![Lead Acid Batteries Supplied to Individual Customers to be Valued u/s 4A of Central Excise Act: CESTAT Upholds Recovery of Interest [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Lead-Acid-Batteries-Supplied-to-Individual-Customers-to-be-Valued-Central-Excise-Act-CESTAT-Upholds-Recovery-of-Interest-TAXSCAN.jpg "Lead Acid Batteries Supplied to Individual Customers to be Valued u/s 4A of Central Excise Act: CESTAT Upholds Recovery of Interest [Read Order]")
Lead Acid Batteries Supplied to Individual Customers to be Valued u/s 4A of Central Excise Act: CESTAT Upholds Recovery of Interest [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), upheld recovery of interest and ruled that Lead Acid...
![Larger Period of Limitation u/s 11A(1) of Central Excise Act Could Not be Proceed Unless Holder for valuable consideration Shown to be Party to Fraud: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Larger-Period-of-Limitation-Central-Excise-Act-Holder-for-valuable-consideration-excise-customs-service-tax-taxscan.jpg "Larger Period of Limitation u/s 11A(1) of Central Excise Act Could Not be Proceed Unless Holder for valuable consideration Shown to be Party to Fraud: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Claim for Refund, even where Tax has been Paid under Mistake of Service Tax Law to be Decided upon u/s 11B of Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Claim-for-Refund-Tax-Mistake-of-Service-Tax-Law-Central-Excise-Act-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg "Claim for Refund, even where Tax has been Paid under Mistake of Service Tax Law to be Decided upon u/s 11B of Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![No requirement to follow Procedure under Rule 4A of Service Tax Rules in Absence of Head Office-Branch Office Basis: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/CESTAT-Service-Tax-Rules-Banking-charges-Invoice-Service-Tax-Input-service-distributor-excise-customs-taxscan.jpg "No requirement to follow Procedure under Rule 4A of Service Tax Rules in Absence of Head Office-Branch Office Basis: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![CESTAT Upholds Assessment of CVD on Basis of Retail Sale Price for Prepared Glues and Other Prepared Adhesives [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/CESTAT-Assessment-of-CVD-Basis-of-Retail-Sale-Price-Prepared-Glues-and-Other-Prepared-Adhesives-sales-price-retail-sales-price-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT Upholds Assessment of CVD on Basis of Retail Sale Price for Prepared Glues and Other Prepared Adhesives [Read Order]")
CESTAT upholds Rejection of Service Tax Refund Claim Filed Beyond Time Limit u/s 11B Central Excise Act [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), upheld the rejection of service tax refund claim filed beyond time limit under Section 11B of the Central Excise...
![CESTAT upholds Rejection of Service Tax Refund Claim Filed Beyond Time Limit u/s 11B Central Excise Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/CESTAT-CESTAT-upholds-Rejection-of-Service-Tax-Refund-Service-Tax-Refund-Service-Tax-Refund-Claim-Time-Limit-Central-Excise-Act-Customs-Excise-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT upholds Rejection of Service Tax Refund Claim Filed Beyond Time Limit u/s 11B Central Excise Act [Read Order]")
Audit on Selected Basis Undermines Purpose of Departmental Audit: CESTAT quashes Customs Duty Demand [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) quashed customs duty demand and observed that the audit on selected basis undermines purpose of departmental...
![Audit on Selected Basis Undermines Purpose of Departmental Audit: CESTAT quashes Customs Duty Demand [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Audit-on-Selected-Basis-Undermines-Purpose-of-Departmental-Audit-CESTAT-quashes-Customs-Duty-Demand-TAXSCAN.jpg "Audit on Selected Basis Undermines Purpose of Departmental Audit: CESTAT quashes Customs Duty Demand [Read Order]")
Inclusion of Subsidy Amount in Transaction Value in Terms of Section 4(3)(d) of Central Excise Act is a matter of Interpretation of Law: CESTAT [Read Order]
In a recent judgment, the New Delhi bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)has held that inclusion of subsidy amount in transaction value in terms of section 4(3)(d)...
![Inclusion of Subsidy Amount in Transaction Value in Terms of Section 4(3)(d) of Central Excise Act is a matter of Interpretation of Law: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Subsidy-Amount-Transaction-Value-Central-Excise-Act-Central-Excise-Central-Excise-Act-is-a-matter-of-Interpretation-of-Law-Interpretation-of-Law-Law-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Inclusion of Subsidy Amount in Transaction Value in Terms of Section 4(3)(d) of Central Excise Act is a matter of Interpretation of Law: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Pre-deposit of 7.5% of disputed Demand Duty is Mandatory to file appeal u/s 35-G of Central Excise Act: Allahabad HC [Read Order]
In a recent judgement, the Allahabad High Court (HC) held that pre-deposit of 7.5% of disputed demand duty is mandatory to file an appeal under section 35-G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 Sri...
![Pre-deposit of 7.5% of disputed Demand Duty is Mandatory to file appeal u/s 35-G of Central Excise Act: Allahabad HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Pre-deposit-Demand-Duty-appeal-Central-Excise-Act-Allahabad-High-Court-taxscan.jpg "Pre-deposit of 7.5% of disputed Demand Duty is Mandatory to file appeal u/s 35-G of Central Excise Act: Allahabad HC [Read Order]")
No Business Interest Found on Buyer and Seller to term ‘Sales to Related Person’: SC Set asides CESTAT [Read Judgement]
When determining who is the "Related Party" under the Central Excise Act for the purpose of valuation, the Supreme Court, presided over by Justices S. Ravindra Bhat and Dipankar Datta, held that the...
![No Business Interest Found on Buyer and Seller to term ‘Sales to Related Person’: SC Set asides CESTAT [Read Judgement]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Business-Interest-Buyer-Seller-Sales-Supremecourt-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "No Business Interest Found on Buyer and Seller to term ‘Sales to Related Person’: SC Set asides CESTAT [Read Judgement]")
Demand of Entire Delayed Payment in Cash Rule 8 (3A) of Central Excise Rule is not valid: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) the demand for entire delayed payment in cash Rule 8 (3A) of Central Excise Rule, 2002 is not valid. ...
![Demand of Entire Delayed Payment in Cash Rule 8 (3A) of Central Excise Rule is not valid: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Demand-Payment-Delayed-Payment-Cash-Central-Excise-Rule-CESTAT-Customs-Excise-Service-Tax-Taxscan.jpg "Demand of Entire Delayed Payment in Cash Rule 8 (3A) of Central Excise Rule is not valid: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Rejecting value at which Goods were Sold by Treating Assessee as Related Person u/s 4(4)(c) of Excise Act in absence of proper Test is Erroneous: SC [Read Order]
The Supreme Court (SC) has held that rejecting the value at which goods were sold by treating assessee as related person under section 4(4)(c) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 in absence of proper...
![Rejecting value at which Goods were Sold by Treating Assessee as Related Person u/s 4(4)(c) of Excise Act in absence of proper Test is Erroneous: SC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Goods-Sold-Assessee-Related-Person-Excise-Act-Test-is-Erroneous-SC-Supreme-Court-Taxscan.jpg "Rejecting value at which Goods were Sold by Treating Assessee as Related Person u/s 4(4)(c) of Excise Act in absence of proper Test is Erroneous: SC [Read Order]")