![Allowance of Set off of Earlier Years Excess Application from Subsequent Year Surplus Income u/s 11 of Income Tax Act to Charitable Trust : ITAT Condones Delay of 264 Days [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Allowance-of-Set-off-of-Earlier-Years-Excess-Application-from-Subsequent-Year-Surplus-Income-Income-Tax-Act-to-Charitable-Trust-ITAT-Condones-Delay-TAXSCAN.jpg "Allowance of Set off of Earlier Years Excess Application from Subsequent Year Surplus Income u/s 11 of Income Tax Act to Charitable Trust : ITAT Condones Delay of 264 Days [Read Order]")
Allowance of Set off of Earlier Years Excess Application from Subsequent Year Surplus Income u/s 11 of Income Tax Act to Charitable Trust : ITAT Condones Delay of 264 Days [Read Order]
The Bangalore Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) condoned a delay of 264 days in filing appeal and held that the assessee is eligible...
![Consultants failure to comply with Notice of CIT-Exemptions wont result in Non-registration of Trust u/s 12A of Income Tax Act: ITAT Condones delay of 671 days [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Notice-of-CIT-Exemptions-Notice-CIT-Exemptions-CIT-Non-registration-of-Trust-Non-registration-Trust-Income-Tax-Act-Income-Tax-ITAT-Condones-delay-Taxscan.jpg "Consultants failure to comply with Notice of CIT-Exemptions wont result in Non-registration of Trust u/s 12A of Income Tax Act: ITAT Condones delay of 671 days [Read Order]")
![Income Tax Payable Fully Adjusted Against Refund for Subsequent AY: ITAT Condones Delay of 85 Days [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Re-calculation-of-Refund-Receivable-to-Claim-Interest-on-Refunds-ITAT-Condones-Delay-TAXSCAN.jpg "Income Tax Payable Fully Adjusted Against Refund for Subsequent AY: ITAT Condones Delay of 85 Days [Read Order]")
No Fresh Assessment can be Directed by CIT if AO Choose not to Make Any Addition on Income Tax: ITAT Condones Delay of 319 Days [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), condoned delay of 319days in filing the appeal and held that when once Assessing Officer (AO) took one of the possible views and chose not...
![No Fresh Assessment can be Directed by CIT if AO Choose not to Make Any Addition on Income Tax: ITAT Condones Delay of 319 Days [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Fresh-Assessment-Directed-CIT-AO-Addition-Income-Tax-ITAT-Condones-Delay-TAXSCAN.jpg "No Fresh Assessment can be Directed by CIT if AO Choose not to Make Any Addition on Income Tax: ITAT Condones Delay of 319 Days [Read Order]")
Mandatory 10% Pre-deposit for Filing GST Appeal is not Possible if Bank Account is Freezed: AP HC Condones Delay of 25 days [Read Order]
- “The right of appeal which is created under statute is a substantive right of the party that cannot be denied by taking pedantic view” In a major decision the Andhra Pradesh High Court condoned...
![Mandatory 10% Pre-deposit for Filing GST Appeal is not Possible if Bank Account is Freezed: AP HC Condones Delay of 25 days [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Mandatory-Pre-deposit-Filing-GST-Appeal-Bank-Account-Freezed-AP-HC-Condones-Delay-TAXSCAN.jpg "Mandatory 10% Pre-deposit for Filing GST Appeal is not Possible if Bank Account is Freezed: AP HC Condones Delay of 25 days [Read Order]")
SC Condones Delay of 707 Days in Income Tax Refiling, Directs Delhi HC to Consider Appeal on Merits [Read Order]
The Supreme Court (SC) of India condoned a delay of 707 days in income tax refiling and directed the Delhi High Court (HC) to consider appeal on merits. The appellant/Revenue is aggrieved by the...
![SC Condones Delay of 707 Days in Income Tax Refiling, Directs Delhi HC to Consider Appeal on Merits [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/SC-Condones-Delay-SC-Condones-Delay-Condones-Delay-of-707-Days-in-Income-Tax-Refiling-Delhi-HC-Delhi-High-Court-taxscan.jpg "SC Condones Delay of 707 Days in Income Tax Refiling, Directs Delhi HC to Consider Appeal on Merits [Read Order]")
Re-calculation of Refund Receivable to Claim Interest on Refunds: ITAT Condones Delay of 98 Days [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) restored the matter to the file of the Assessing Officer (AO) for proper verification and calculation of refund receivables to grant...
![Re-calculation of Refund Receivable to Claim Interest on Refunds: ITAT Condones Delay of 98 Days [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Re-calculation-of-Refund-Receivable-to-Claim-Interest-on-Refunds-ITAT-Condones-Delay-TAXSCAN.jpg "Re-calculation of Refund Receivable to Claim Interest on Refunds: ITAT Condones Delay of 98 Days [Read Order]")
Plea for Deduction of Professional and Salary Expenses u/s 201 of Income Tax Act: ITAT Condones Delay of 85 Days [Read Order]
The Surat Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in the absence of deliberate or intentional or gross negligence and hence condoned the delay of 85 days and allowed the plea for deduction of...
![Plea for Deduction of Professional and Salary Expenses u/s 201 of Income Tax Act: ITAT Condones Delay of 85 Days [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Plea-for-Deduction-of-Professional-and-Salary-Expenses-Income-Tax-Act-ITAT-Condones-Delay-TAXSCAN.jpg "Plea for Deduction of Professional and Salary Expenses u/s 201 of Income Tax Act: ITAT Condones Delay of 85 Days [Read Order]")
![Delay for Claim under CIRP without any Valid Ground: NCLAT refuse to Condones Delay [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Delay-Claim-under-CIRP-NCLAT-Condones-Delay-Delay-for-Claim-under-CIRP-NCLAT-refuse-to-Condones-Delay-taxscan.jpg "Delay for Claim under CIRP without any Valid Ground: NCLAT refuse to Condones Delay [Read Order]")
![ITAT Condones Delay Caused by Negligence of Tax Practitioner in Service of Notice [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/ITAT-Condones-Delay-Caused-by-Negligence-of-Tax-Practitioner-in-Service-of-Notice-TAXSCAN-.jpg "ITAT Condones Delay Caused by Negligence of Tax Practitioner in Service of Notice [Read Order]")