![EOU is required to Pay Excise Duty only by way of Cash and Cenvat Credit cannot be Utilized when Raw Materials/Inputs are Cleared: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/EOU-is-required-to-Pay-Excise-Duty-Pay-Excise-Duty-only-by-way-of-Cash-and-Cenvat-Credit-Excise-Duty-EOU-Raw-Materials-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg "EOU is required to Pay Excise Duty only by way of Cash and Cenvat Credit cannot be Utilized when Raw Materials/Inputs are Cleared: CESTAT [Read Order]")
EOU is required to Pay Excise Duty only by way of Cash and Cenvat Credit cannot be Utilized when Raw Materials/Inputs are Cleared: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), ruled that the Export Oriented Units (EOU) are required to...
![No evidence proves Unjust enrichment, Refund of Excess Paid Duty must be Credit to Consumer Welfare Fund: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/No-evidence-proves-Unjust-enrichment-Refund-of-Excess-Paid-Duty-must-be-Credit-to-Consumer-Welfare-Fund-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "No evidence proves Unjust enrichment, Refund of Excess Paid Duty must be Credit to Consumer Welfare Fund: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Customs Broker responsible for Act of Employee who is Misrepresenting CHB before Customs Authorities: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Customs-Broker-responsible-for-Act-of-Employee-Misrepresenting-CHB-before-Customs-Authorities-Customs-Broker-Employee-CHB-Customs-Authorities-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg "Customs Broker responsible for Act of Employee who is Misrepresenting CHB before Customs Authorities: CESTAT [Read Order]")
No Explicit Findings that CHA Abetted in Contravening Provisions of Customs Act: CESTAT quashes Revocation of Licence [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Hyderabad Bench quashed the revocation of licence as no explicit findings was made that the Customs House Agent (CHA) abetted in...
![No Explicit Findings that CHA Abetted in Contravening Provisions of Customs Act: CESTAT quashes Revocation of Licence [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/CHA-provisions-of-Customs-Act-CESTAT-Customs-Act-revocation-of-licence-licence-taxscan.jpg "No Explicit Findings that CHA Abetted in Contravening Provisions of Customs Act: CESTAT quashes Revocation of Licence [Read Order]")
![Mere Registration as NBFC not enough under Service tax for levy: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Registration-NBFC-NBFC-Registration-Service-tax-for-levy-Service-tax-CESTAT-Customs-Excise-Service-Tax-taxscan.jpg "Mere Registration as NBFC not enough under Service tax for levy: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Non-Utilised portion of Cenvat Credit cannot be Claimed as Refund in cash: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Non-Utilised-portion-of-Cenvat-Credit-Non-Utilised-portion-Cenvat-Credit-Refund-in-cash-Refund-CESTAT-Customs-Excise-Service-Tax-Taxscan.jpg "Non-Utilised portion of Cenvat Credit cannot be Claimed as Refund in cash: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Procedural Irregularities can be Ignored when there is no Apparent Loss to Revenue nor any Apparent Benefit to Assessee: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), comprising PV Subba Rao, Technical Member and Dr Rachna Gupta, Judicial Member observed that procedural...
![Procedural Irregularities can be Ignored when there is no Apparent Loss to Revenue nor any Apparent Benefit to Assessee: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Procedural-Irregularities-Apparent-Loss-Revenue-Apparent-Loss-to-Revenue-Apparent-Benefit-Benefit-Assessee-CESTAT-Customs-Excise-Service-Tax-Taxscan-.jpg "Procedural Irregularities can be Ignored when there is no Apparent Loss to Revenue nor any Apparent Benefit to Assessee: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Regular mention of utilization of amount in ER Returns: CESTAT quashes Service Tax Demand holding no wilful intent to Evade Tax [Read Order]
The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), quashed service tax demand holding no wilful intent to evade tax as there was regular mention of utilization of...
![Regular mention of utilization of amount in ER Returns: CESTAT quashes Service Tax Demand holding no wilful intent to Evade Tax [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/utilization-of-amount-ER-Returns-CESTAT-Service-Tax-demand-Evade-Tax-Evasion-of-tax-Customs-Excise-Service-Tax-Taxscan-.jpg "Regular mention of utilization of amount in ER Returns: CESTAT quashes Service Tax Demand holding no wilful intent to Evade Tax [Read Order]")
Cost of Transportation from Place of Removal to the Place of Delivery of Excisable Goods is excluded from Assessable Value: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ), observed that cost of transportation from place of removal to the place of delivery of excisable goods is...
![Cost of Transportation from Place of Removal to the Place of Delivery of Excisable Goods is excluded from Assessable Value: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Cost-of-Transportation-Place-of-Removal-Place-of-Delivery-Excisable-Goods-Assessable-Value-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg "Cost of Transportation from Place of Removal to the Place of Delivery of Excisable Goods is excluded from Assessable Value: CESTAT [Read Order]")
