![Delhi HC Holds DRI Officers as Proper Authorities under Section 28: Restores Microsoft India’s Customs Appeals for Merit Hearing [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/01/500x300_2101584-delhi-hc-holds-dri-officers-proper-authorities-under-section-28-restores-microsoft-india-customs-appeals-for-merit-hearing-txn.webp "Delhi HC Holds DRI Officers as Proper Authorities under Section 28: Restores Microsoft India’s Customs Appeals for Merit Hearing [Read Order]")
Delhi HC Holds DRI Officers as Proper Authorities under Section 28: Restores Microsoft India’s Customs Appeals for Merit Hearing [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court held that officers of the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) are indeed “proper officers” under Section 28 of the...
![Penalty on Co-Noticee u/s 112(a) of Customs Act Set Aside by CESTAT: Mere Classification Dispute Not Grounds for Confiscation [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/31/250x150_2101252-cestat-mumbai-penalty-on-co-noticee-customs-act-taxscan.webp "Penalty on Co-Noticee u/s 112(a) of Customs Act Set Aside by CESTAT: Mere Classification Dispute Not Grounds for Confiscation [Read Order]")
![Dismissal of Customs Appeal on Limitation Set Aside: Madras HC Allows Reconsideration of Duty Drawback Claim Upon Full Deposit [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/04/250x150_2059161-dismissal-of-customs-appeal-on-limitation-customs-appeal-customs-appeal-on-limitation-taxscan.webp "Dismissal of Customs Appeal on Limitation Set Aside: Madras HC Allows Reconsideration of Duty Drawback Claim Upon Full Deposit [Read Order]")
![Delhi HC directs CESTAT to decide Customs Appeal on Merit, Sets Aside Remand Orders [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Delhi-High-Court-CESTAT-delhi-customs-appeal-remand-orders-taxscan.jpg "Delhi HC directs CESTAT to decide Customs Appeal on Merit, Sets Aside Remand Orders [Read Order]")
CESTAT Competent to Reject Customs Appeal for Non-Compliance of Pre-Deposit u/s 129E: Delhi HC [Read Order]
A Division Bench of the Delhi High Court has held that the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) is competent to reject Customs Appeals for non-compliance with the Pre-deposit...
![CESTAT Competent to Reject Customs Appeal for Non-Compliance of Pre-Deposit u/s 129E: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/CESTAT-Customs-Appeal-Delhi-HC-CESTAT-Competent-to-Reject-Customs-Appeal-for-Non-Compliance-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT Competent to Reject Customs Appeal for Non-Compliance of Pre-Deposit u/s 129E: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
Kerala HC directs Conditional Release of Seized Gold and Gold Items in-spite of Customs Appeals by Revenue [Read Order]
The Kerala High Court has ruled in favour of the assessees, in a customs case where the gold seized were not released despite favorable ruling in the order-in-original. The Single Bench of Kerala...
444 Days Delay In Filing Customs Appeal: Dismisses Appeal in Absence of Satisfactory Reason for Delay [Read Order]
The Supreme Court in a recent case dismissed the appeal filed for condoning a delay of 444 days for filing a Customs Appeal. The two-judge bench found that in the absence of any satisfactory reason...
Restoration Application on Customs Appeal filed after 5 years from dismissal Date without any Justifying Reason: Kerala HC Dismisses Writ Petition [Read Order]
The Kerala High Court dismissed the writ petition as the restoration application on customs appeal filed after 5 years from the dismissal date without any justifying reason. Yasir Ibnu Muhammed,...
![Restoration Application on Customs Appeal filed after 5 years from dismissal Date without any Justifying Reason: Kerala HC Dismisses Writ Petition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Restoration-Application-Customs-Appeal-Kerala-HC-Dismisses-Writ-Petition-Kerala-HC-taxscan-1.jpg "Restoration Application on Customs Appeal filed after 5 years from dismissal Date without any Justifying Reason: Kerala HC Dismisses Writ Petition [Read Order]")
Delay in filing Customs Appeal by Sick Company during pendency of Matter before BIFR is 'Reasonable': CESTAT Condones Delay of 2644 Days [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), while condoning a delay of 2644 days, has held that the delay in filing appeal by a sick company during the period...
![Delay in filing Customs Appeal by Sick Company during pendency of Matter before BIFR is Reasonable: CESTAT Condones Delay of 2644 Days [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Customs-Appeal-Sick-Company-BIFR-CESTAT-Condones-Delay-taxscan.jpeg "Delay in filing Customs Appeal by Sick Company during pendency of Matter before BIFR is Reasonable: CESTAT Condones Delay of 2644 Days [Read Order]")
![Bombay HC upholds Validity of Provision mandating Pre-Deposit on Customs Appeals [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Bombay-HC-Provision-mandating-Pre-Deposit-Customs-Appeals-taxscan.jpeg "Bombay HC upholds Validity of Provision mandating Pre-Deposit on Customs Appeals [Read Order]")