![Gauhati HC Condones 265-Day Delay in GST Appeal: Cites Procedural Delay by Govt Justified [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/29/500x300_2070271-gauhati-hc-condones-delay-gst-appeal-cites-procedural-delay-govt-justified-taxscan.webp "Gauhati HC Condones 265-Day Delay in GST Appeal: Cites Procedural Delay by Govt Justified [Read Order]")
Gauhati HC Condones 265-Day Delay in GST Appeal: Cites Procedural Delay by Govt Justified [Read Order]
The Gauhati High Court has condoned a 265-day delay in filing an appeal by the Principal Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) and...
![Suppression cannot be alleged by Dept when Service Tax on GTA Service not paid on Bonafide belief: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/27/250x150_2069690-gta-service-taxscan.webp "Suppression cannot be alleged by Dept when Service Tax on GTA Service not paid on Bonafide belief: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![CESTAT WEEKLY ROUND-UP [July 21 to July 26, 2025]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/26/250x150_2069523-cestat-weekly-round-up-taxscan.webp "CESTAT WEEKLY ROUND-UP [July 21 to July 26, 2025]")
![Supreme Court & High Courts Weekly Round-up [ July 5th to July 12th, 2025]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/13/250x150_2063385-supreme-court-high-courts-weekly-round-up-taxscan.webp "Supreme Court & High Courts Weekly Round-up [ July 5th to July 12th, 2025]")
![CESTAT WEEKLY ROUND-UP [July 06, 2025 to July 12, 2025]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/13/250x150_2063349-cestat-weekly-round-up-taxscan.webp "CESTAT WEEKLY ROUND-UP [July 06, 2025 to July 12, 2025]")
Benefit of Monetary Limits Guidelines Not Applicable In Dispute related to Classification of Product for Customs Duty: Delhi HC [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court has held that the benefit of monetary limits guidelines is not applicable in disputes relating to the product classification for customs duty. Read More: No Reasoned Appellate...
![Benefit of Monetary Limits Guidelines Not Applicable In Dispute related to Classification of Product for Customs Duty: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Benefit-of-Monetary-Limits-Guidelines-Dispute-related-to-Classification-Product-for-Customs-Duty-Delhi-HC-taxscan.jpg "Benefit of Monetary Limits Guidelines Not Applicable In Dispute related to Classification of Product for Customs Duty: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
CESTAT Allows Larsen & Toubro Ltd. to utilize common Cenvat Credit account for payment of Service Tax on output services provided [Read Order]
In a case, the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)Kolkata bench held that  Larsen & Toubro Limited, the appellant can utilize common Cenvat Credit account for payment of...
![CESTAT Allows Larsen & Toubro Ltd. to utilize common Cenvat Credit account for payment of Service Tax on output services provided [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/CESTAT-Cenvat-Credit-account-payment-of-Service-Tax-Service-Tax-Cenvat-Credit-account-for-payment-of-Service-Tax-payment-of-tax-on-excisable-goods-Service-Tax-on-output-services-capital-goods-Taxscan.jpg "CESTAT Allows Larsen & Toubro Ltd. to utilize common Cenvat Credit account for payment of Service Tax on output services provided [Read Order]")
![CESTAT Annual Digest 2024: Indirect Tax Cases [Part 9]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/CESTAT-CESTAT-Annual-Digest-2024-Indirect-Tax-Cases-Annual-Digest-2024-Customs-Excise-and-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Customs-Kolkata-Bench-of-CESTAT-service-tax-CESTAT-Benches-of-India-Taxscan.jpg "CESTAT Annual Digest 2024: Indirect Tax Cases [Part 9]")
Rule 8(3) Ultra Vires to 11AB (1) of Central Excise Act: Punjab & Haryana HC Allows Refund of Excessive Interest [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Punjab And Haryana High Court has held that Rule 8(3) ultra vires to section 11AB(1) of Central Excise Act, 1944 . The court directed the department to refund the amount...
Failure to Respond to initial Service Tax SCN not Intention to Suppress Facts: Karnataka HC [Read Order]
The Karnataka High Court recently held that omission to reply to the first Show-Cause Notice (SCN) issued to an Assessee by the Revenue Department does not constitute malintent to suppress facts in a...
![Failure to Respond to initial Service Tax SCN not Intention to Suppress Facts: Karnataka HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Karnataka-HC-Service-Tax-SCN-Karnataka-High-Court-Show-Cause-Notice-payment-of-Service-Tax-initial-Service-Tax-taxscan.jpg "Failure to Respond to initial Service Tax SCN not Intention to Suppress Facts: Karnataka HC [Read Order]")
Not Enough Evidence to Prove Illegal Procurement of Plastic Scrap from Nepal: CESTAT quashes Confiscation Order, Redemption Fine and reduces Penalty [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Kolkata bench of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) quashed the confiscation order and redemption fine, while reducing the penalty, stating that...
![Not Enough Evidence to Prove Illegal Procurement of Plastic Scrap from Nepal: CESTAT quashes Confiscation Order, Redemption Fine and reduces Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Waste-Collection-Property-Tax-Dues-Kerala-Govt-TAXSCAN.jpg "Not Enough Evidence to Prove Illegal Procurement of Plastic Scrap from Nepal: CESTAT quashes Confiscation Order, Redemption Fine and reduces Penalty [Read Order]")