![Gauhati HC Quashes GST Demand due to Lack of Proper Show Cause Notice, u/s 73 of CGST Act [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/30/500x300_2057080-gst-demand-taxscan.webp "Gauhati HC Quashes GST Demand due to Lack of Proper Show Cause Notice, u/s 73 of CGST Act [Read Order]")
Gauhati HC Quashes GST Demand due to Lack of Proper Show Cause Notice, u/s 73 of CGST Act [Read Order]
PHANIDHAR BORSAIKIAIn a recent ruling passed on 24-6-25, the High Court of Chhattisgarh has quashed a GST demand against a petitioner after finding...
![GST Appeal Dismissed for One-Day Delay: Jharkhand HC rules Appeal filed within Condonable Period of 1 month, Sets aside Order [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/26/250x150_2054676-gst-appeal-gst-gst-appeal-dismissed-for-one-day-delay-one-day-delay-taxscan.webp "GST Appeal Dismissed for One-Day Delay: Jharkhand HC rules Appeal filed within Condonable Period of 1 month, Sets aside Order [Read Order]")
![No Participation in GST Adjudication: Madras HC Grants Final Opportunity to Assessee with Strict Recovery Warning [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/24/250x150_2053919-recovery-warning-hc-taxscan.webp "No Participation in GST Adjudication: Madras HC Grants Final Opportunity to Assessee with Strict Recovery Warning [Read Order]")
Common GST SCN for Multiple Years: Delhi HC directs to file Single Consolidated Appeal u/s 107 of CGST Act Against Common Order [Read Order]
The High Court of Delhi, directed the petitioner to file a single consolidated appeal under Section 107 of the Central Good and Service Tax ( CGST ) Act, 2017, against a common order arising from a...
![Common GST SCN for Multiple Years: Delhi HC directs to file Single Consolidated Appeal u/s 107 of CGST Act Against Common Order [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/23/500x300_2053270-common-gst-scn-for-multiple-years-gst-scn-delhi-hc-delhi-hc-directs-taxscan.webp "Common GST SCN for Multiple Years: Delhi HC directs to file Single Consolidated Appeal u/s 107 of CGST Act Against Common Order [Read Order]")
Appeal Challenging GST S. 62 Proceedings Rejected on Ground of Latches: Allahabad HC stays Coercive Action [Read Order]
The Allahabad High Court, in the matter of a challenging assessment under Section 62 of the Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) Act, stayed all coercive action until the next listing date. The...
![Appeal Challenging GST S. 62 Proceedings Rejected on Ground of Latches: Allahabad HC stays Coercive Action [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/23/500x300_2053296-appeal-challenging-gst-appeal-challenging-gst-proceedings-rejected-on-ground-of-laches-taxscan.webp "Appeal Challenging GST S. 62 Proceedings Rejected on Ground of Latches: Allahabad HC stays Coercive Action [Read Order]")
Maharashtra Electricity Transmission Co. Liable to Pay GST on Additional Deposit Received from End Users for Work Completion: AAR [Read Order]
The Maharashtra Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) recently held that Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Company Limited (MSETCL) is liable to pay Goods and Services Tax (GST) on additional...
![Maharashtra Electricity Transmission Co. Liable to Pay GST on Additional Deposit Received from End Users for Work Completion: AAR [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/23/500x300_2052979-maharashtra-electricity-transmission-aar-taxscan.webp "Maharashtra Electricity Transmission Co. Liable to Pay GST on Additional Deposit Received from End Users for Work Completion: AAR [Read Order]")
Calcutta HC Permits to File Connected Application Against SCN u/s 74 of CGST and Adjudication Order [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Calcutta High Court permitted the filing of a connected application against a show cause notice (SCN) under section 74 of the Central Goods and Service Tax (CGST) Act, 2017,...
![Calcutta HC Permits to File Connected Application Against SCN u/s 74 of CGST and Adjudication Order [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/18/500x300_2049775-cgst1.webp "Calcutta HC Permits to File Connected Application Against SCN u/s 74 of CGST and Adjudication Order [Read Order]")
Revocation of Provisional Attachment of Bank Account under s. 83 read with Rule 159(5) of the CGST Act/Rules, 2017 [Read Order]
Provisional attachment of a taxpayer’s bank account is the harshest interim measure available to the Goods and Services Tax (GST) administration. Section 83, as substituted with effect from 1...
![Revocation of Provisional Attachment of Bank Account under s. 83 read with Rule 159(5) of the CGST Act/Rules, 2017 [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/17/500x300_2049412-rules-2017-cgst-act-bank-account-taxscan.webp "Revocation of Provisional Attachment of Bank Account under s. 83 read with Rule 159(5) of the CGST Act/Rules, 2017 [Read Order]")
Merely Being a Subsidiary Does Not Qualify as 'Agent' under GST: Bombay HC Criticizes Dept for Relying on Unrelated Definitions [Read Order]
In a recent decision, the Bombay High Court ruled that a wholly owned Indian subsidiary providing services to its foreign parent company does not automatically become an “agent” under Section 2(5)...
![Merely Being a Subsidiary Does Not Qualify as Agent under GST: Bombay HC Criticizes Dept for Relying on Unrelated Definitions [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/17/500x300_2046245-gst-site-img.webp "Merely Being a Subsidiary Does Not Qualify as Agent under GST: Bombay HC Criticizes Dept for Relying on Unrelated Definitions [Read Order]")
AAR’s Classification of Inox Installation Plant as Immovable Property Lacks Reasoning: Madras HC Remands Matter [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court remanded a case back to the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (AAAR), Tamil Nadu, after finding that the authority had failed to provide sufficient...
![AAR’s Classification of Inox Installation Plant as Immovable Property Lacks Reasoning: Madras HC Remands Matter [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/14/500x300_2044355-inox-installation-plant-site-img.webp "AAR’s Classification of Inox Installation Plant as Immovable Property Lacks Reasoning: Madras HC Remands Matter [Read Order]")