![CESTAT Quashes Penalty on Diamond Firm Director: No Proof of Misdeclaration or Overvaluation in Exports [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/19/500x300_2050408-penalty.webp "CESTAT Quashes Penalty on Diamond Firm Director: No Proof of Misdeclaration or Overvaluation in Exports [Read Order]")
CESTAT Quashes Penalty on Diamond Firm Director: No Proof of Misdeclaration or Overvaluation in Exports [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that no penalty could be imposed on a diamond company...
![Moisture and Ash Content Not Tested Properly for Areca Nuts’ Raw or Roasted Classification: Madras HC Remands Matter to Customs Commissioner [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/13/250x150_2043785-madras-hc-areca-nuts-raw-roasted-customs-commissioner-taxscan.webp "Moisture and Ash Content Not Tested Properly for Areca Nuts’ Raw or Roasted Classification: Madras HC Remands Matter to Customs Commissioner [Read Order]")
![Madras HC Quashes Customs Order for Denial of Duty Drawback Claim of 2015 Without Issuing Mandatory Deficiency Memo u/r 13(3)(a) [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/13/250x150_2043684-customs-order-madras-hc-mandatory-deficiency-memo-taxscan.webp "Madras HC Quashes Customs Order for Denial of Duty Drawback Claim of 2015 Without Issuing Mandatory Deficiency Memo u/r 13(3)(a) [Read Order]")
![FinMin Removes Condition for Exemption on Bangalore Rose Onion under Customs [Read Notification]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/bangalor-onion-site-img.jpg "FinMin Removes Condition for Exemption on Bangalore Rose Onion under Customs [Read Notification]")
Supreme Court upholds Inclusion of Product Support Services by Coal India in Customs Duty Valuation [Read Judgement]
In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India recently affirmed that product support services provided by Coal India Limited are directly connected to the importation process and must be...
![Supreme Court upholds Inclusion of Product Support Services by Coal India in Customs Duty Valuation [Read Judgement]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/No-GST-GST-No-GST-Exemption-Abhivahan-Permission-Shulk-Forest-Department-Forest-Department-for-Clearance-taxscan.jpg "Supreme Court upholds Inclusion of Product Support Services by Coal India in Customs Duty Valuation [Read Judgement]")
CESTAT allows SAD Refund based on TR-6 Challans to Prove Duty Incidence Borne by Importer [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) found that TR-6 challans are enough evidence of the duty incidence suffered by the importer when ordering the customs...
![CESTAT allows SAD Refund based on TR-6 Challans to Prove Duty Incidence Borne by Importer [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/CESTAT-CESTAT-allows-SAD-Refund-SAD-Refund-TR-6-Challans-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT allows SAD Refund based on TR-6 Challans to Prove Duty Incidence Borne by Importer [Read Order]")
Relief for Nokia India: CESTAT allows Refund of Excess CVD, Rules Challenge to Original Assessment Not Mandatory [Read Order]
The Bangalore Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that a refund of excess Countervailing Duty (CVD) paid on imported goods can be granted even if the...
![Relief for Nokia India: CESTAT allows Refund of Excess CVD, Rules Challenge to Original Assessment Not Mandatory [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Nokia-India-CESTAT-Refund-of-Excess-CVD-Rules-Challenge-Original-Assessment-Mandatory-TAXSCAN.webp "Relief for Nokia India: CESTAT allows Refund of Excess CVD, Rules Challenge to Original Assessment Not Mandatory [Read Order]")
Setback for Royal Enfield: CESTAT Rejects ₹1.79 Cr Refund Claim on SIPCOT Charges Over 31-Day Delay [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that Royal Enfield Motors’ claim for refund of Rs. 1.79 crore in service tax paid on SIPCOT development...
![Setback for Royal Enfield: CESTAT Rejects ₹1.79 Cr Refund Claim on SIPCOT Charges Over 31-Day Delay [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Setback-Royal-Enfield-CESTAT-Rejects-Refund-Claim-SIPCOT-taxscan.jpg "Setback for Royal Enfield: CESTAT Rejects ₹1.79 Cr Refund Claim on SIPCOT Charges Over 31-Day Delay [Read Order]")