![Hearing Notices Sent by CIT(A) via Email against Assessees Request in Form 35: ITAT remits Matter to CIT(A) [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Income-Tax-ITAT-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-ITAT-News-TAXSCAN.jpeg "Hearing Notices Sent by CIT(A) via Email against Assessees Request in Form 35: ITAT remits Matter to CIT(A) [Read Order]")
Hearing Notices Sent by CIT(A) via Email against Assessee's Request in Form 35: ITAT remits Matter to CIT(A) [Read Order]
The Bangalore Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) has remitted the matter to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)[CIT(A)] after...
![Software Project Abandoned with No Enduring Benefit, Expenses treated as Revenue in Nature: ITAT Deletes Addition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Service-Tax-Leviable-Services-Nature-Software-Development-CESTAT-taxscan.jpeg "Software Project Abandoned with No Enduring Benefit, Expenses treated as Revenue in Nature: ITAT Deletes Addition [Read Order]")
![Failure to Disclose Loan, Repayment or Interest Paid to Creditor: ITAT upholds Addition of Rs. 1.30 crores [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Income-Tax-ITAT-ITAT-Ahmedabad-ITAT-loan-repayment-case-TAXSCAN.jpg "Failure to Disclose Loan, Repayment or Interest Paid to Creditor: ITAT upholds Addition of Rs. 1.30 crores [Read Order]")
![Additional interest u/s 244A(1A) of Income Tax Act Applies for delayed Refunds: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ITAT-ITAT-Ahmedabad-interest-Additional-interest-Section-244A1A-Section-244A1A-of-the-Income-Tax-Act-Delayed-Refund-Income-Tax-Act-TAXSCAN.jpg "Additional interest u/s 244A(1A) of Income Tax Act Applies for delayed Refunds: ITAT [Read Order]")
![ITAT deletes Disallowance of Rs.26.25 Lakh u/s 36(1)(iii) based on Records of Sufficient Interest-Free Funds and Commercial Expediency [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Income-Tax-ITAT-ITAT-judgment-on-commercial-expediency-Tax-disallowance-under-Section-36-TAXSCAN.webp "ITAT deletes Disallowance of Rs.26.25 Lakh u/s 36(1)(iii) based on Records of Sufficient Interest-Free Funds and Commercial Expediency [Read Order]")
AO passes Ex Parte Assessment Order without considering ITR Filed in response to S. 148: ITAT directs to pass Order afresh [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) found that the Assessing Officer ( AO ) had passed an ex parte assessment order without considering the return filed by the assessee in...
![AO passes Ex Parte Assessment Order without considering ITR Filed in response to S. 148: ITAT directs to pass Order afresh [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ITAT-ITAT-Ahmedabad-Ex-Parte-Assessment-Order-ITR-Filed-Section-148-Income-Tax-Act-taxscan.jpg "AO passes Ex Parte Assessment Order without considering ITR Filed in response to S. 148: ITAT directs to pass Order afresh [Read Order]")
80C Deduction cannot be denied Solely due to Incorrect Filing of ITR-5 Instead of ITR-2: ITAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) has ruled that the deduction under Section 80C of Income Tax Act, 1961 cannot be denied solely due to incorrect filing in ITR Form-5...
![80C Deduction cannot be denied Solely due to Incorrect Filing of ITR-5 Instead of ITR-2: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ITAT-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Filing-of-ITR-ITR-Income-Tax-Return-Section-80C-Section-80C-Income-Tax-Act-TAXSCAN.jpg "80C Deduction cannot be denied Solely due to Incorrect Filing of ITR-5 Instead of ITR-2: ITAT [Read Order]")
Cash Seized from Partner’s Premises Cannot Be Adjusted Against Partnership Firm’s Tax Liability: ITAT [Read Order]
The Bangalore Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) ruled that cash seized from a partner's premises cannot be automatically deemed adjustable against the partnership firm's tax liability. ...
![Cash Seized from Partner’s Premises Cannot Be Adjusted Against Partnership Firm’s Tax Liability: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Income-Tax-ITAT-ITAT-Bangalore-ITAT-Updates-Partnership-Firm-Tax-TAXSCAN.jpg "Cash Seized from Partner’s Premises Cannot Be Adjusted Against Partnership Firm’s Tax Liability: ITAT [Read Order]")
S.68 of Income Tax Act not Attracted on Violation of RBI Notifications if Nature of Cash Deposit Adequately Explained: ITAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad “A” bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) in a recent case held that additions under section 68 of the Income Tax Act 1961 ( ITA ) are not to be attracted upon violation...
![S.68 of Income Tax Act not Attracted on Violation of RBI Notifications if Nature of Cash Deposit Adequately Explained: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Income-Tax-Income-Tax-Act-ITAT-RBI-Notifications-RBI-cash-deposit-case-TAXSCAN.jpeg "S.68 of Income Tax Act not Attracted on Violation of RBI Notifications if Nature of Cash Deposit Adequately Explained: ITAT [Read Order]")
TP Adjustment cannot be at ‘NIL’ as determined by the TPO: ITAT directs TPO to consider ALP afresh [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) ruled that the Transfer Pricing Officer ( TPO ) erred in setting the Arm’s Length Price ( ALP ) for Intra Group Services at NIL for the...
![TP Adjustment cannot be at ‘NIL’ as determined by the TPO: ITAT directs TPO to consider ALP afresh [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Income-Tax-ITAT-TP-Adjustment-by-TPO-Intra-Group-Services-TAXSCAN.jpg "TP Adjustment cannot be at ‘NIL’ as determined by the TPO: ITAT directs TPO to consider ALP afresh [Read Order]")
AO made Addition u/s 68 due to Mismatch in Loan Creditor's Voter ID and Bank Statement Photo: ITAT remands to Produce Evidence [Read Order]
The New Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) remanded the Assessing Officer's ( AO ) addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 matter, which was based on a mismatched...
![AO made Addition u/s 68 due to Mismatch in Loan Creditors Voter ID and Bank Statement Photo: ITAT remands to Produce Evidence [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Income-Tax-ITAT-ITAT-Delhi-Bank-loan-Statement-TAXSCAN.jpg "AO made Addition u/s 68 due to Mismatch in Loan Creditors Voter ID and Bank Statement Photo: ITAT remands to Produce Evidence [Read Order]")
Relief to Microsoft and Others as Delhi HC quashes Income Tax Assessment Order issued w/o Draft Order [Read Order]
In this case, one of the writ petitioners, Microsoft India, had filed its Income Tax Returns ( ITR ) on 30, 2008, for the Assessment Year 2008-2009. The returns filed were selected for scrutiny, and...
![Relief to Microsoft and Others as Delhi HC quashes Income Tax Assessment Order issued w/o Draft Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Income-Tax-Income-Tax-Returns-ITR-Microsoft-income-tax-case-India-TAXSCAN.jpg "Relief to Microsoft and Others as Delhi HC quashes Income Tax Assessment Order issued w/o Draft Order [Read Order]")