![Inclusion of Subsidy Amount in Transaction Value in Terms of Section 4(3)(d) of Central Excise Act is a matter of Interpretation of Law: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Subsidy-Amount-Transaction-Value-Central-Excise-Act-Central-Excise-Central-Excise-Act-is-a-matter-of-Interpretation-of-Law-Interpretation-of-Law-Law-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Inclusion of Subsidy Amount in Transaction Value in Terms of Section 4(3)(d) of Central Excise Act is a matter of Interpretation of Law: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Inclusion of Subsidy Amount in Transaction Value in Terms of Section 4(3)(d) of Central Excise Act is a matter of Interpretation of Law: CESTAT [Read Order]
In a recent judgment, the New Delhi bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)has held that inclusion of subsidy...
![Pre-deposit of 7.5% of disputed Demand Duty is Mandatory to file appeal u/s 35-G of Central Excise Act: Allahabad HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Pre-deposit-Demand-Duty-appeal-Central-Excise-Act-Allahabad-High-Court-taxscan.jpg "Pre-deposit of 7.5% of disputed Demand Duty is Mandatory to file appeal u/s 35-G of Central Excise Act: Allahabad HC [Read Order]")
![No Business Interest Found on Buyer and Seller to term ‘Sales to Related Person’: SC Set asides CESTAT [Read Judgement]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Business-Interest-Buyer-Seller-Sales-Supremecourt-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "No Business Interest Found on Buyer and Seller to term ‘Sales to Related Person’: SC Set asides CESTAT [Read Judgement]")
![Demand of Entire Delayed Payment in Cash Rule 8 (3A) of Central Excise Rule is not valid: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Demand-Payment-Delayed-Payment-Cash-Central-Excise-Rule-CESTAT-Customs-Excise-Service-Tax-Taxscan.jpg "Demand of Entire Delayed Payment in Cash Rule 8 (3A) of Central Excise Rule is not valid: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Rejecting value at which Goods were Sold by Treating Assessee as Related Person u/s 4(4)(c) of Excise Act in absence of proper Test is Erroneous: SC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Goods-Sold-Assessee-Related-Person-Excise-Act-Test-is-Erroneous-SC-Supreme-Court-Taxscan.jpg "Rejecting value at which Goods were Sold by Treating Assessee as Related Person u/s 4(4)(c) of Excise Act in absence of proper Test is Erroneous: SC [Read Order]")
Subsidy received from State Government as Sales Tax Challan not to be included in Transaction Value for levy of Central Excise Duty u/s 4 of Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]
The New Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), ruled that the subsidy received from State Government as Sales Tax Challan not to be included in transaction...
![Subsidy received from State Government as Sales Tax Challan not to be included in Transaction Value for levy of Central Excise Duty u/s 4 of Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Subsidy-State-Government-Sales-Tax-Challan-Transaction-Value-Central-Excise-Duty-levy-of-Central-Excise-Duty-Central-Excise-Act-CESTAT-Excise-Customs-Service-Tax-Taxscan-.jpg "Subsidy received from State Government as Sales Tax Challan not to be included in Transaction Value for levy of Central Excise Duty u/s 4 of Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Jharkhand HC Orders to Pay Mandatory Pre-deposit under 35F of Central Excise Act for an Appeal Hearing [Read Order]
The Jharkhand High Court in its recent judgement ordered to pay a mandatory pre-deposit under 35F of the Central Excise Act for the appeal hearing. Amar Enterprises, the Petitioner is registered...
![Jharkhand HC Orders to Pay Mandatory Pre-deposit under 35F of Central Excise Act for an Appeal Hearing [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Jharkhand-High-Court-Orders-Pay-Mandatory-Pre-deposit-Pre-deposit-Central-Excise-Act-Appeal-Hearing-Taxscan.jpg "Jharkhand HC Orders to Pay Mandatory Pre-deposit under 35F of Central Excise Act for an Appeal Hearing [Read Order]")
Central Excise Act and Rules do not Contemplate Extension of Time beyond Limitation: Rajasthan HC dismisses Refund Application [Read Order]
The Rajasthan High Court dismissed refund application and observed that Central Excise Act and Rules do not Contemplate Extension of Time beyond the period of limitation. The writ petitions have...
![Central Excise Act and Rules do not Contemplate Extension of Time beyond Limitation: Rajasthan HC dismisses Refund Application [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Central-Excise-Act-and-Rules-Contemplate-Extension-Limitation-Rajasthan-HC-Refund-Application-TAXSCAN.jpg "Central Excise Act and Rules do not Contemplate Extension of Time beyond Limitation: Rajasthan HC dismisses Refund Application [Read Order]")
No Interest demand in absence of Condition precedent u/s 11AA of Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]
The New Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) ruled that no interest demand can be made in absence of condition precedent under Section 11AA of Central...
![No Interest demand in absence of Condition precedent u/s 11AA of Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Interest-demand-Interest-demand-Central-Excise-Act-Central-Excise-Excise-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "No Interest demand in absence of Condition precedent u/s 11AA of Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]")
CESTAT confirms Composite Penalty When Charges pertain to period prior to and after introduction of Section 11 AC of Central Excise Act [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), confirmed composite penalty when charges pertained to period prior to and after introduction of Section 11 AC...
![CESTAT confirms Composite Penalty When Charges pertain to period prior to and after introduction of Section 11 AC of Central Excise Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/CESTAT-Penalty-pertain-period-Central-Excise-Act-TAXSCAN.jpg "CESTAT confirms Composite Penalty When Charges pertain to period prior to and after introduction of Section 11 AC of Central Excise Act [Read Order]")
Penalty u/s 96ZP of Excise Act not justifiable when Revenue Department delayed Computation of ACP: Orissa HC [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Orissa High Court (HC) held that the penalty under section 96ZP of the Central Excise Act was not justifiable when Revenue Department delayed the computation of the Annual...
![Penalty u/s 96ZP of Excise Act not justifiable when Revenue Department delayed Computation of ACP: Orissa HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Penalty-Excise-Act-Revenue-Department-ACP-Orissa-HC-TAXSCAN.jpg "Penalty u/s 96ZP of Excise Act not justifiable when Revenue Department delayed Computation of ACP: Orissa HC [Read Order]")