![‘Half-Hearted Investigation by DRI’: CESTAT Remands Genuineness of Manufacturing Activity Matter for Reinvestigation [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/25/500x300_2068807-dri-investigation-taxscan.webp "‘Half-Hearted Investigation by DRI’: CESTAT Remands Genuineness of Manufacturing Activity Matter for Reinvestigation [Read Order]")
‘Half-Hearted Investigation by DRI’: CESTAT Remands Genuineness of Manufacturing Activity Matter for Reinvestigation [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) remanded a case back to the adjudicating authority, holding...
![Relief for TTK Prestige: CESTAT Allows CENVAT Credit on ISD Invoices for Business Related Services [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/24/250x150_2068543-ttk-prestige-cenvat-credit-isd-invoices-taxscan.webp "Relief for TTK Prestige: CESTAT Allows CENVAT Credit on ISD Invoices for Business Related Services [Read Order]")
![Trading Not Exempted Service Before 2011: CESTAT Quashes CENVAT Credit Demand and Penalty [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/24/250x150_2068537-demand-and-penalty-cenvat-credit-taxscan.webp "Trading Not Exempted Service Before 2011: CESTAT Quashes CENVAT Credit Demand and Penalty [Read Order]")
![Denial of CENVAT Credit for Non-Manufacture Activity: CESTAT Sets Aside Order as Duty Was Paid on All Goods [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/22/250x150_2067568-cestat-mumbai-denial-of-cenvat-credit-taxscan.webp "Denial of CENVAT Credit for Non-Manufacture Activity: CESTAT Sets Aside Order as Duty Was Paid on All Goods [Read Order]")
![Relief for SAIL: CESTAT Holds By-Products Not Liable Under Rule 6 of CCR, Accepts Proportionate Reversal [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/22/250x150_2067573-cestat-kolkata-rule-6-ccr-accepts-proportionate-reversal-taxscan.webp "Relief for SAIL: CESTAT Holds By-Products Not Liable Under Rule 6 of CCR, Accepts Proportionate Reversal [Read Order]")
Relief for Hindustan Unilever: CESTAT Allows CENVAT Credit on Job Work Related Services Based on Earlier Rulings [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) allowed CENVAT credit to Hindustan Unilever Ltd. on various input services related to job work, citing earlier ...
![Relief for Hindustan Unilever: CESTAT Allows CENVAT Credit on Job Work Related Services Based on Earlier Rulings [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/21/500x300_2066821-relief-for-hindustan-unilever-hindustan-unilever-cestat-cestat-allows-cenvat-credit-taxscan.webp "Relief for Hindustan Unilever: CESTAT Allows CENVAT Credit on Job Work Related Services Based on Earlier Rulings [Read Order]")
Appeal Related to Service Taxability Must be Filed Before the Supreme Court u/s 35 of CEA: Delhi HC [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court, ruled that the appeal on service taxability must be filed before the Supreme Court under Section 35L of the Central Excise Act,1944. The Revenue-appellant had appealed...
![Appeal Related to Service Taxability Must be Filed Before the Supreme Court u/s 35 of CEA: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/18/500x300_2065157-appeal-related-to-service-taxability-service-taxability-service-tax-taxscan.webp "Appeal Related to Service Taxability Must be Filed Before the Supreme Court u/s 35 of CEA: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
Credit Reversal Dispute Based on Interpretation, Not Suppression: CESTAT Denies Extended Period [Read Order]
The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that a difference in interpretation of credit reversal provisions does not amount to suppression of...
![Credit Reversal Dispute Based on Interpretation, Not Suppression: CESTAT Denies Extended Period [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/16/500x300_2064431-credit-reversal-dispute-credit-reversal-dispute-based-on-interpretation-interpretation-taxscan.webp "Credit Reversal Dispute Based on Interpretation, Not Suppression: CESTAT Denies Extended Period [Read Order]")
![Extended Period Not Invocable when Department Previously Audited and Issued SCN: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/16/500x300_2064438-scn-cestat-department-taxscan.webp "Extended Period Not Invocable when Department Previously Audited and Issued SCN: CESTAT [Read Order]")
SCN Issued 3.5 Years After Voluntary Disclosure Without New Findings or Suppression: CESTAT quashes Extended Period Demand [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that the extended period of limitation cannot be invoked when the assessee has voluntarily disclosed duty...
![SCN Issued 3.5 Years After Voluntary Disclosure Without New Findings or Suppression: CESTAT quashes Extended Period Demand [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/16/500x300_2064427-extended-period-demand-scn-cestat-taxscan.webp "SCN Issued 3.5 Years After Voluntary Disclosure Without New Findings or Suppression: CESTAT quashes Extended Period Demand [Read Order]")
Company Reversed Wrongfully Availed CENVAT Credit with Interest and Paid Penalty: CESTAT Quashes SCN Invoking Extended Period [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that the extended period of limitation under the service tax law cannot be invoked when the assessee has...
![Company Reversed Wrongfully Availed CENVAT Credit with Interest and Paid Penalty: CESTAT Quashes SCN Invoking Extended Period [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/08/500x300_2061465-company-reversed-wrongfully-availed-cenvat-credit-company-reversed-wrongfully-availed-taxscan.webp "Company Reversed Wrongfully Availed CENVAT Credit with Interest and Paid Penalty: CESTAT Quashes SCN Invoking Extended Period [Read Order]")
No Penalty u/r 26 of Central Excise If Superintendent Revises Returns in Bona Fide Belief Without Evidence of Collusion: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that a penalty under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, cannot be imposed on a superintendent if...
![No Penalty u/r 26 of Central Excise If Superintendent Revises Returns in Bona Fide Belief Without Evidence of Collusion: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/08/500x300_2061386-no-penalty-cestat.webp "No Penalty u/r 26 of Central Excise If Superintendent Revises Returns in Bona Fide Belief Without Evidence of Collusion: CESTAT [Read Order]")