![5 Hearings Missed including one During Covid Period: ITAT Grants Another Chance, Restores Matter to CIT(A) [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Personal-Hearing-mandatory-Rectification-Application-decision-filer-Adversely-Madras-HC-taxscan.jpg "5 Hearings Missed including one During Covid Period: ITAT Grants Another Chance, Restores Matter to CIT(A) [Read Order]")
5 Hearings Missed including one During Covid Period: ITAT Grants Another Chance, Restores Matter to CIT(A) [Read Order]
The Pune Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) granted relief to assessee who missed 5 hearings including one scheduled during covid...
![Levy of Late Fee u/s 234E for TDS Returns Filed Prior to June 2015 Unjustified: ITAT Rules Amendment is Prospective [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/TDS-Returns-TDS-Returns-Filed-TDS-Returns-Filed-Prior-taxscan.jpg "Levy of Late Fee u/s 234E for TDS Returns Filed Prior to June 2015 Unjustified: ITAT Rules Amendment is Prospective [Read Order]")
![Mere Non-Compliance of Summons u/s 131 Not Ground for Addition u/s 68 When Evidences Furnished before AO: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Incriminating-Material-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Mere Non-Compliance of Summons u/s 131 Not Ground for Addition u/s 68 When Evidences Furnished before AO: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Delayed Credit of ESI/EPF Amounts: ITAT deletes Penalty on Assessee for Technical Glitches [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/EPF-.jpg "Delayed Credit of ESI/EPF Amounts: ITAT deletes Penalty on Assessee for Technical Glitches [Read Order]")
![Loans and Interest Payment Accepted in Past Years Cannot Be Disputed Without Fresh Grounds: ITAT Deletes Additions [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/loans-and-interest-payment.jpg "Loans and Interest Payment Accepted in Past Years Cannot Be Disputed Without Fresh Grounds: ITAT Deletes Additions [Read Order]")
ITAT dismisses Revenue's Appeal as Assessee Settles Dispute under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dismissed an appeal filed by the Revenue against the assessee, Vipulbhai Labhubhai Patel, for the Assessment Year 2016-17 after the...
![ITAT dismisses Revenues Appeal as Assessee Settles Dispute under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Vivad-Se-Vishwas-Scheme-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "ITAT dismisses Revenues Appeal as Assessee Settles Dispute under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 [Read Order]")
Income Tax Authorities Failed to Determine Whether Taxed Amount is Lottery Win or Corporate Gift: ITAT Sends Matter Back to AO for Fresh Consideration [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ), Ranchi Bench, has set aside an income tax demand after finding that the income tax authorities failed to clearly determine whether the taxed amount was...
![Income Tax Authorities Failed to Determine Whether Taxed Amount is Lottery Win or Corporate Gift: ITAT Sends Matter Back to AO for Fresh Consideration [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/corporate-gift-site-img.jpg "Income Tax Authorities Failed to Determine Whether Taxed Amount is Lottery Win or Corporate Gift: ITAT Sends Matter Back to AO for Fresh Consideration [Read Order]")
Loans from Subsidiary to Holding Company not Deemed Dividend u/s 2(22)(e) When Transactions are Part of Consistent Business Practice: ITAT [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) Kolkata Bench has held that loans received by a holding company from its subsidiary cannot be taxed as deemed dividend under Section...
![Loans from Subsidiary to Holding Company not Deemed Dividend u/s 2(22)(e) When Transactions are Part of Consistent Business Practice: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Loans-Subsidiary-Holding-Company-taxscan.jpg "Loans from Subsidiary to Holding Company not Deemed Dividend u/s 2(22)(e) When Transactions are Part of Consistent Business Practice: ITAT [Read Order]")
Bombay HC Rules Basis for Infrastructure Fee Deduction Must Be Actual Receipts, Not Gross Advertising Bills [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Bombay High Court ruled that infrastructure fee deductions under the Income Tax Act must be calculated based on actual advertising receipts and not on gross advertising bills....
![Bombay HC Rules Basis for Infrastructure Fee Deduction Must Be Actual Receipts, Not Gross Advertising Bills [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Infrastructure-Fee-Deduction-high-court-taxscan.jpg "Bombay HC Rules Basis for Infrastructure Fee Deduction Must Be Actual Receipts, Not Gross Advertising Bills [Read Order]")
Sikkimese Identity Alone Not Sufficient for S.10(26AAA) Exemption, All Conditions Must Be Verified: ITAT [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) has set aside an order that granted exemption under Section 10(26AAA) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and ruled that all statutory...
![Sikkimese Identity Alone Not Sufficient for S.10(26AAA) Exemption, All Conditions Must Be Verified: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Undue-Benefit-Tax-Payer-Tax-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg.webp "Sikkimese Identity Alone Not Sufficient for S.10(26AAA) Exemption, All Conditions Must Be Verified: ITAT [Read Order]")
Grounds Not Arising from Subject Matter of CIT(A)'s Order Not Maintainable: ITAT dismisses Appeal [Read Order]
The Cochin Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dismissed the appeal holding that grounds of appeal not arising from subject matter of order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)...
![Grounds Not Arising from Subject Matter of CIT(A)s Order Not Maintainable: ITAT dismisses Appeal [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/appeal-CITA-taxscan.jpg "Grounds Not Arising from Subject Matter of CIT(A)s Order Not Maintainable: ITAT dismisses Appeal [Read Order]")
Excess Expenditure Does Not Bar 15% Accumulation Claim u/s 11(1)(a): ITAT Relieves Rajasthan Cricket Association [Read Order]
In a recent decision made by the Jaipur bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ), it was held that the 15% accumulation claim under Section 11(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 can be...
![Excess Expenditure Does Not Bar 15% Accumulation Claim u/s 11(1)(a): ITAT Relieves Rajasthan Cricket Association [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/rajasthan-cricket-site-img.jpg "Excess Expenditure Does Not Bar 15% Accumulation Claim u/s 11(1)(a): ITAT Relieves Rajasthan Cricket Association [Read Order]")