Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
![Relief to Nagarjuna Oil Corporation, Section 271(1)(c) Penalty cannot be imposed on debatable issue: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Nagarjuna-Oil-Corporation-Nagarjuna-Oil-Penalty-debatable-issue-ITAT-taxscan-.jpg "Relief to Nagarjuna Oil Corporation, Section 271(1)(c) Penalty cannot be imposed on debatable issue: ITAT [Read Order]")
Relief to Nagarjuna Oil Corporation, Section 271(1)(c) Penalty cannot be imposed on debatable issue: ITAT [Read Order]
As a relief to Nagarjuna Oil corporation, the Chennai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) has held that Section 271(1)(c) of the...
![Revisional Jurisdiction cannot be invoked on Highly Debatable Issues: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Revisional-Jurisdiction-Debatable-Issues-ITAT-taxscan.jpeg "Revisional Jurisdiction cannot be invoked on Highly Debatable Issues: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Debatable issues cannot be Adjusted on mere Intimation u/s 143: ITAT allows Deduction u/s 80JJAA [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Debatable-issues-ITAT-Deduction-taxscan.jpg "Debatable issues cannot be Adjusted on mere Intimation u/s 143: ITAT allows Deduction u/s 80JJAA [Read Order]")
![Adjustment by way of Computer generated Automated Message u/s 143(l)(a) is a Debatable Issue: ITAT rejects Plea [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Adjustment-Computer-Debatable-Issue-ITAT-taxscan.jpeg "Adjustment by way of Computer generated Automated Message u/s 143(l)(a) is a Debatable Issue: ITAT rejects Plea [Read Order]")
![Adjustment under Section 143(1)(a) is not permissible on Debatable Issue: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Adjustment-permissible-debatable-issue-ITAT-taxscan.jpeg "Adjustment under Section 143(1)(a) is not permissible on Debatable Issue: ITAT [Read Order]")
A Decision on a Debatable issue is not ‘Mistake Apparent from Record’ for the Purpose of Rectification: ITAT [Read Order]
While elaborating the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal’s (ITAT) powers under section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the Mumbai bench of the Tribunal has held that such powers cannot be invoked in...
![A Decision on a Debatable issue is not ‘Mistake Apparent from Record’ for the Purpose of Rectification: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Debatable-issue-Apparent-Mistake-ITAT-ITAT.jpg "A Decision on a Debatable issue is not ‘Mistake Apparent from Record’ for the Purpose of Rectification: ITAT [Read Order]")
If AO has different view against an Order of High Court/ Tribunal on a Claim made Assessee, the Claim is Debatable: Bombay High Court [Read Judgment]
While hearing the case of Bajaj Auto Finance Ltd, a division bench of the Bombay High Court has held that if the Assessing Officer has a different view against an order of High Court or Tribunal on a...
![If AO has different view against an Order of High Court/ Tribunal on a Claim made Assessee, the Claim is Debatable: Bombay High Court [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Bombay-High-Court-2-Tax-Scan.jpg "If AO has different view against an Order of High Court/ Tribunal on a Claim made Assessee, the Claim is Debatable: Bombay High Court [Read Judgment]")