![No evidence as to what order was received by Reviewing Authority: CESTAT allows refund of CVD [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/No-evidence-order-Reviewing-Authority-CESTAT-refund-of-CVD-Taxscan.jpg "No evidence as to what order was received by Reviewing Authority: CESTAT allows refund of CVD [Read Order]")
No evidence as to what order was received by Reviewing Authority: CESTAT allows refund of CVD [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), allowed the refund of Countervailing Duty (CVD) as there was no...
![No Business Interest Found on Buyer and Seller to term ‘Sales to Related Person’: SC Set asides CESTAT [Read Judgement]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Business-Interest-Buyer-Seller-Sales-Supremecourt-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "No Business Interest Found on Buyer and Seller to term ‘Sales to Related Person’: SC Set asides CESTAT [Read Judgement]")
![Demand of Entire Delayed Payment in Cash Rule 8 (3A) of Central Excise Rule is not valid: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Demand-Payment-Delayed-Payment-Cash-Central-Excise-Rule-CESTAT-Customs-Excise-Service-Tax-Taxscan.jpg "Demand of Entire Delayed Payment in Cash Rule 8 (3A) of Central Excise Rule is not valid: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![No Documents to Show that Duty was Paid for Foreign Marked Gold: CESTAT Confirms Confiscation of Gold Bars and a Piece of Gold u/s 111(d) of Customs Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Documents-Duty-Foreign-Marked-Gold-CESTAT-Gold-Bars-Piece-of-Gold-Customs-Act-Taxscan.jpg "No Documents to Show that Duty was Paid for Foreign Marked Gold: CESTAT Confirms Confiscation of Gold Bars and a Piece of Gold u/s 111(d) of Customs Act [Read Order]")
![Main PCB, Lightning Protector, DC/AC Cables, Fuse Holders are neither Parts nor Accessories of IFWT, not eligible for Customs Duty Exemption: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/PCB-Lightning-Protector-Fuse-Holders-DC-Cables-AC-Cables-IFWT-Customs-Duty-Exemption-CESTAT-Customs-Excise-Service-Tax-Taxscan.jpg "Main PCB, Lightning Protector, DC/AC Cables, Fuse Holders are neither Parts nor Accessories of IFWT, not eligible for Customs Duty Exemption: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Commissioner(Appeal) cant go beyond the Scope SCN demanding Service Tax: CESTATÂ [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/CommissionerAppeal-Scope-SCN-Service-Tax-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg "Commissioner(Appeal) cant go beyond the Scope SCN demanding Service Tax: CESTATÂ [Read Order]")
Enhancement of Value of copper scrap on LME price is not valid in absence of acceptance by Assessee: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the enhancement of the value of copper scrap on LME price is not valid in absence of acceptance...
![Enhancement of Value of copper scrap on LME price is not valid in absence of acceptance by Assessee: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Enhancement-of-Value-of-copper-scrap-LME-price-not-valid-in-absence-of-acceptance-Assessee-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg "Enhancement of Value of copper scrap on LME price is not valid in absence of acceptance by Assessee: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Clubbing of both units based on ownership for SSI Exemption: CESTAT Approves Excise Duty against Himalaya Equipment
In a significant, the Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) approves excise duty against Himalaya Equipment since the clubbing of both units is based on...
Rejecting value at which Goods were Sold by Treating Assessee as Related Person u/s 4(4)(c) of Excise Act in absence of proper Test is Erroneous: SC [Read Order]
The Supreme Court (SC) has held that rejecting the value at which goods were sold by treating assessee as related person under section 4(4)(c) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 in absence of proper...
![Rejecting value at which Goods were Sold by Treating Assessee as Related Person u/s 4(4)(c) of Excise Act in absence of proper Test is Erroneous: SC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Goods-Sold-Assessee-Related-Person-Excise-Act-Test-is-Erroneous-SC-Supreme-Court-Taxscan.jpg "Rejecting value at which Goods were Sold by Treating Assessee as Related Person u/s 4(4)(c) of Excise Act in absence of proper Test is Erroneous: SC [Read Order]")
Valuation of Import Goods based on Value of Prime Material is not valid: CESTAT sets aside Computation based on LME Prices [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) has held that valuation of import goods based on the value of prime material is not valid in absence of cogent...
![Valuation of Import Goods based on Value of Prime Material is not valid: CESTAT sets aside Computation based on LME Prices [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Valuation-of-Import-Goods-Import-Goods-Import-Prime-Material-CESTAT-Computation-LME-Prices-Customs-Excise-Service-Tax-Taxscan.jpg "Valuation of Import Goods based on Value of Prime Material is not valid: CESTAT sets aside Computation based on LME Prices [Read Order]")
Excise Appeal filed beyond time limit prescribed under Section 85 (3) not maintainable: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) has held that the excise appeal filed beyond the time limit prescribed under Section 85 (3)of the Finance Act,...
![Excise Appeal filed beyond time limit prescribed under Section 85 (3) not maintainable: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Excise-Appeal-Excise-Appeal-CESTAT-Customs-taxscan.jpg "Excise Appeal filed beyond time limit prescribed under Section 85 (3) not maintainable: CESTAT [Read Order]")