAXSCAN.jpg "Calcutta HC directs Commissioner of CGST to File Affidavit to decide on Validity of Circular Issued by CBIC [Read Order]")