![Customs Dept must distinguish ‘Jewellery’ & ‘Personal ‘Jewellery’ while Considering Seizure: Delhi HC Orders Release of Gold on Condition of Re-Export [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Personal-gold-seized-1.jpg "Customs Dept must distinguish ‘Jewellery’ & ‘Personal ‘Jewellery’ while Considering Seizure: Delhi HC Orders Release of Gold on Condition of Re-Export [Read Order]")
Customs Dept must distinguish ‘Jewellery’ & ‘Personal ‘Jewellery’ while Considering Seizure: Delhi HC Orders Release of Gold on Condition of Re-Export [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court has ruled that the customs department must distinguish ‘Jewellery’ and ‘Personal jewellery’ while considering the seizure of...
![Approval Memo u/s 153D Silent on Issues Involved not Sustainable in Law: ITAT quashes ₹32L Income Tax Addition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Memo-site-img.jpg "Approval Memo u/s 153D Silent on Issues Involved not Sustainable in Law: ITAT quashes ₹32L Income Tax Addition [Read Order]")
![Delhi HC Upholds RPM for Distributor Reselling Unmodified Goods without Value Addition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Delhi-High-Court-Resale-Price-Method-India-RPM-transfer-pricing-case-TAXSCAN.jpeg "Delhi HC Upholds RPM for Distributor Reselling Unmodified Goods without Value Addition [Read Order]")
![Relief to Oriental Insurance: ITAT Upholds Deletion of Rs. 21.36 Crore Disallowance u/s 14A [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Relief-Oriental-Insurance-ITAT-Deletion-of-Crore-Disallowance-taxscan.jpg "Relief to Oriental Insurance: ITAT Upholds Deletion of Rs. 21.36 Crore Disallowance u/s 14A [Read Order]")
![Advertisement, Marketing and Promotion expenditure incurred not constitute an “international transaction” u/s 92F of Income Tax Act: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Delhi-High-Court-Income-tax-Income-tax-act-TAXSCAN.jpg "Advertisement, Marketing and Promotion expenditure incurred not constitute an “international transaction” u/s 92F of Income Tax Act: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
Customs Dept Fails to issue SCN in Time: Delhi HC Directs Release of Gold Seized from Minor at IGI Airport [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Delhi High Court directed the Commissioner of Customs to release gold bangles seized from a minor passenger at IGI Airport, New Delhi, as the department failed to issue a show...
![Customs Dept Fails to issue SCN in Time: Delhi HC Directs Release of Gold Seized from Minor at IGI Airport [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/CESTAT-SEZ-Act-No-Confiscation-of-Seized-Gold-Merely-LOA-Special-Economic-Zone-Noida-Special-Economic-Zone-NSEZ-DTA-Domestic-Tariff-Area-Allahabad-Bench-of-the-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg "Customs Dept Fails to issue SCN in Time: Delhi HC Directs Release of Gold Seized from Minor at IGI Airport [Read Order]")
Penalty u/s 270A for Misreporting without Proper Charge Specification Invalid: ITAT Deletes Rs. 38.05 Lakh Penalty [Read Order]
The Bangalore Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT)deleted the penalty of Rs. 38.05 lakh imposed on the assessee due to the failure of the Assessing Officer (AO) to clearly specify the...
![Penalty u/s 270A for Misreporting without Proper Charge Specification Invalid: ITAT Deletes Rs. 38.05 Lakh Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Penalty-Penalty-Section-270A-Misreporting-without-Proper-Charge-Specification-Invalid-Proper-Charge-Specification-taxscan.jpg "Penalty u/s 270A for Misreporting without Proper Charge Specification Invalid: ITAT Deletes Rs. 38.05 Lakh Penalty [Read Order]")
![Supreme Court & High Courts Weekly Round-up [April 12th to April 18th,2025]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Supreme-Court-High-Courts-Weekly-Round-up.jpg "Supreme Court & High Courts Weekly Round-up [April 12th to April 18th,2025]")
Taxpayer Previously Responded to GST SCN Sent via Portal, Cannot Plead Unawareness for Disputed AY: Delhi HC [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Delhi High Court held that a taxpayer who previously responded to GST notices served via the official portal and electronic communication cannot later claim unawareness of...
![Taxpayer Previously Responded to GST SCN Sent via Portal, Cannot Plead Unawareness for Disputed AY: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Show-cause-notice-TAXSCAN.jpg "Taxpayer Previously Responded to GST SCN Sent via Portal, Cannot Plead Unawareness for Disputed AY: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
Personal Gold Jewellery Worn at Family Event Abroad Seized at Airport: Delhi HC Orders Immediate Release [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Delhi High Court directed the Customs Department to release personal gold jewellery seized from a returning Indian couple, confirming that the items constituted personal...
![Personal Gold Jewellery Worn at Family Event Abroad Seized at Airport: Delhi HC Orders Immediate Release [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Personal-gold-seized.jpg "Personal Gold Jewellery Worn at Family Event Abroad Seized at Airport: Delhi HC Orders Immediate Release [Read Order]")
Inordinate 11-Year Delay in Adjudication Violates S. 11A(11) of Central Excise Act: Delhi HC Orders Release of Goods [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Delhi High Court quashed orders of confiscation and penalty issued under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, due to an inordinate delay of over 11 years in completing...
![Inordinate 11-Year Delay in Adjudication Violates S. 11A(11) of Central Excise Act: Delhi HC Orders Release of Goods [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Central-Excise-Act-Delhi-HC-taxscan.jpeg "Inordinate 11-Year Delay in Adjudication Violates S. 11A(11) of Central Excise Act: Delhi HC Orders Release of Goods [Read Order]")
Renting Not Taxable Before 2010 Retrospective Amendment, No Intent to Suppress Income: CESTAT Quashes Demand [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) quashed service tax demand ruling that the renting of immovable property was not a taxable service before the...
![Renting Not Taxable Before 2010 Retrospective Amendment, No Intent to Suppress Income: CESTAT Quashes Demand [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Retrospective-Amendment.jpg "Renting Not Taxable Before 2010 Retrospective Amendment, No Intent to Suppress Income: CESTAT Quashes Demand [Read Order]")