![Limitation Period for Filing Appeal under Service Tax Counts From Actual Date of Service, Not Dispatch Date: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Limitation-Period-Filing-Appeal-taxscan.jpg "Limitation Period for Filing Appeal under Service Tax Counts From Actual Date of Service, Not Dispatch Date: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Limitation Period for Filing Appeal under Service Tax Counts From Actual Date of Service, Not Dispatch Date: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Allahabad Bench of Customs,Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) holds that the limitation period for filing an appeal under...
![CESTAT Upholds Rejection of Refund Claim as Time-Barred, Dismisses Appeal Citing Binding Limitation Under S.102 [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/refund-claim-Taxscan.jpg "CESTAT Upholds Rejection of Refund Claim as Time-Barred, Dismisses Appeal Citing Binding Limitation Under S.102 [Read Order]")
![Madhya Pradesh HC Rejects Petitions Challenging Suspension of Private Warehouse Licenses on Availability of Remedy under Customs Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/private-ware-house-Taxscan.jpg "Madhya Pradesh HC Rejects Petitions Challenging Suspension of Private Warehouse Licenses on Availability of Remedy under Customs Act [Read Order]")
![Mere Postal Dispatch Without Proof of Delivery Does Not Satisfy Service Requirements u/s 37C(1) of Central Excise: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/dispach-site-img.jpg "Mere Postal Dispatch Without Proof of Delivery Does Not Satisfy Service Requirements u/s 37C(1) of Central Excise: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![CESTAT finds Impugned Order Cryptic in Nature: Remands Matter for Denovo Adjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Denovo-Adjudication-cestat-delhi-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT finds Impugned Order Cryptic in Nature: Remands Matter for Denovo Adjudication [Read Order]")
CESTAT Sets Aside Penalty on Freight Forwarder as it Finds No Evidence of Intended Export [Read Order]
The Delhi bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) in New Delhi has set aside a penalty of Rs. 5 lakhs imposed on the assessee, Saurav Chopra, a freight forwarder,...
![CESTAT Sets Aside Penalty on Freight Forwarder as it Finds No Evidence of Intended Export [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/no-evidence.jpg "CESTAT Sets Aside Penalty on Freight Forwarder as it Finds No Evidence of Intended Export [Read Order]")
Freight and Insurance Included in Assessable Value for FOR Destination Sales: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that in cases of FOR (Free on Road) destination sales, the cost of freight and insurance must be included...
![Freight and Insurance Included in Assessable Value for FOR Destination Sales: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Freight-Insurance-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Freight and Insurance Included in Assessable Value for FOR Destination Sales: CESTAT [Read Order]")
University Entitled to SSI Exemption on Renting of Immovable Services when Aggregate Income is Below ₹10 Lakh: CESTAT [Read Order]
In a recent decision on the tax exemption entitlements of educational institutions, the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) of New Delhi bench held that the university is...
![University Entitled to SSI Exemption on Renting of Immovable Services when Aggregate Income is Below ₹10 Lakh: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/SSI-Exemption-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "University Entitled to SSI Exemption on Renting of Immovable Services when Aggregate Income is Below ₹10 Lakh: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Relief for Godrej and Boyce: CESTAT Rules Mere Non-Submission of Re-Warehousing Certificates Not Sufficient to Sustain Duty Demand [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that mere non-submission of re-warehousing certificates cannot be the sole basis for confirming central...
![Relief for Godrej and Boyce: CESTAT Rules Mere Non-Submission of Re-Warehousing Certificates Not Sufficient to Sustain Duty Demand [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Godrej-and-Boyce-site-img-Recovered.jpg "Relief for Godrej and Boyce: CESTAT Rules Mere Non-Submission of Re-Warehousing Certificates Not Sufficient to Sustain Duty Demand [Read Order]")
Trademark Ownership Must Be Verified via Registrar, Not Unreliable Websites: CESTAT Confirms Exemption Eligibility for Small Service Provider [Read Order]
The Principal Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) at New Delhi held that trademark ownership must be verified through official registration records maintained by...
![Trademark Ownership Must Be Verified via Registrar, Not Unreliable Websites: CESTAT Confirms Exemption Eligibility for Small Service Provider [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/trademark-site-img.jpg "Trademark Ownership Must Be Verified via Registrar, Not Unreliable Websites: CESTAT Confirms Exemption Eligibility for Small Service Provider [Read Order]")
CESTAT allows Refund of Unutilized CENVAT Credit on Education Cess, Citing Transitional Provisions of CGST Act [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of Customs,Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal(CESTAT) allowed a refund of ₹25,52,385 to the assessee, ruling that unutilized CENVAT credit on Education Cess and Secondary...
![CESTAT allows Refund of Unutilized CENVAT Credit on Education Cess, Citing Transitional Provisions of CGST Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/education-site-img.jpg "CESTAT allows Refund of Unutilized CENVAT Credit on Education Cess, Citing Transitional Provisions of CGST Act [Read Order]")
Setback for J.K. Cements: CESTAT Denies Interest on Cenvat Refund, Sanctioned Within Three Months [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of Customs,Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal(CESTAT)Â ruled against J.K. Cements' claim for interest on a Cenvat refund, stating that since the refund was processed within...
![Setback for J.K. Cements: CESTAT Denies Interest on Cenvat Refund, Sanctioned Within Three Months [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/J.K.-Cements-site-img.jpg "Setback for J.K. Cements: CESTAT Denies Interest on Cenvat Refund, Sanctioned Within Three Months [Read Order]")