Delhi Court grants Bail to person accused of Smuggling Gold worth Rs.41.95 Cr [Read Order]
The Patiala House Court granted the bail to a person accused of Smuggling Gold worth Rs.41.95 Crores. The applicant, Neeraj Varshney submitted...
![Madras HC quashes plea for enhancing Penalty imposed on Customs House Agent for Misdeclaration of Goods [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Justice-Vaidyanathan-Madras-High-Court-Plea-Penalty-Customs-House-Agent-Mis-Declaration-Of-Goods-Taxscan.jpeg "Madras HC quashes plea for enhancing Penalty imposed on Customs House Agent for Misdeclaration of Goods [Read Order]")
![High Court not empowered to waive Payment of Interest under Customs Act as it is a Statutory Imposition: Kerala High Court [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/High-Court-Payment-of-Interest-Customs-Act-Statutory-Imposition-Kerala-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "High Court not empowered to waive Payment of Interest under Customs Act as it is a Statutory Imposition: Kerala High Court [Read Judgment]")
![DRI Official not a Proper Officer to issue SCN under Customs Act, reiterates Supreme Court [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/DRI-Official-show-cause-notice-Customs-Act-Supreme-Court-Taxscan.jpg "DRI Official not a Proper Officer to issue SCN under Customs Act, reiterates Supreme Court [Read Order]")
![Karnataka HC orders for Appearance through Video Conference in response to Summons issued u/s 108 of Customs Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Customs-Act-Karnataka-high-court-Taxscan.jpg "Karnataka HC orders for Appearance through Video Conference in response to Summons issued u/s 108 of Customs Act [Read Order]")
Application u/s 110(1B) of Customs Act to draw Representative Samples of Seized Goods shall be filed before Executive Magistrate: Patiala House Court
The Patiala House Court, New Delhi, has held that an application under Section 110 (1B) of the Customs Act not maintainable before the Metropolitan Magistrate since the provision authorizes Executive...
![Levy of Penalty on Sole Proprietor along with Firm amount to Double Jeopardy: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Levy-of-Penalty-Sole-Proprietor-Firm-amount-Double-Jeopardy-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg "Levy of Penalty on Sole Proprietor along with Firm amount to Double Jeopardy: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Authorized Courier Prohibited from Opening and Verifying Contents of Imported Consignments: CESTAT quashes Revocation of Registration, Forfeiture of Security Deposit
The Customs, Excises, Service Taxes Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Delhi Bench while quashing the revocation of registration, forfeiture of security deposit ruled that the Authorized courier prohibited...
![Onus to prove Non-Smuggled nature of Seized Gold lies on the Possessor: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/smuggle-seized-gold-possessor-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg "Onus to prove Non-Smuggled nature of Seized Gold lies on the Possessor: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Time Limit for filing Refund Claim of SAD paid by Importer: CESTAT Larger Bench to consider Relief to Importer If Goods are not sold within One Year
The Customs, Excise, Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chandigarh Bench referred the issue of time limit prescribed for filing refund claim of SAD paid by the importer to the larger bench so...
Circular can’t deny the benefit offered under Statutory Provisions: Madras High Court allows Refund [Read Order]
The Madras High Court while allowing the refund ruled that the circular can not deny the benefit offered under Statutory Provisions. The petitioner, M/s.Chaizup Beverages LLP is an exporter of tea...
![Circular can’t deny the benefit offered under Statutory Provisions: Madras High Court allows Refund [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Statutory-Provisions-madras-high-court-refund-taxscan.jpeg "Circular can’t deny the benefit offered under Statutory Provisions: Madras High Court allows Refund [Read Order]")
Confiscation permissible only when Goods Imported are Contrary to Prohibition under Customs Act, 1962: CESTAT deletes Redemption Fine, Penalty
The Customs, Excises and Service Taxes Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Bangalore Bench while deleting the redemption fine and penalty reiterated that the Confiscation permissible only when the goods...
