![Failure to File Claim during Insolvency Proceedings u/s 31 and 32A of IBC: Gujarat HC Abates Income Tax Appeals [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Insolvency-Proceedings-IBC-Gujarat-HC-Income-Tax-Appeals-taxscan.jpg "Failure to File Claim during Insolvency Proceedings u/s 31 and 32A of IBC: Gujarat HC Abates Income Tax Appeals [Read Order]")
Failure to File Claim during Insolvency Proceedings u/s 31 and 32A of IBC: Gujarat HC Abates Income Tax Appeals [Read Order]
The Gujarat High Court abated income tax appeals filed by the Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) due to the failure to file a claim during...
![GTA Services received in Place of Removal Falls under Definition of Input Service under Rule 2(1) of CCR: Himachal Pradesh HC sets aside CESTAT Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/GTA-GTA-Services-Cenvat-Credit-Rule-Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court-Cenvat-Credit-Rule-taxscan.jpg "GTA Services received in Place of Removal Falls under Definition of Input Service under Rule 2(1) of CCR: Himachal Pradesh HC sets aside CESTAT Order [Read Order]")
![Madras HC directs Fresh Appeal to CESTAT after Denial of Cross-Examination of Customs Auditors in Areca Nut Case [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Madras-high-court-CESTAT-Areca-Nut-Case-Cross-Examination-of-Customs-Auditors-taxscan.jpeg "Madras HC directs Fresh Appeal to CESTAT after Denial of Cross-Examination of Customs Auditors in Areca Nut Case [Read Order]")
![Insufficiency in Medical Evidence for Condonation of 2727-Day Delay in CESTAT Appeal: Madras HC dismisses Petition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Medical-Evidence-for-Condonation-delay-CESTAT-Madras-High-Court-writ-petition-taxscan.jpg "Insufficiency in Medical Evidence for Condonation of 2727-Day Delay in CESTAT Appeal: Madras HC dismisses Petition [Read Order]")
Customs Duty Element Less than Threshold Limit: Delhi HC dismisses Appeal for Low Tax Effect [Read Judgment]
The Delhi High Court has dismissed an appeal filed by the Principal Commissioner of Customs against an order by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ). The appeal was...
![Customs Duty Element Less than Threshold Limit: Delhi HC dismisses Appeal for Low Tax Effect [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Delhi-High-Court-Delhi-HC-Customs-duty-Delhi-HC-dismiss-appeals-TAXSCAN-1.jpg "Customs Duty Element Less than Threshold Limit: Delhi HC dismisses Appeal for Low Tax Effect [Read Judgment]")
Absence of Evidence of Taxpayer’s Authorisation as Customs Broker u/s 146 of Customs Act: CESTAT reduces Penalty to Rs. 25,000 /- [Read Order]
The Bangalore bench of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), in the absence of evidence of the taxpayer’s authorization as a customs broker under Section 146 of the Customs...
![Absence of Evidence of Taxpayer’s Authorisation as Customs Broker u/s 146 of Customs Act: CESTAT reduces Penalty to Rs. 25,000 /- [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Taxpayers-Authorisation-CESTAT-Customs-Act-Customs-Excise-and-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-penalty-taxscan.jpg "Absence of Evidence of Taxpayer’s Authorisation as Customs Broker u/s 146 of Customs Act: CESTAT reduces Penalty to Rs. 25,000 /- [Read Order]")
![CESTAT upholds Excise Duty Demand on Scraps, made within 5 years from Date of Knowledge [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/CESTAT-Excise-Duty-Excise-Duty-Demand-on-Scraps-Scraps-Customs-Excise-and-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Taxscan.jpg "CESTAT upholds Excise Duty Demand on Scraps, made within 5 years from Date of Knowledge [Read Order]")
CESTAT not Committed any Error in Law or Fact w.r.t. Demand of Differential Customs Duty: SC Dismisses Appeal [Read Judgement]
The Supreme Court dismissed the civil appeal filed by the customs department, affirming that the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) did not commit any error in law or fact...
![CESTAT not Committed any Error in Law or Fact w.r.t. Demand of Differential Customs Duty: SC Dismisses Appeal [Read Judgement]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/CESTAT-Supreme-Court-Customs-Duty-Customs-duty-demand-Tax-news-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT not Committed any Error in Law or Fact w.r.t. Demand of Differential Customs Duty: SC Dismisses Appeal [Read Judgement]")
Appeal against ₹2 Crore Excise Duty Demand: Meghalaya HC dismisses Appeal Directing to Approach Supreme Court u/s 35L of Central Excise Act [Read Order]
The Meghalaya High Court dismissed the department's appeal and held that the appeal relating to the value of service does not lie to the High Court under section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944....
Confiscation Fine under Excise Rules Reduces on Lack of Evidence on Excess SSI Exemption Limit: Supreme Court List Matter on Miscellaneous Day [Read Judgement]
In a recent case where the special leave petition ( SLP ) was filed against the Custom Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) order, the Supreme Court listed the matter on a miscellaneous...
![Confiscation Fine under Excise Rules Reduces on Lack of Evidence on Excess SSI Exemption Limit: Supreme Court List Matter on Miscellaneous Day [Read Judgement]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Supreme-Court-CESTAT-Confiscation-Fine-under-Excise-Rules-Excess-SSI-Exemption-Limit-Taxscan.jpg "Confiscation Fine under Excise Rules Reduces on Lack of Evidence on Excess SSI Exemption Limit: Supreme Court List Matter on Miscellaneous Day [Read Judgement]")