![Rule 8(3A) of Central Excise Rules 2002 is Ultravires: CESTAT Orders Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Central-Excise-Rules-2002-CESTAT-Orders-Fresh-Adjudication-Fresh-Adjudication-Orders-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Rule 8(3A) of Central Excise Rules 2002 is Ultravires: CESTAT Orders Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]")
Rule 8(3A) of Central Excise Rules 2002 is Ultravires: CESTAT Orders Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), ordered fresh adjudication and observed that Rule 8(3A) of...
![Goods used as Input Should be Duty Paid for Availing MODVAT credit u/s 57A of Central Excise Rules : CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Modified-value-added-tax-credit-service-tax-Goods-Inputs-Section-57A-of-Central-Excise-Rules-1944-CESTAT-central-excise-rules-MODVAT-taxscan.jpg "Goods used as Input Should be Duty Paid for Availing MODVAT credit u/s 57A of Central Excise Rules : CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Penal Provision of Central Excise Rules not to be Invoked against Company Accountants: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Penal-Provision-Penal-Provision-of-Central-Excise-Rules-Excise-Rules-Company-Accountants-service-tax-CESTAT-Customs-Excise-taxscan.jpg "Penal Provision of Central Excise Rules not to be Invoked against Company Accountants: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Rule 96ZP of Central Excise Rules,1944 declared as Ultra Vires by Supreme Court: CESTAT deletes Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Central-Excise-Rules-1944-Central-Excise-Rules-Rule-96ZP-of-Central-Excise-Rules-1944-declared-as-Ultra-Vires-by-Supreme-Court-CESTAT-deletes-Penalty-Supreme-Court-CESTAT-Penalty-Taxscan.jpg "Rule 96ZP of Central Excise Rules,1944 declared as Ultra Vires by Supreme Court: CESTAT deletes Penalty [Read Order]")
![CESTAT quashes Excise Duty Demand, invalidates Restriction on Cenvat Credit Utilization during Default [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/CESTAT-CESTAT-Kolkata-Excise-Duty-Cenvat-credit-Central-Excise-Rules-Taxscan.jpg "CESTAT quashes Excise Duty Demand, invalidates Restriction on Cenvat Credit Utilization during Default [Read Order]")
Relief to Royal Enfield, Unjust enrichment did not apply to Refund arising out of Finalisation of Provisional Assessment: CESTAT [Read Order]
In a significant case of M/s.Royal Enfield (Unit of M/s.Eicher Motors Ltd.), the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) of Chennai Bench has held that unjust enrichment did not...
![Relief to Royal Enfield, Unjust enrichment did not apply to Refund arising out of Finalisation of Provisional Assessment: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Royal-Enfield-enrichment-Refund-arising-Provisional-Assessment-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Relief to Royal Enfield, Unjust enrichment did not apply to Refund arising out of Finalisation of Provisional Assessment: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Transfer of Cases to call book and reviving after a long gap without any reasonable explanation is not allowable: Orissa HC [Read Order]
The Orissa High Court (HC) held that the transfer of cases to call book and reviving after a long gap without any reasonable explanation is not allowable. M/s. Maxcare Laboratories Ltd challenged...
![Transfer of Cases to call book and reviving after a long gap without any reasonable explanation is not allowable: Orissa HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Transfer-of-Cases-call-book-reasonable-explanation-Orissa-High-Court-taxscan.jpg "Transfer of Cases to call book and reviving after a long gap without any reasonable explanation is not allowable: Orissa HC [Read Order]")
![Demand for excess CENVAT Credit cant be based on Third Partys Statement: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Demand-for-excess-CENVAT-credit-third-partys-statement-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg "Demand for excess CENVAT Credit cant be based on Third Partys Statement: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Re-Export of Imported Waste Oil is not allowable as it is prohibited under the Central Excise Rule: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the re-export of Imported waste oil is not allowable as it is prohibited under the Central Excise...
![Re-Export of Imported Waste Oil is not allowable as it is prohibited under the Central Excise Rule: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Imported-Waste-Oil-Re-Export-Re-Export-of-Imported-Waste-Oil-Central-Excise-Rule-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Re-Export of Imported Waste Oil is not allowable as it is prohibited under the Central Excise Rule: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Penalty under Rule 26 Central Excise Rules cannot be imposed for issuance of bogus LR when period involved is prior to amendment: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Division Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ), ruled that penalty under Rule 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 cannot be imposed for issuance of bogus LR when...
![Penalty under Rule 26 Central Excise Rules cannot be imposed for issuance of bogus LR when period involved is prior to amendment: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Penalty-Central-Excise-Rules-Central-Excise-bogus-LR-amendment-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Penalty under Rule 26 Central Excise Rules cannot be imposed for issuance of bogus LR when period involved is prior to amendment: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Cogent Evidence is needed to establish a Charge against Clandestine Removal, No Penalty sustained under Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Delhi bench of Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that cogent evidence is needed to establish a charge against clandestine removal and no penalty sustained...
![Cogent Evidence is needed to establish a Charge against Clandestine Removal, No Penalty sustained under Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Cogent-evidence-penalty-Central-Excise-Act-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Cogent Evidence is needed to establish a Charge against Clandestine Removal, No Penalty sustained under Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Press Mud generated as a By product during Manufacture of Sugar can’t be treated as Exempted Products: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Ahmedabad bench has held that the Bagasse/ Press mud produced during the course of manufacture of sugar cannot be treated as exempted...
![Press Mud generated as a By product during Manufacture of Sugar can’t be treated as Exempted Products: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Press-Mud-product-Sugar-Exempted-Products-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Press Mud generated as a By product during Manufacture of Sugar can’t be treated as Exempted Products: CESTAT [Read Order]")