![Relief to Technova Imaging Systems: Bombay HC Allows Depreciation Claim Without Section 72A Approval [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Technova-Imaging-Systems-bombay-high-court-taxscan.jpg "Relief to Technova Imaging Systems: Bombay HC Allows Depreciation Claim Without Section 72A Approval [Read Order]")
Relief to Technova Imaging Systems: Bombay HC Allows Depreciation Claim Without Section 72A Approval [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court granted relief to Technova Imaging Systems and allowed the depreciation claim without the approval under Section 72A of the...
![ITAT Remands Case for Fresh Hearing Despite Assessee Fails to Respond to Notices Four Times, w/o any Reasons [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ITAT-fresh-hearing.webp "ITAT Remands Case for Fresh Hearing Despite Assessee Fails to Respond to Notices Four Times, w/o any Reasons [Read Order]")
![Trust Charging Fees Alone Does Not Attract Proviso to S. 2(15): ITAT Remands S. 11 Exemption Denial Matter for Fresh Consideration [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Exemption-Income-Tax-Return-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg.webp "Trust Charging Fees Alone Does Not Attract Proviso to S. 2(15): ITAT Remands S. 11 Exemption Denial Matter for Fresh Consideration [Read Order]")
![Cause of Delay should be Considered rather than Length of Delay for Condonation: ITAT Remands 44AB Penalty Issue for Reconsideration [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Condones-Delay-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Cause of Delay should be Considered rather than Length of Delay for Condonation: ITAT Remands 44AB Penalty Issue for Reconsideration [Read Order]")
![Relief to Airtel, Charges Paid for Bandwidth to Overseas Telecom Operators Do Not Amount to Royalty under Income Tax Act: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/airtel-delhi-high-court-taxscan.jpg "Relief to Airtel, Charges Paid for Bandwidth to Overseas Telecom Operators Do Not Amount to Royalty under Income Tax Act: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
Interest Income Earned During Plant Setup Treated as Capital: ITAT Upholds CIT(A)'s Decision to Delete Addition [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal(ITAT)upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appelas)[CIT(A)]'s decision to delete an addition made by the Assessing Officer(AO), who had treated...
![Interest Income Earned During Plant Setup Treated as Capital: ITAT Upholds CIT(A)s Decision to Delete Addition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/power-plant.jpg "Interest Income Earned During Plant Setup Treated as Capital: ITAT Upholds CIT(A)s Decision to Delete Addition [Read Order]")
ITAT Restores Cash Deposit Addition to AO for Fresh Examination after Assessee clarifies Bank Account Ownership [Read Order]
The Delhi bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) restores the cash deposit addition to the assessing officer (AO) for fresh examination after the assessee clarifies bank account ownership....
![ITAT Restores Cash Deposit Addition to AO for Fresh Examination after Assessee clarifies Bank Account Ownership [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/cash-deposit-itat-taxscan.jpg "ITAT Restores Cash Deposit Addition to AO for Fresh Examination after Assessee clarifies Bank Account Ownership [Read Order]")
Major Relief to DLF as ITAT upholds Deletion of ₹6000+ Crore Addition, Dismisses Revenue’s Appeal [Read Order]
The Delhi bench of Income tax appellate tribunal ( ITAT ) has upheld the deletion of additions of Rs. 6000+ crores on DLF Ltd accepting the revenue recognition as per Percentage of Completion Method...
![Major Relief to DLF as ITAT upholds Deletion of ₹6000+ Crore Addition, Dismisses Revenue’s Appeal [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/dlf.jpg "Major Relief to DLF as ITAT upholds Deletion of ₹6000+ Crore Addition, Dismisses Revenue’s Appeal [Read Order]")
ITAT Restores Co-op Society’s Appeal, Orders Fresh Hearing on Rs.1.1 Cr 80P Deduction Denial [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Panaji Bench has set aside an ex parte order against The Mercantile Co-op Credit Society Ltd., directing the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] to...
![ITAT Restores Co-op Society’s Appeal, Orders Fresh Hearing on Rs.1.1 Cr 80P Deduction Denial [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/ITAT-Restores-Co-op-Societys-Appeal-Orders-Fresh-Hearing-80P-Deduction-Denial-taxscan.jpg "ITAT Restores Co-op Society’s Appeal, Orders Fresh Hearing on Rs.1.1 Cr 80P Deduction Denial [Read Order]")
![Failure to Adjudicate AO’s Jurisdictional Grounds: ITAT Remands Matter to CIT(A) [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/ITAT-Adjudication.jpg "Failure to Adjudicate AO’s Jurisdictional Grounds: ITAT Remands Matter to CIT(A) [Read Order]")
Arvindo Trust Scam Fallout: ITAT Dismisses Appeal Against Disallowance of Bogus Research Donation [Read order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Ahmedabad Bench “SMC” has dismissed the appeal filed against the disallowance of a deduction claimed on a donation made to the Arvindo Institute of Applied...
![Arvindo Trust Scam Fallout: ITAT Dismisses Appeal Against Disallowance of Bogus Research Donation [Read order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Bogus-donation.jpg "Arvindo Trust Scam Fallout: ITAT Dismisses Appeal Against Disallowance of Bogus Research Donation [Read order]")
AO Adds Rs. 5.38 Lakh as Unexplained Cash Deposit: ITAT Confirms Rs. 48,000 Addition as Taxpayer Fails to Prove Source [Read Order]
The Hyderabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) confirmed Rs. 48,000 as assessee failed to prove source of deposits in the case where the Assessing Officer (AO) had made an addition...
![AO Adds Rs. 5.38 Lakh as Unexplained Cash Deposit: ITAT Confirms Rs. 48,000 Addition as Taxpayer Fails to Prove Source [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Unexplained-Cash-Deposits.jpg "AO Adds Rs. 5.38 Lakh as Unexplained Cash Deposit: ITAT Confirms Rs. 48,000 Addition as Taxpayer Fails to Prove Source [Read Order]")