![Royalty for Exclusive 99-Year Trademark Use Qualifies as Deemed Sale, Not Taxable as Service: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/09/500x300_2041814-deemed-sale-cestat-taxscan.webp "Royalty for Exclusive 99-Year Trademark Use Qualifies as Deemed Sale, Not Taxable as Service: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Royalty for Exclusive 99-Year Trademark Use Qualifies as Deemed Sale, Not Taxable as Service: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that royalty received for the exclusive use of trademarks...
![Service Tax on Transit Insurance Unsustainable When Already Included in Excise Duty: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/09/250x150_2041763-service-tax-transit-insurance-cestat-delhi-taxscan.webp "Service Tax on Transit Insurance Unsustainable When Already Included in Excise Duty: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Remuneration Paid to Whole-Time Directors Not Taxable under RCM: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/04/250x150_2041231-rcm.webp "Remuneration Paid to Whole-Time Directors Not Taxable under RCM: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Redemption Fine Not Justified on Re-Exported Goods Due to Suppliers Mistake: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Re-Exported-Goods-1.jpg "Redemption Fine Not Justified on Re-Exported Goods Due to Suppliers Mistake: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Amendment of Bill of Entry to Claim CVD Exemption After Five Years Not Allowed Without Reassessment: CESTAT Sets Aside Appellate Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Amendment-Bill-Entry-Claim-CVD-Exemption-Reassessment-CESTAT-Appellate-Order-Taxscan.jpg "Amendment of Bill of Entry to Claim CVD Exemption After Five Years Not Allowed Without Reassessment: CESTAT Sets Aside Appellate Order [Read Order]")
![Confirmation of Service Tax Higher than Proposed Demand in SCN is Not Valid: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Service-Tax-SCN-TAXSCAN.jpg "Confirmation of Service Tax Higher than Proposed Demand in SCN is Not Valid: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Limitation Period for Filing Appeal under Service Tax Counts From Actual Date of Service, Not Dispatch Date: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Allahabad Bench of Customs,Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) holds that the limitation period for filing an appeal under service tax counts from the actual date of service of...
![Limitation Period for Filing Appeal under Service Tax Counts From Actual Date of Service, Not Dispatch Date: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Limitation-Period-Filing-Appeal-taxscan.jpg "Limitation Period for Filing Appeal under Service Tax Counts From Actual Date of Service, Not Dispatch Date: CESTAT [Read Order]")
CESTAT Upholds Rejection of Refund Claim as Time-Barred, Dismisses Appeal Citing Binding Limitation Under S.102 [Read Order]
The Delhi bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has upheld the rejection of a refund claim filed by the assessee, ruling that the application was time-barred...
![CESTAT Upholds Rejection of Refund Claim as Time-Barred, Dismisses Appeal Citing Binding Limitation Under S.102 [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/refund-claim-Taxscan.jpg "CESTAT Upholds Rejection of Refund Claim as Time-Barred, Dismisses Appeal Citing Binding Limitation Under S.102 [Read Order]")
Madhya Pradesh HC Rejects Petitions Challenging Suspension of Private Warehouse Licenses on Availability of Remedy under Customs Act [Read Order]
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has refused to accept writ petitions contesting the denial of private warehouse license applications on availability of remedy under the Customs Act, 1962. Justices...
![Madhya Pradesh HC Rejects Petitions Challenging Suspension of Private Warehouse Licenses on Availability of Remedy under Customs Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/private-ware-house-Taxscan.jpg "Madhya Pradesh HC Rejects Petitions Challenging Suspension of Private Warehouse Licenses on Availability of Remedy under Customs Act [Read Order]")
Mere Postal Dispatch Without Proof of Delivery Does Not Satisfy Service Requirements u/s 37C(1) of Central Excise: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Allahabad Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that mere postal dispatch of an order without proof of delivery does not satisfy the service requirements...
![Mere Postal Dispatch Without Proof of Delivery Does Not Satisfy Service Requirements u/s 37C(1) of Central Excise: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/dispach-site-img.jpg "Mere Postal Dispatch Without Proof of Delivery Does Not Satisfy Service Requirements u/s 37C(1) of Central Excise: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![CESTAT finds Impugned Order Cryptic in Nature: Remands Matter for Denovo Adjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Denovo-Adjudication-cestat-delhi-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT finds Impugned Order Cryptic in Nature: Remands Matter for Denovo Adjudication [Read Order]")
CESTAT Sets Aside Penalty on Freight Forwarder as it Finds No Evidence of Intended Export [Read Order]
The Delhi bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) in New Delhi has set aside a penalty of Rs. 5 lakhs imposed on the assessee, Saurav Chopra, a freight forwarder,...
![CESTAT Sets Aside Penalty on Freight Forwarder as it Finds No Evidence of Intended Export [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/no-evidence.jpg "CESTAT Sets Aside Penalty on Freight Forwarder as it Finds No Evidence of Intended Export [Read Order]")