![Delay in filing appeal before Lower Authorities due to Mistake of Counsel: ITAT directs Readjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/ITAT-ITAT-Bangalore-Income-Tax-Readjudication-TAXSCAN.jpg "Delay in filing appeal before Lower Authorities due to Mistake of Counsel: ITAT directs Readjudication [Read Order]")
Delay in filing appeal before Lower Authorities due to Mistake of Counsel: ITAT directs Readjudication [Read Order]
Bangalore bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ), observed that the delay in filing appeal before the lower authorities happened due to...
![Exemption u/s11(1) of Income Tax Act Not available for expense incurred for giving Mementos to Presidents and Secretaries of Milk Producers Association: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/ITAT-ITAT-Bangalore-Income-Tax-Exemption-TAXSCAN.jpg "Exemption u/s11(1) of Income Tax Act Not available for expense incurred for giving Mementos to Presidents and Secretaries of Milk Producers Association: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Failure to Comply CIT(A)s Intimations despite Adequate Opportunity being Given: ITAT dismisses Ex-Parte Order Grounds [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Failure-to-Comply-CITA-Intimations-despite-Adequate-Opportunity-ITAT-dismisses-Ex-Parte-Order-Grounds-TAXSCAN.jpg "Failure to Comply CIT(A)s Intimations despite Adequate Opportunity being Given: ITAT dismisses Ex-Parte Order Grounds [Read Order]")
![Voluntary Disallowance of Expense u/s 40 (a) (ia) not a base to treat Taxpayer as Assessee in Default: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/ITAT-ITAT-Delhi-Disallowance-of-Expense-Voluntary-Disallowance-of-Expense-TAXSCAN.jpg "Voluntary Disallowance of Expense u/s 40 (a) (ia) not a base to treat Taxpayer as Assessee in Default: ITAT [Read Order]")
![No invocation of Section 201(1)/201(1A) of Income Tax Act as assessee cannot be termed “assessee in default” for non-deduction of TDS: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/ITAT-ITAT-Rajkot-Income-Tax-TDS-ITAT-ruling-on-TDS-deduction-TAXSCAN.jpg "No invocation of Section 201(1)/201(1A) of Income Tax Act as assessee cannot be termed “assessee in default” for non-deduction of TDS: ITAT [Read Order]")
![“Live Rights” not “Copyright”, any Payment made not Taxable as Royalty: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/ITAT-ITAT-Delhi-Live-Rights-Copyright-Royalty-fee-Royalty-tax-Tax-news-Royalty-TAXSCAN.jpg "“Live Rights” not “Copyright”, any Payment made not Taxable as Royalty: ITAT [Read Order]")
Failure to file Form no. 10CCB along with Return of Income: ITAT upholds disallowance of deduction u/s 80IC [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ), Chennai while upheld the disallowance of deduction claimed under Section 80IC of the Income Tax Act, 1961 held that the assessee failed to file Form...
![Failure to file Form no. 10CCB along with Return of Income: ITAT upholds disallowance of deduction u/s 80IC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/ITAT-ITAT-Chennai-ITAT-upholds-disallowance-of-Deduction-Income-tax-Return-of-income-Failure-to-file-Form-Disallowance-of-Deduction-TAXSCAN.jpeg "Failure to file Form no. 10CCB along with Return of Income: ITAT upholds disallowance of deduction u/s 80IC [Read Order]")
No addition based on outcome of Confirmatory Letters when assessee proved genuineness of business transactions: ITAT [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ), Chennai bench held that no addition should be made on the basis of outcome of confirmatory letters when assessee proved genuineness of business...
![No addition based on outcome of Confirmatory Letters when assessee proved genuineness of business transactions: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/No-addition-addition-Confirmatory-Letters-addition-based-on-outcome-of-Confirmatory-Letters-when-assessee-Business-Transactions-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "No addition based on outcome of Confirmatory Letters when assessee proved genuineness of business transactions: ITAT [Read Order]")
No addition shall be made u/s 68 of Income tax act on basis of statement of third party with respect to Sale of Shares carried through proper Banking Channel: ITAT [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ), Mumbai bench ruled that no addition should be made under Section 68 of the income Tax Act , 1961 on the basis of statement of third party with...
![No addition shall be made u/s 68 of Income tax act on basis of statement of third party with respect to Sale of Shares carried through proper Banking Channel: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/ITAT-ITAT-Mumbai-Income-tax-Shares-Banking-channels-Sale-of-shares-TAXSCAN.jpg "No addition shall be made u/s 68 of Income tax act on basis of statement of third party with respect to Sale of Shares carried through proper Banking Channel: ITAT [Read Order]")
ITAT directs Re-adjudication with respect to contracts and bills of Client Code Modification carried out by Brokers and Assessee [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai bench directed readjudication with respect to contracts and bills of client code modification (CCM)carried out by brokers and assessee. The...
![ITAT directs Re-adjudication with respect to contracts and bills of Client Code Modification carried out by Brokers and Assessee [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/ITAT-Readjudication-contracts-Client-Code-Modification-Brokers-and-Assessee-taxscan.jpg "ITAT directs Re-adjudication with respect to contracts and bills of Client Code Modification carried out by Brokers and Assessee [Read Order]")
Rejecting TP Analysis without Giving any Specific Reason is invalid, CIT(A) validates TP Report: ITAT upholds Order of CIT(A) [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) upheld the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) which validated the Transfer Pricing ( TP ) report by holding that...
![Rejecting TP Analysis without Giving any Specific Reason is invalid, CIT(A) validates TP Report: ITAT upholds Order of CIT(A) [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/T-P-Analysis-CITA-TP-Report-ITAT-ITAT-Upholds-Order-of-CITA-Rejecting-T-P-Analysis-without-Giving-any-Specific-Reason-taxscan.jpg "Rejecting TP Analysis without Giving any Specific Reason is invalid, CIT(A) validates TP Report: ITAT upholds Order of CIT(A) [Read Order]")
![ITAT Annual Digest [Part 54]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/ITAT-ANNUAL-DIGEST-PART-54-ITAT-ITAT-ANNUAL-DIGEST-taxscan.jpg "ITAT Annual Digest [Part 54]")