![Delay Beyond 30‑Day Limit Not Justified by Counsel’s Inaction: NCLT Dismisses Restoration Application [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/15/2119928-delay-beyond-30day-limit-not-justified-by-counsels-inaction-taxscan.webp "Delay Beyond 30‑Day Limit Not Justified by Counsel’s Inaction: NCLT Dismisses Restoration Application [Read Order]")
Delay Beyond 30‑Day Limit Not Justified by Counsel’s Inaction: NCLT Dismisses Restoration Application [Read Order]
The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Kolkata Bench, dismissed a restoration application filed by the applicant, holding that a delay beyond 30...
![CIRP not a Ground to seek Documents from CBI during Investigation: Delhi HC dismisses accused’s Plea u/s 91 CrPC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/17/2120205-cirp-ground-documents-from-cbi-during-investigation-delhi-hc-dismisses-plea-us-91-crp-taxscan.webp "CIRP not a Ground to seek Documents from CBI during Investigation: Delhi HC dismisses accused’s Plea u/s 91 CrPC [Read Order]")
![Workers Not Entitled to Wages for Period Not Worked During CIRP: NCLAT upholds Layoff Notice, Approved Resolution Plan Binding on All Stakeholders [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/07/2117525-nclat-resolution-plan-taxscan.jfif "Workers Not Entitled to Wages for Period Not Worked During CIRP: NCLAT upholds Layoff Notice, Approved Resolution Plan Binding on All Stakeholders [Read Order]")
![Pre-March 2020 Default Not Protected by S.10A Despite Contractual Cure Period: NCLAT upholds CIRP Admission [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/08/2117832-nclat-upholds-cirp-admission-taxscan.jfif "Pre-March 2020 Default Not Protected by S.10A Despite Contractual Cure Period: NCLAT upholds CIRP Admission [Read Order]")
![Unregistered ‘Agreement to Sell’ Does Not Bar Asset Transfer in CIRP: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/07/2117492-unregistered-agreement-sell-bar-asset-transfer-cirp-nclat-taxscan.webp "Unregistered ‘Agreement to Sell’ Does Not Bar Asset Transfer in CIRP: NCLAT [Read Order]")
![Corporate Law Case Digest: Key NCLT Rulings of 2025 [Part 2]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/09/2117990-nclt-case-digest-2025-part-2.webp "Corporate Law Case Digest: Key NCLT Rulings of 2025 [Part 2]")
NCLAT allows Correction Application, Orders Correction of Errors in Previous Order Pertaining to CIRP Status and Pending High Court Litigation [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Principal Bench at New Delhi, has allowed an application seeking correction of inadvertent errors in an earlier order passed in an insolvency ...
![NCLAT allows Correction Application, Orders Correction of Errors in Previous Order Pertaining to CIRP Status and Pending High Court Litigation [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/01/2116477-nclat-allows-correction-application-orders-correction-errors-previous-order-pertaining-cirp-status-pending-high-court-litigation-taxscan.webp "NCLAT allows Correction Application, Orders Correction of Errors in Previous Order Pertaining to CIRP Status and Pending High Court Litigation [Read Order]")
IBBI Imposes ₹2 Lakh Penalty on Insolvency Professional for Non-Cooperation in Investigation, Flags Serious Irregularities in CIRP [Read Order]
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) has imposed a monetary penalty on insolvency professional after finding that he failed to cooperate with an investigation initiated in connection...
![IBBI Imposes ₹2 Lakh Penalty on Insolvency Professional for Non-Cooperation in Investigation, Flags Serious Irregularities in CIRP [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/01/2116476-ibbi-imposes-penalty-insolvency-professional-non-cooperation-investigation-flags-serious-irregularities-cirp-taxscan.webp "IBBI Imposes ₹2 Lakh Penalty on Insolvency Professional for Non-Cooperation in Investigation, Flags Serious Irregularities in CIRP [Read Order]")
Date of Default Not Mandatory in Invoice-Based Demand Notice: NCLAT Sets Aside Section 9 Rejection [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) clarified that a specific date of default was not mandatory in Form-4 invoice-based demand notices under Section 9 of the IBC,...
![Date of Default Not Mandatory in Invoice-Based Demand Notice: NCLAT Sets Aside Section 9 Rejection [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/15/2112278-date-default-not-mandatory-invoice-based-demand-notice-nclat-sets-aside-section-9-rejection-taxscan.webp "Date of Default Not Mandatory in Invoice-Based Demand Notice: NCLAT Sets Aside Section 9 Rejection [Read Order]")
No CIRP for COVID-Period Default: NCLAT Affirms NCLT Order Rejecting Application u/s 10A [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) Principal Bench at New Delhi has upheld the dismissal of a Section 7 application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, holding that no ...
![No CIRP for COVID-Period Default: NCLAT Affirms NCLT Order Rejecting Application u/s 10A [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/10/2111279-nclat-affirms-nclt-order-rejecting-application-taxscan.jfif "No CIRP for COVID-Period Default: NCLAT Affirms NCLT Order Rejecting Application u/s 10A [Read Order]")