![Mifex Oral Suspension, Sancal Vert Forete are Classifiable under Head of products of a kind used in animal feeding’: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/CESTAT-CESTAT-Mumbai-Customs-Excise-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Sancal-Vert-Forete-TAXSCAN.jpg "Mifex Oral Suspension, Sancal Vert Forete are Classifiable under Head of products of a kind used in animal feeding’: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Mifex Oral Suspension, Sancal Vert Forete are Classifiable under Head of 'products of a kind used in animal feeding’: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) has held that Mifex Oral Suspension, Sancal Vert Forete are...
![CESTAT quashes Rs.1 Crore CENVAT Credit Recovery against BHEL citing Lack Of Recovery Mechanism during 2006 - 2009 [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/CESTAT-Customs-Excise-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-CESTAT-ruling-on-BHEL-CENVAT-credit-TAXSCAN.jpg "CESTAT quashes Rs.1 Crore CENVAT Credit Recovery against BHEL citing Lack Of Recovery Mechanism during 2006 - 2009 [Read Order]")
![Issue on Penalties u/s 11AC of Central Excise Act Fails to decide based on decision by Supreme Court on same issue: CESTAT directs Re adjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/CESTAT-CESTAT-Mumbai-Central-Excise-Act-Supreme-Court-Customs-and-Excise-section-11AC-of-Central-Excise-Act-taxscan.jpg "Issue on Penalties u/s 11AC of Central Excise Act Fails to decide based on decision by Supreme Court on same issue: CESTAT directs Re adjudication [Read Order]")
![Manufactured LSHS Captively Consumed for Electricity Generation: CESTAT quashes Excise Duty Demand against IOCL Ltd [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/CESTAT-CESTAT-Kolkata-indian-oil-corporation-limited-TAXSCAN.jpg "Manufactured LSHS Captively Consumed for Electricity Generation: CESTAT quashes Excise Duty Demand against IOCL Ltd [Read Order]")
![CESTAT allows CENVAT credit on Service Tax for Bus Transportation utilized for pickup and drop of employees [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/CESTAT-CESTAT-Mumbai-CENVAT-credit-Service-Tax-Service-Tax-for-Bus-Transportation-drop-of-employees-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT allows CENVAT credit on Service Tax for Bus Transportation utilized for pickup and drop of employees [Read Order]")
Relief to Parle Products: CESTAT rules Cheeselings is Classifiable as 'Namkeen', Exempted from Excise Duty [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) has ruled in favour of M/s Parle Products Pvt Ltd, declaring that their product, ‘Cheeselings,’ should be...
![Relief to Parle Products: CESTAT rules Cheeselings is Classifiable as Namkeen, Exempted from Excise Duty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/CESTAT-Parle-Products-Relief-to-Parle-Products-Excise-Duty-Cheeselings-is-Classifiable-as-Namkeen-taxscan.jpg "Relief to Parle Products: CESTAT rules Cheeselings is Classifiable as Namkeen, Exempted from Excise Duty [Read Order]")
Trade Discount to Dealers without Benefiting Customers can’t be Abetted to Price of Goods: CESTAT dismisses Toyota Kirloskar’s Plea [Read Order]
In a recent ruling of the Bangalore Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) modified a limitation order by the Commissioner of Central Tax, allowing appeal on the...
![Trade Discount to Dealers without Benefiting Customers can’t be Abetted to Price of Goods: CESTAT dismisses Toyota Kirloskar’s Plea [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/CESTAT-CESTAT-Bangalore-Central-Tax-Commissioner-Tax-Toyota-Kirloskar-TAXSCAN.jpg "Trade Discount to Dealers without Benefiting Customers can’t be Abetted to Price of Goods: CESTAT dismisses Toyota Kirloskar’s Plea [Read Order]")
Relief to Ambuja Cement Ltd: “Purchase Price” not Inclusive of VAT, Supreme Court upholds Exclusion of VAT already Paid on Purchases [Read Judgement]
The Supreme Court ruled that the value-added tax ( VAT ) is not included in the definition of 'purchase price' under the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (GVAT), giving relief to Ambuja Cement. The...
![Relief to Ambuja Cement Ltd: “Purchase Price” not Inclusive of VAT, Supreme Court upholds Exclusion of VAT already Paid on Purchases [Read Judgement]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Relief-Ambuja-Cement-Ltd-Purchase-Price-Inclusive-VAT-Supreme-Court-Exclusion-VAT-Paid-Purchases-taxscan.jpg "Relief to Ambuja Cement Ltd: “Purchase Price” not Inclusive of VAT, Supreme Court upholds Exclusion of VAT already Paid on Purchases [Read Judgement]")
CESTAT declares Cross-Model Discount Utilisation Inadmissible, Rules in Favour of Toyota Ltd due to Time-Barred Excise Demand [Read Order]
The CESTAT ( Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ) decided that using discounts across different car models is not allowed, based on Tata Motors Ltd ruling. They sided with the revenue...
![CESTAT declares Cross-Model Discount Utilisation Inadmissible, Rules in Favour of Toyota Ltd due to Time-Barred Excise Demand [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/CESTAT-Excise-Demand-Cross-Model-Discount-Customs-Excise-and-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT declares Cross-Model Discount Utilisation Inadmissible, Rules in Favour of Toyota Ltd due to Time-Barred Excise Demand [Read Order]")
CENVAT Credit should be allowed in respect of GTA Services used for Outward Transportation: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Allahabad bench of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) ruled that Central Value Added Tax ( CENVAT ) credit should be allowed in respect of Goods Transport Agency (...
![CENVAT Credit should be allowed in respect of GTA Services used for Outward Transportation: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/CESTAT-CENVAT-CENVAT-Credit-CESTAT-Allahabad-GTA-Customs-Excise-TAXSCAN.jpg "CENVAT Credit should be allowed in respect of GTA Services used for Outward Transportation: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Process of Cutting Jumbo and Slitting does not fall under Definition of Manufacturing as per Section 2 (f) of Central Excise Tariff Act: CESTAT
The Hyderabad bench of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) ruled that the process of cutting jumbo rolls and slitting does not fall under the definition of manufacturing...
Manufacture of Display Material falls under ‘Trading Advertising Material’, attracts Nil Rate of Duty: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Bangalore Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) held that the Manufacture of display material falls under ‘Trading Advertising material’ thereby attracting...
![Manufacture of Display Material falls under ‘Trading Advertising Material’, attracts Nil Rate of Duty: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/CESTAT-Customs-Custom-excise-service-tax-appellate-tribunal-Excise-Trading-advertising-material-TAXSCAN.jpg "Manufacture of Display Material falls under ‘Trading Advertising Material’, attracts Nil Rate of Duty: CESTAT [Read Order]")