![Clerical Error in filling Bill of Entry does not attract Penalty and Confiscation under Customs Act: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Clerical-Error-Bill-of-Entry-Penalty-Customs-Act-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpeg "Clerical Error in filling Bill of Entry does not attract Penalty and Confiscation under Customs Act: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Clerical Error in filling Bill of Entry does not attract Penalty and Confiscation under Customs Act: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ), New Delhi has held that Clerical error in filling the Bill of Entry does not...
![Goods are liable for Confiscation U/Ss 111 and 112 of Customs Act when ‘Improperly Imported’: CESTAT quashes Penalty against CHA [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Goods-liable-Confiscation-Customs-Act-Improperly-Imported-CESTAT-Penalty-CHA-Taxscan.jpeg "Goods are liable for Confiscation U/Ss 111 and 112 of Customs Act when ‘Improperly Imported’: CESTAT quashes Penalty against CHA [Read Order]")
![Gold Bar with Foreign Marking liable for Absolute Confiscation If Source not Explained: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Gold-Bar-Foreign-Marking-liable-Confiscation-CESTAT-taxscan.jpeg "Gold Bar with Foreign Marking liable for Absolute Confiscation If Source not Explained: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Voluntarily Acceptance and Willingness to Pay the Duty at the Enhanced rate Exempt from Liability of Confiscation and Redemption Fine: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Voluntarily-Pay-the-Duty-Confiscation-Redemption-CESTAT-taxscan.jpeg "Voluntarily Acceptance and Willingness to Pay the Duty at the Enhanced rate Exempt from Liability of Confiscation and Redemption Fine: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Disputes concerning Exemption Claim and Rate of Duty are Different: Supreme Court upholds Jurisdiction of HC in entertaining Appeal against CESTAT Order [Read Order]
The Supreme Court has held that disputes concerning exemption claim and rate of duty are different and upholds the Jurisdiction of the High Court in entertaining an appeal against CESTAT Order. ...
![Disputes concerning Exemption Claim and Rate of Duty are Different: Supreme Court upholds Jurisdiction of HC in entertaining Appeal against CESTAT Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Exemption-Claim-Rate-of-Duty-Supreme-Court-Jurisdiction-CESTAT-taxscan.jpeg "Disputes concerning Exemption Claim and Rate of Duty are Different: Supreme Court upholds Jurisdiction of HC in entertaining Appeal against CESTAT Order [Read Order]")
![Rules for Confiscation does not attract If Export is not Prohibited: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Confiscation-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpeg "Rules for Confiscation does not attract If Export is not Prohibited: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Different Branded, Unbranded Shoes alleged to be violative of IPR infringement to be absolutely confiscated as being Prohibited Goods under Customs Act: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that different branded, unbranded shoes alleged to be violative of IPR infringement to be ...
![Different Branded, Unbranded Shoes alleged to be violative of IPR infringement to be absolutely confiscated as being Prohibited Goods under Customs Act: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/IPR-Infringement-Confiscated-Customs-Act-CESTAT-Shoes-Taxscan.jpg "Different Branded, Unbranded Shoes alleged to be violative of IPR infringement to be absolutely confiscated as being Prohibited Goods under Customs Act: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Proposal for Confiscation, Penalty cannot be segregated from Customs duty demand: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax (CESTAT) ruled that Proposal for confiscation, the penalty cannot be segregated from Customs duty demand. The appellant, Dhiren Enterprise has...
![Proposal for Confiscation, Penalty cannot be segregated from Customs duty demand: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/confiscation-penalty-Customs-duty-demand-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg "Proposal for Confiscation, Penalty cannot be segregated from Customs duty demand: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Order of Confiscation with option for Redemption Fine and Penalty for not having IEC number is Invalid: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the order of confiscation with an option for redemption fine and penalty for importer not having IEC...
![Order of Confiscation with option for Redemption Fine and Penalty for not having IEC number is Invalid: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Order-of-Confiscation-fine-penalty-IEC-number-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpeg "Order of Confiscation with option for Redemption Fine and Penalty for not having IEC number is Invalid: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Non-Offering of Option to pay Fine in lie of Confiscation to the Person in Possession of Gold is Arbitrary: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Bangalore bench of the Customs and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), while quashing an order of the customs authorities, held that the order of confiscation without offering an option to...
![Non-Offering of Option to pay Fine in lie of Confiscation to the Person in Possession of Gold is Arbitrary: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Confiscation-Possession-of-Gold-is-Arbitrary-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg "Non-Offering of Option to pay Fine in lie of Confiscation to the Person in Possession of Gold is Arbitrary: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Raw Material is not liable to Confiscation under Rule 25 of Central Excise Rules, 2002: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Confiscation-Raw-materials-Taxscan.jpg "Raw Material is not liable to Confiscation under Rule 25 of Central Excise Rules, 2002: CESTAT [Read Order]")