![Rejection of Refund of amount paid through DEPB Scrip is not valid in Absence of Evidence: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Refund-DEPB-Scrip-Absence-of-Evidence-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Rejection of Refund of amount paid through DEPB Scrip is not valid in Absence of Evidence: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Rejection of Refund of amount paid through DEPB Scrip is not valid in Absence of Evidence: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the rejection of refund of the amount paid...
![CESTAT confirms Confiscation of Low Sulphur Waxy Residue being Hazardous Waste [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/CESTAT-confirms-Confiscation-of-Low-Sulphur-Waxy-Residue-being-Hazardous-Waste-TAXSCAN.jpg "CESTAT confirms Confiscation of Low Sulphur Waxy Residue being Hazardous Waste [Read Order]")
![Non-formation of GST Tribunal: Gujarat HC issues notice to Central Govt in Refund Claim Case [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Non-formation-of-GST-Tribunal-Gujarat-HC-issues-notice-to-Central-Govt-in-Refund-Claim-Case-TAXSCAN-1.jpg "Non-formation of GST Tribunal: Gujarat HC issues notice to Central Govt in Refund Claim Case [Read Order]")
![Remand for Review in Absence of Enabling Provision illegal: Orissa HC upholds Relief to Tata Iron & Steel [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Remand-for-Review-Orissa-High-Court-Tata-Iron-Steel-taxscan.jpg "Remand for Review in Absence of Enabling Provision illegal: Orissa HC upholds Relief to Tata Iron & Steel [Read Order]")
![Unauthorised Modification in Shipping Bill: CESTAT upholds Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Shipping-Bill-CESTAT-Penalty-CESTAT-upholds-Penalty-Modification-in-Shipping-Bill-taxscan.jpg "Unauthorised Modification in Shipping Bill: CESTAT upholds Penalty [Read Order]")
Placing Orders with Importers does not amount to Import: CESTAT quashes vague SCN and sets aside Penalty [Read Order]
The Principal Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT )has recently held that placing order with importers does not constitute import and quashed the Show Cause...
![Placing Orders with Importers does not amount to Import: CESTAT quashes vague SCN and sets aside Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Importers-CESTAT-SCN-Show-Cause-Notice-Penalty-taxscan.jpg "Placing Orders with Importers does not amount to Import: CESTAT quashes vague SCN and sets aside Penalty [Read Order]")
“Bagasse, Pressmud and boiler ash are not final goods” but merely a waste or by-product-CESTAT denies Credit [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai has denied credit upon bagasse, pressmud and boiler ash because which are not final goods but merely a waste or by-product ...
![“Bagasse, Pressmud and boiler ash are not final goods” but merely a waste or by-product-CESTAT denies Credit [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Bagasse-Pressmud-boiler-ash-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "“Bagasse, Pressmud and boiler ash are not final goods” but merely a waste or by-product-CESTAT denies Credit [Read Order]")
Penalty under Rule 26 Central Excise Rules cannot be imposed for issuance of bogus LR when period involved is prior to amendment: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Division Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ), ruled that penalty under Rule 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 cannot be imposed for issuance of bogus LR when...
![Penalty under Rule 26 Central Excise Rules cannot be imposed for issuance of bogus LR when period involved is prior to amendment: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Penalty-Central-Excise-Rules-Central-Excise-bogus-LR-amendment-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Penalty under Rule 26 Central Excise Rules cannot be imposed for issuance of bogus LR when period involved is prior to amendment: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Refund admissible on Trenching Pipeline installed partly in SEZ partly outside: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Refund-Refund-on-trenching-pipeline-trenching-pipeline-SEZ-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Refund admissible on Trenching Pipeline installed partly in SEZ partly outside: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Medicament Supplies to Government Hospitals and Institutional Buyers are to be valued u/s 4 of Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]
A Division Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Ahmedabad Bench held that Medicament Supplies to Government Hospitals and Institutional Buyers are to be valued...
![Medicament Supplies to Government Hospitals and Institutional Buyers are to be valued u/s 4 of Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Medicament-Supplies-Government-Hospitals-Institutional-Buyers-Central-Excise-Act-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Medicament Supplies to Government Hospitals and Institutional Buyers are to be valued u/s 4 of Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]")
CESTAT quashes Service Tax demand on consideration received by Developers from Co-development Agreement [Read Order]
A Division Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), quashed service tax demand on consideration received by developers from co-development agreement. The appellant...
![CESTAT quashes Service Tax demand on consideration received by Developers from Co-development Agreement [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/CESTAT-Service-Tax-demand-serviceTax-Developers-Co-development-Agreement-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT quashes Service Tax demand on consideration received by Developers from Co-development Agreement [Read Order]")