![Appeal against Demand under Central Excise (Valuation) Rules Rejected on limitation: CESTAT directs to provide Opportunity to overcome Impediment of Maintainability [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/CESTAT-CESTAT-Mumbai-Central-Excise-Rules-Impediment-of-Maintainability-Customs-and-excise-taxscan.jpg "Appeal against Demand under Central Excise (Valuation) Rules Rejected on limitation: CESTAT directs to provide Opportunity to overcome Impediment of Maintainability [Read Order]")
Appeal against Demand under Central Excise (Valuation) Rules Rejected on limitation: CESTAT directs to provide Opportunity to overcome Impediment of Maintainability [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of the Customs , Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) directed the department to provide one opportunity to overcome...
![Abatement Towards Sales Tax has to be allowed in terms of Sales Tax Liability at time of Clearance of Goods: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/CESTAT-CESTAT-Mumbai-Sales-Tax-Liability-Sales-Tax-Taxscan.jpg "Abatement Towards Sales Tax has to be allowed in terms of Sales Tax Liability at time of Clearance of Goods: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Trading was not an exempted service prior to 1-4-2011: CESTAT allows Pidilite Industries to retain Cenvat Credit [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/CESTAT-CESTAT-Mumbai-exempted-service-Cenvat-Credit-Customs-and-Excise-Trading-not-exempt-service-taxscan.jpg "Trading was not an exempted service prior to 1-4-2011: CESTAT allows Pidilite Industries to retain Cenvat Credit [Read Order]")
![Issue on Penalties u/s 11AC of Central Excise Act Fails to decide based on decision by Supreme Court on same issue: CESTAT directs Re adjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/CESTAT-CESTAT-Mumbai-Central-Excise-Act-Supreme-Court-Customs-and-Excise-section-11AC-of-Central-Excise-Act-taxscan.jpg "Issue on Penalties u/s 11AC of Central Excise Act Fails to decide based on decision by Supreme Court on same issue: CESTAT directs Re adjudication [Read Order]")
![Service Tax Appeal cannot be Dismissed for Non-Appearance at Hearing or unsigned Appeal Papers by Authorized Person: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/CESTAT-Mumbai-service-tax-case-Customs-appeal-TAXSCAN.jpeg "Service Tax Appeal cannot be Dismissed for Non-Appearance at Hearing or unsigned Appeal Papers by Authorized Person: CESTAT [Read Order]")
CESTAT allows Refund of Input Service Tax paid in Respect of Export of Cut and Polished Diamonds [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) found no merit in the Principal Additional Director General's order denying the refund of input service tax and...
![CESTAT allows Refund of Input Service Tax paid in Respect of Export of Cut and Polished Diamonds [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/CESTAT-CESTAT-Mumbai-Service-Tax-Export-of-Diamonds-Diamonds-Taxscan.jpg "CESTAT allows Refund of Input Service Tax paid in Respect of Export of Cut and Polished Diamonds [Read Order]")
CESTAT allows CENVAT Credit Claim Citing Authorization from Importer Despite Bill of Entry not in Taxpayer's Name [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) allowed the CENVAT credit claim despite the bill of entry not being in the appellant's name, citing that the...
![CESTAT allows CENVAT Credit Claim Citing Authorization from Importer Despite Bill of Entry not in Taxpayers Name [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/CESTAT-CESTAT-mumbai-Customs-Excise-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-CENVAT-Credit-CESTAT-Allows-CENVAT-Credit-Taxpayer-TAXSCAN.jpg "CESTAT allows CENVAT Credit Claim Citing Authorization from Importer Despite Bill of Entry not in Taxpayers Name [Read Order]")
Limitation Period for Refund Starts from Re-Assessment Date, not Bill of Entry Filing: CESTAT allows Refund u/s 27(1B) of Customs Act [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) allowed the refund claim, clarifying that under Section 27(1B) of the Customs Act, the limitation period for filing...
![Limitation Period for Refund Starts from Re-Assessment Date, not Bill of Entry Filing: CESTAT allows Refund u/s 27(1B) of Customs Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/CESTAT-Mumbai-Reassessment-notice-Reassessment-of-bills-of-entry-TAXSCAN.webp "Limitation Period for Refund Starts from Re-Assessment Date, not Bill of Entry Filing: CESTAT allows Refund u/s 27(1B) of Customs Act [Read Order]")
CENVAT Credit admissible on Central Excise Invoices pertaining to Copper Bars / Ingots: CESTAT [Read Order]
In a significant ruling, the Mumbai bench of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has ruled that Cenvat Credit Rs. 14, 67,774/- is admissible on Central Excise invoices...
![CENVAT Credit admissible on Central Excise Invoices pertaining to Copper Bars / Ingots: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/CESTAT-CESTAT-mumbai-CENVAT-Credit-Central-Excise-Central-Excise-Invoices-copper-bars-and-ingots-TAXSCAN.jpg "CENVAT Credit admissible on Central Excise Invoices pertaining to Copper Bars / Ingots: CESTAT [Read Order]")
CESTAT allows Partial Refund of ₹7.83 Lakh CENVAT Credit despite difference in Registered Address appearing in Invoices [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Mumbai bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) allowed a partial refund of Rs. 7.83 lakh CENVAT credit despite the difference in registered...
![CESTAT allows Partial Refund of ₹7.83 Lakh CENVAT Credit despite difference in Registered Address appearing in Invoices [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/CESTAT-CESTAT-Mumbai-CENVAT-CENVAT-Credit-Customs-Excise-and-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Taxscan.jpg "CESTAT allows Partial Refund of ₹7.83 Lakh CENVAT Credit despite difference in Registered Address appearing in Invoices [Read Order]")
![CESTAT dismisses Excise Appeal Citing no Discretion to Condone Delay beyond 30 Days [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/CESTAT-CESTAT-Mumbai-CESTAT-Dismisses-Excise-Appeal-Customs-Excise-and-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Condone-Delay-CESTAT-News-CESTAT-Updates-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT dismisses Excise Appeal Citing no Discretion to Condone Delay beyond 30 Days [Read Order]")
Investment of Surplus Cash in Mutual Funds not Considered Trading Activity, Exempted from Service Tax Demand: CESTAT [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Mumbai bench of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) ruled that the investment of surplus cash in mutual funds is not considered a trading activity...
![Investment of Surplus Cash in Mutual Funds not Considered Trading Activity, Exempted from Service Tax Demand: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/CESTAT-CESTAT-Mumbai-Mutual-Funds-Investment-of-Surplus-Cash-Trading-taxscan.jpg "Investment of Surplus Cash in Mutual Funds not Considered Trading Activity, Exempted from Service Tax Demand: CESTAT [Read Order]")