![Confirmation of Service Tax Demand and Penalties: CESTAT Dismisses Appeal Due to Earlier Remand [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/service-tax-demand-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Confirmation of Service Tax Demand and Penalties: CESTAT Dismisses Appeal Due to Earlier Remand [Read Order]")
Confirmation of Service Tax Demand and Penalties: CESTAT Dismisses Appeal Due to Earlier Remand [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) dismissed appeal due to earlier remand, confirming the service tax...
![CESTAT Reduces Personal Penalty to ₹2 Lakhs Based on Voluntary Offer and Revised Duty Assessment [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Penalty-Revised-Duty-Assessment-Based-on-Voluntary-Offer-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT Reduces Personal Penalty to ₹2 Lakhs Based on Voluntary Offer and Revised Duty Assessment [Read Order]")
![CESTAT Declares Full CENVAT Credit Admissible on Flexographic Plates in Subsequent Financial Year [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/CESTAT-CESTAT-Mumbai-CENVAT-Credit-Flexographic-plates-CENVAT-credit-TAXSCAN.jpg "CESTAT Declares Full CENVAT Credit Admissible on Flexographic Plates in Subsequent Financial Year [Read Order]")
![Dispute Over Cenvat Credit Eligibility for Capital Goods Across Multiple Plants: CESTAT Allows Appeal Based on Single Registration [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/CESTAT-CESTAT-Ahmedabad-Cenvat-Credit-Cenvat-Credit-excess-TAXSCAN.jpg "Dispute Over Cenvat Credit Eligibility for Capital Goods Across Multiple Plants: CESTAT Allows Appeal Based on Single Registration [Read Order]")
![Taxability of Mobilization Advances: CESTAT Remands Matter to Commissioner for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Fresh-Adjudication.jpg "Taxability of Mobilization Advances: CESTAT Remands Matter to Commissioner for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]")
CESTAT Sets Aside Service Tax Demand on Dealer Incentives, Holds Payments Not Taxable as Business Auxiliary Service [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of Customs,Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) sets aside service tax demand on dealer incentives, holding payments not taxable as business auxiliary service. Jaika...
![CESTAT Sets Aside Service Tax Demand on Dealer Incentives, Holds Payments Not Taxable as Business Auxiliary Service [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/CESTAT-CESTAT-Mumbai-Service-Tax-Demand-on-Dealer-Incentives-TAXSCAN.jpg "CESTAT Sets Aside Service Tax Demand on Dealer Incentives, Holds Payments Not Taxable as Business Auxiliary Service [Read Order]")
![CENVAT Credit can be availed on Service Tax Paid over Advances received: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/service-tax.jpg "CENVAT Credit can be availed on Service Tax Paid over Advances received: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Commissioner Misdirected Findings in Export Services Dispute: CESTAT Remands Getz Pharma CENVAT Credit Refund Matter [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that the Commissioner (Appeals) misdirected the findings in the export services dispute involving Getz Pharma...
![Commissioner Misdirected Findings in Export Services Dispute: CESTAT Remands Getz Pharma CENVAT Credit Refund Matter [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/CESTAT-Over-Lack-of-Input-output-Nexus-CENVAT-Credit-taxscan.jpg "Commissioner Misdirected Findings in Export Services Dispute: CESTAT Remands Getz Pharma CENVAT Credit Refund Matter [Read Order]")
Relief to Glenmark Pharma: CESTAT Rules Crimp Pumps Fall Under Positive Displacement Pumps, Not Toilet Spray Parts [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that crimp pumps imported by Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. are classifiable under positive displacement...
![Relief to Glenmark Pharma: CESTAT Rules Crimp Pumps Fall Under Positive Displacement Pumps, Not Toilet Spray Parts [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Glenmark-Pharma-2.jpg "Relief to Glenmark Pharma: CESTAT Rules Crimp Pumps Fall Under Positive Displacement Pumps, Not Toilet Spray Parts [Read Order]")
Paying VAT on 80% and Service Tax on 20% of Works Contract Value Complies with Rule 2A: CESTAT in Otis Elevator Case [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) ruled that Otis Elevator Company (India) Ltd.'s methodology of paying VAT on 80% of the works contract value and...
![Paying VAT on 80% and Service Tax on 20% of Works Contract Value Complies with Rule 2A: CESTAT in Otis Elevator Case [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Otis-Elevator-Works-Contract-Value-CESTAT-in-Otis-Elevator-Case-taxscan.jpg "Paying VAT on 80% and Service Tax on 20% of Works Contract Value Complies with Rule 2A: CESTAT in Otis Elevator Case [Read Order]")
Win for Coca-Cola: CESTAT Rules ISD-Distributed CENVAT Credit Cannot Be Denied for Lack of Nexus with Manufacturing Activity [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that CENVAT credit distributed by an Input Service Distributor (ISD) cannot be denied to a manufacturing...
![Win for Coca-Cola: CESTAT Rules ISD-Distributed CENVAT Credit Cannot Be Denied for Lack of Nexus with Manufacturing Activity [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Win-for-Coca-Cola-CESTAT-ISD-Distributed-CENVAT-Credit-Lack-of-Nexus-Manufacturing-Activity-taxscan.jpg "Win for Coca-Cola: CESTAT Rules ISD-Distributed CENVAT Credit Cannot Be Denied for Lack of Nexus with Manufacturing Activity [Read Order]")
Rule 8 of Central Excise Valuation Rules Inapplicable Where there is No Sale or Captive Consumption: CESTAT in BSNL case [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that Rule 8 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000, is inapplicable in cases where there is neither a...
![Rule 8 of Central Excise Valuation Rules Inapplicable Where there is No Sale or Captive Consumption: CESTAT in BSNL case [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Relief-to-BSNL-BSNL-CESTAT-Quashes-Demand-of-Service-Tax-on-Telecom-Services-CESTAT-Demand-of-Service-Tax-Service-Tax-Telecom-Services-Service-Tax-Rules-TAxscan.jpg "Rule 8 of Central Excise Valuation Rules Inapplicable Where there is No Sale or Captive Consumption: CESTAT in BSNL case [Read Order]")