![Addition of Rs. 6.75 Lakh Gifts from Sister and Father-in-Law by AO: ITAT Deletes Addition, Accepts Proof of Receipt [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/26/500x300_2080811-gifts-father-in-law-itat-proof-of-receipt-gifts-from-sister-and-father-in-law-taxscan.webp "Addition of Rs. 6.75 Lakh Gifts from Sister and Father-in-Law by AO: ITAT Deletes Addition, Accepts Proof of Receipt [Read Order]")
Addition of Rs. 6.75 Lakh Gifts from Sister and Father-in-Law by AO: ITAT Deletes Addition, Accepts Proof of Receipt [Read Order]
The Chandigarh Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) deleted the addition of Rs. 6.75 lakh gifts from the sister and father-in-law made by...
![Charitable Institution Free to use Accumulated Income up to 5 years without Prior Exhaustion of Current Year’s Income: ITAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/25/250x150_2080317-charitable-institution-accumulated-income-itat-taxscan.webp "Charitable Institution Free to use Accumulated Income up to 5 years without Prior Exhaustion of Current Year’s Income: ITAT [Read Order]")
![ITAT Reduces Disallowance of Foreign Travel Expenses to 25% Due to Partial Documentation [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/20/250x150_2078599-foreign-travel-expense-taxscan.webp "ITAT Reduces Disallowance of Foreign Travel Expenses to 25% Due to Partial Documentation [Read Order]")
![AO Cannot Go Beyond Net Profit in P&L Except as Permitted under Explanation to Section 115J: Bombay HC in Mahindra Case [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/18/250x150_2078071-ao-beyond-net-profit-pl-except-explanation-section-115j-bombay-hc-mahindra-case-taxscan.webp "AO Cannot Go Beyond Net Profit in P&L Except as Permitted under Explanation to Section 115J: Bombay HC in Mahindra Case [Read Order]")
Bonafide Error in Claiming 15% Depreciation Instead of 7.5%: ITAT finds Assessee Eligible for Additional Depreciation u/s 32(1)(iia) [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) held that a bonafide error in claiming 15% depreciation instead of the eligible 7.5% on plant and machinery used for less than 180 days ...
![Bonafide Error in Claiming 15% Depreciation Instead of 7.5%: ITAT finds Assessee Eligible for Additional Depreciation u/s 32(1)(iia) [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/10/500x300_2075264-bonafide-error-bonafide-error-in-claiming-15-depreciation-taxscan.webp "Bonafide Error in Claiming 15% Depreciation Instead of 7.5%: ITAT finds Assessee Eligible for Additional Depreciation u/s 32(1)(iia) [Read Order]")
Cash Deposits Treated as Unexplained u/s 69A: ITAT Restores Matter to AO Noting Failure to Examine Debit Entries and Additional Evidence [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) restored the matter to the Assessing Officer (AO) after noting that cash deposits of ₹18.32 lakh were treated as unexplained under ...
![Cash Deposits Treated as Unexplained u/s 69A: ITAT Restores Matter to AO Noting Failure to Examine Debit Entries and Additional Evidence [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/31/500x300_2071595-cash-deposits-cash-deposits-treated-cash-deposits-treated-as-unexplained-taxsacn.webp "Cash Deposits Treated as Unexplained u/s 69A: ITAT Restores Matter to AO Noting Failure to Examine Debit Entries and Additional Evidence [Read Order]")
Reassessment Invalid Due to Lack of New Tangible Material and Credible Information: ITAT Quashes ₹33.81 Lakh Addition [Read Order]
The Surat Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled that the reassessment under Section 147 of the Income TaxAct, 1961, was invalid due to the lack of new tangible material and credible...
![Reassessment Invalid Due to Lack of New Tangible Material and Credible Information: ITAT Quashes ₹33.81 Lakh Addition [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/31/500x300_2071541-reassessment-itat-taxscan.webp "Reassessment Invalid Due to Lack of New Tangible Material and Credible Information: ITAT Quashes ₹33.81 Lakh Addition [Read Order]")
![Penalty Matter Remanded: ITAT Directs AO to Give Effect to Quantum Appeal Before Deciding [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/30/500x300_2070678-penalty-taxpayer-itat-confirms-penalty-taxscan-2.webp "Penalty Matter Remanded: ITAT Directs AO to Give Effect to Quantum Appeal Before Deciding [Read Order]")
Disallowance of ₹58.83 Lakh u/s 57 Deduction for Lack of Evidence: ITAT Remands Matter to AO [Read Order]
The Patna Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer (AO )after examining the disallowance of a ₹58.83 lakh deduction claimed under Section 57 of...
![Disallowance of ₹58.83 Lakh u/s 57 Deduction for Lack of Evidence: ITAT Remands Matter to AO [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/28/500x300_2070060-disallowance-itat-taxscan.webp "Disallowance of ₹58.83 Lakh u/s 57 Deduction for Lack of Evidence: ITAT Remands Matter to AO [Read Order]")
ITAT rules in Favor of Jaggery Trader, holds No 40(a)(ia) Disallowance Where Tax already Paid on Interest Income [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Pune bench, has ruled in favor of a jaggery products trader, holding that no disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, can be made...
![ITAT rules in Favor of Jaggery Trader, holds No 40(a)(ia) Disallowance Where Tax already Paid on Interest Income [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/26/500x300_2069427-itat-rules-favor-jaggery-trader-40aia-disallowance-tax-interest-income-taxscan.webp "ITAT rules in Favor of Jaggery Trader, holds No 40(a)(ia) Disallowance Where Tax already Paid on Interest Income [Read Order]")