![No Condition of Re-export when Goods are Allowed to be Redeemed on Payment of Appropriate Fine: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/No-Condition-of-Re-export-when-Goods-are-Allowed-to-be-Redeemed-Re-export-Goods-Redeemed-Payment-of-Appropriate-Fine-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg "No Condition of Re-export when Goods are Allowed to be Redeemed on Payment of Appropriate Fine: CESTAT [Read Order]")
No Condition of Re-export when Goods are Allowed to be Redeemed on Payment of Appropriate Fine: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Bangalore Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), ruled that no condition of re-export to be imposed when the...
![Amount Deposited without Authority of law Cannot be Considered as Service Tax, Refund Allowable: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Amount-Deposited-without-Authority-of-law-Cannot-be-Considered-as-Service-Tax-Amount-Deposited-Authority-of-law-Service-Tax-Refund-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg "Amount Deposited without Authority of law Cannot be Considered as Service Tax, Refund Allowable: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Claim of Cenvat Credit cannot be rejected without considering Evidence: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Claim-of-Cenvat-Credit-cannot-rejected-without-considering-Evidence-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Claim of Cenvat Credit cannot be rejected without considering Evidence: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![No Bar of Unjust Enrichment Applicable When Payment made by Appellant: CESTAT allows Refund of Service Tax [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/No-Bar-of-Unjust-Enrichment-Applicable-When-Payment-made-by-Appellant-CESTAT-allows-Refund-of-Service-Tax-TAXSCAN.jpg "No Bar of Unjust Enrichment Applicable When Payment made by Appellant: CESTAT allows Refund of Service Tax [Read Order]")
Non-compliance of Section 35-F CETA on Pre-Deposit to Maintain Statutory Appeal: Allahabad HC Directs to Pre-Deposit Amount [Read Order]
The Allahabad High Court directed to pre-deposit amount on non-compliance of Section 35-F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (CETA) on pre-deposit to maintain statutory appeal. The appeal has been...
Processing of Beach Sand Minerals results to form Processed Ilmenite, Attracts 5% FOB value: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that processing of beach sand minerals results to form processed ilmenite and it attracts 5% on...
![Processing of Beach Sand Minerals results to form Processed Ilmenite, Attracts 5% FOB value: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Processing-of-Beach-Sand-Minerals-results-to-form-Processed-Ilmenite-Attracts-FOB-value-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Processing of Beach Sand Minerals results to form Processed Ilmenite, Attracts 5% FOB value: CESTAT [Read Order]")
No records to prove availment of Cenvat Credit while Rejecting Service Tax Refund Claim: CESTAT directs Re-Adjudication [Read Order]
The Bangalore Bench of Central Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has set aside the service tax refund claim order and directed the adjudicating authority to re-adjudicate the case...
![No records to prove availment of Cenvat Credit while Rejecting Service Tax Refund Claim: CESTAT directs Re-Adjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/No-records-to-prove-Availment-of-Cenvat-Credit-Service-Tax-Refund-Service-Tax-Refund-Claim-Refund-Claim-CESTAT-Re-adjudication-Taxscan.jpg "No records to prove availment of Cenvat Credit while Rejecting Service Tax Refund Claim: CESTAT directs Re-Adjudication [Read Order]")
Emails of Supplier not an Authentic Evidence to Prove the Contention of Wrong Supply by Importer: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Chennai bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the emails of the supplier not authentic evidence to prove the contention of wrong supply by the...
![Emails of Supplier not an Authentic Evidence to Prove the Contention of Wrong Supply by Importer: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Emails-of-Supplier-not-an-Authentic-Evidence-to-Prove-the-Contention-of-Wrong-Supply-by-Importer-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Emails of Supplier not an Authentic Evidence to Prove the Contention of Wrong Supply by Importer: CESTAT [Read Order]")
No evidence proves Unjust enrichment, Refund of Excess Paid Duty must be Credit to Consumer Welfare Fund: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Hyderabad bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)has held that refund of excess paid duty must be credited to the consumer welfare fund in the absence of...
![No evidence proves Unjust enrichment, Refund of Excess Paid Duty must be Credit to Consumer Welfare Fund: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/No-evidence-proves-Unjust-enrichment-Refund-of-Excess-Paid-Duty-must-be-Credit-to-Consumer-Welfare-Fund-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "No evidence proves Unjust enrichment, Refund of Excess Paid Duty must be Credit to Consumer Welfare Fund: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![CBDT notifies Income Tax Sixth Amendment Rules 2023 [Read Notification]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/CBDT-notifies-Income-Tax-Sixth-Amendment-Rules-2023-TAXSCAN.jpg "CBDT notifies Income Tax Sixth Amendment Rules 2023 [Read Notification]")
No Exact Date of Receipt of Original Orders in Review Orders: CESTAT dismisses Appeal on being Barred by Limitation [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), dismissed an appeal on being barred by limitation as no exact date of receipt of the original orders was noted in...
![No Exact Date of Receipt of Original Orders in Review Orders: CESTAT dismisses Appeal on being Barred by Limitation [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/receipt.jpg "No Exact Date of Receipt of Original Orders in Review Orders: CESTAT dismisses Appeal on being Barred by Limitation [Read Order]")