CA signs Financial Statements not signed by Directors: Disciplinary Committee finds Guilty [Read Order]
The Chartered Accountant (CA) signed the financial statements which were not signed by the directors. The disciplinary committee of Institute of...
![Forgery nullifies everything: CESTAT confirms Suspension of CB Licence [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Forgery-CESTAT-Suspension-of-CB-Licence-TAXSCAN.jpg "Forgery nullifies everything: CESTAT confirms Suspension of CB Licence [Read Order]")
![Non-Response to Notice due to Negligence of Chartered Accountant/ Income Tax Practitioner: Madras HC directs Re-Adjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Non-Response-to-Notice-Negligence-of-Chartered-Accountant-Income-Tax-Practitioner-Madras-HC-Re-Adjudication-Taxscan.jpg "Non-Response to Notice due to Negligence of Chartered Accountant/ Income Tax Practitioner: Madras HC directs Re-Adjudication [Read Order]")
![Huge Delay of 1563 Days in filing of Appeal cannot be Attributed to Chartered Accountant: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Huge-Delay-filing-of-Appeal-Chartered-Accountant-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg "Huge Delay of 1563 Days in filing of Appeal cannot be Attributed to Chartered Accountant: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Payment of Monthly Retainership Fees to Chartered Accountant is Not “Capital” in Nature: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Payment-of-Monthly-Retainership-Fees-Retainership-Fees-Chartered-Accountant-Income-Tax-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Payment of Monthly Retainership Fees to Chartered Accountant is Not “Capital” in Nature: ITAT [Read Order]")
Bombay HC upholds Order Reprimanding Chartered Accountant for Misconduct of Soliciting Votes during ICAI Election [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court (HC) chaired by Justice Valmiki SA Menezes and Justice Dhiraj Singh Thakur upheld the order of reprimand serves as the end of justice and will be proportionate to the acts of...
![Bombay HC upholds Order Reprimanding Chartered Accountant for Misconduct of Soliciting Votes during ICAI Election [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Bombay-High-Court-Chartered-Accountant-Misconduct-Soliciting-Votes-ICAI-Election-ICAI-Election-CA-Taxscan.jpg "Bombay HC upholds Order Reprimanding Chartered Accountant for Misconduct of Soliciting Votes during ICAI Election [Read Order]")
Bombay HC refuses to grant Pre-Arrest Bail on an Offence under Maharashtra GST Act while considering Nature of Accusation [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court (HC) refused to grant pre-arrest bail on GST offences under Maharashtra GST Council while considering the nature of accusation. Bal Mukund Vaishnav, the applicant filed an...
![Bombay HC refuses to grant Pre-Arrest Bail on an Offence under Maharashtra GST Act while considering Nature of Accusation [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Bombay-High-Court-Pre-Arrest-Bail-Offence-Maharashtra-GST-Act-Nature-of-Accusation-Accusation-Taxscan.jpg "Bombay HC refuses to grant Pre-Arrest Bail on an Offence under Maharashtra GST Act while considering Nature of Accusation [Read Order]")
Failure to Audit Books of Account as per S. 44AB Not Bonafide Mistake when Assessee having Advice of Chartered Accountant : ITAT upholds Penalty [Read Order]
The Pune bench of Income Tax Appellate (ITAT) upheld the penalty imposed by the lower authorities under section 271B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The bench stated that the assessee has been...
![Failure to Audit Books of Account as per S. 44AB Not Bonafide Mistake when Assessee having Advice of Chartered Accountant : ITAT upholds Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Audit-Books-of-Account-Chartered-Accountant-ITAT-Income-tax-Penalty-Advice-of-Chartered-Accountant-taxscan.jpg "Failure to Audit Books of Account as per S. 44AB Not Bonafide Mistake when Assessee having Advice of Chartered Accountant : ITAT upholds Penalty [Read Order]")
Special Audit u/s 142(2A) of Income Tax Act 1961 can be conducted by Relying on Earlier Notice or A Fresh Notice: Supreme Court [Read Order]
The Division Bench of the Supreme Court comprising Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justice M.M.Sundresh has held that the special audit under Section 142(2A) of the Income Tax Act 1961 could be conducted...
![Special Audit u/s 142(2A) of Income Tax Act 1961 can be conducted by Relying on Earlier Notice or A Fresh Notice: Supreme Court [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Special-Audit-Income-Tax-Notice-Fresh-Notice-Supreme-Court-TAXSCAN.jpg "Special Audit u/s 142(2A) of Income Tax Act 1961 can be conducted by Relying on Earlier Notice or A Fresh Notice: Supreme Court [Read Order]")