![Show Cause Notices Issued after 3 years for Suo Motu Revision of Original Assessment Order(S) are Barred by Limitation: Chhattisgarh HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Show-Cause-Notices-Taxscan.jpg "Show Cause Notices Issued after 3 years for Suo Motu Revision of Original Assessment Order(S) are Barred by Limitation: Chhattisgarh HC [Read Judgment]")
Show Cause Notices Issued after 3 years for Suo Motu Revision of Original Assessment Order(S) are Barred by Limitation: Chhattisgarh HC [Read Judgment]
In Kishan Lal vs. Additional Commissioner of Commercial Tax, the Chhattisgarh High Court held that the show cause notices issued after the expiry of...
![Petitioner Entitled to C-Form under CST in respect of High Speed Diesel as Central Government didn’t notify it under CGST: Chhattisgarh HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Diesel-GST-Taxscan.jpg "Petitioner Entitled to C-Form under CST in respect of High Speed Diesel as Central Government didn’t notify it under CGST: Chhattisgarh HC [Read Order]")
![Service of Notice to Chartered Accountant of Assessee is not Service at all: Chhattisgarh HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Chartered-Accountant-Taxscan.jpg "Service of Notice to Chartered Accountant of Assessee is not Service at all: Chhattisgarh HC [Read Judgment]")
![Reassessment Proceeding must be initiated within the Time Limit prescribed under Section 149(1)(b): Chhattisgarh HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Reassessment-Chhattisgarh-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "Reassessment Proceeding must be initiated within the Time Limit prescribed under Section 149(1)(b): Chhattisgarh HC [Read Judgment]")
![Chhattisgarh Bar Council Eligible for IT Exemptions: Chhattisgarh HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Chhattisgarh-Bar-Council-Chhattisgarh-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "Chhattisgarh Bar Council Eligible for IT Exemptions: Chhattisgarh HC [Read Order]")
![Society consists of Urologist Doctors eligible for 12A Registration: Chhattisgarh HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Urologist-Doctors-Taxscan.jpg "Society consists of Urologist Doctors eligible for 12A Registration: Chhattisgarh HC [Read Judgment]")
![HC Quashes Re-Assessment since Conditions of s. 151(1) not fulfilled [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Assessment.jpg "HC Quashes Re-Assessment since Conditions of s. 151(1) not fulfilled [Read Judgment]")
Place of Removal is Delivery Point not the ‘Factory Gate’ of Assessee when Freight Charges paid by assessee is Integral Part of Price: Chhattisgarh HC [Read Order]
In Commissioner, CCEST, Bilaspur v. M/s Ultratech Cement Pvt Ltd, a division bench of the Chhattisgarh High Court held that the place of removal is delivery point and not the ‘factory gate’ of the...
Proceedings for Re-Assessment cannot be initiated on the basis of report of Assistant Valuation Officer: Chhattisgarh HC [Read Judgment]
Justice Sanjay K Agrawal of Chhattisgarh High Court held that, proceeding for reassessment under Section 147-148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 cannot be initiated on the basis of report of the Assistant...
![Proceedings for Re-Assessment cannot be initiated on the basis of report of Assistant Valuation Officer: Chhattisgarh HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Re-Assessment-Taxscan.jpg "Proceedings for Re-Assessment cannot be initiated on the basis of report of Assistant Valuation Officer: Chhattisgarh HC [Read Judgment]")
No Service Charges can be levied to the property held by the South Eastern Railway, says Chhattisgarh HC [Read Judgment]
The Chhattisgarh High Court said that, Property of South Eastern Railway is exempted from payment of Service Charges by virtue of provisions contained in Article 285(1) of the Constitution of India. ...
Presence of mens rea is Necessary Constituent for Imposing Penalty under Sec 78 of the Finance Act, 1994: Chhattisarh HC
In a recent ruling, the Chhattisgarh High Court held that, presence of mens rea is necessary constituent for imposing penalty under section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The petitioner M/s. Mahadev...