Delhi High Court
Delhi High Court, Delhi HC, High Court of Delhi,New Delhi high Court delhi high court orders judgements,delhi high court judges,delhi high court cause list,chief justice of delhi high court 2020,supreme court of india,delhi high court notification,delhi high court e filing,current chief justice of delhi high court
![Drawback on Exports Delivered to Dubai Instead of Russia: CESTAT Quashes Rs. 31.66 Lakh Disallowance, sets aside Confiscation Order [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/20/500x300_2113372-drawback-exports-delivered-dubai-instead-russia-cestat-taxscan.webp "Drawback on Exports Delivered to Dubai Instead of Russia: CESTAT Quashes Rs. 31.66 Lakh Disallowance, sets aside Confiscation Order [Read Order]")
Drawback on Exports Delivered to Dubai Instead of Russia: CESTAT Quashes Rs. 31.66 Lakh Disallowance, sets aside Confiscation Order [Read Order]
The Principal Bench of Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, held that export is complete once goods are taken out...
![Cigarette Packs Lacking Mandatory Declarations Had to be Destroyed, Not Auctioned: CESTAT sets aside Forfeiture [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/19/250x150_2113226-cigarette-packs-lacking-mandatory-declarations-had-destroyed-not-auctioned-cestat-sets-aside-forfeiture-taxscan.webp "Cigarette Packs Lacking Mandatory Declarations Had to be Destroyed, Not Auctioned: CESTAT sets aside Forfeiture [Read Order]")
![GST Fraud Writ Delayed Due to Unremoved Defects for 3 Months: Delhi HC Grants One-Time Liberty to File Statutory Appeal Beyond Limitation [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/19/250x150_2113195-gst-fraud-writ-delayed-due-unremoved-defects-delhi-hc-grants-one-time-liberty-file-statutory-appeal-beyond-limitation-taxscan.webp "GST Fraud Writ Delayed Due to Unremoved Defects for 3 Months: Delhi HC Grants One-Time Liberty to File Statutory Appeal Beyond Limitation [Read Order]")
![Customs Orders Must Bear Name and Designation of Officer Passing Them: Delhi HC Rejects Staff Shortage Justification [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/19/250x150_2113158-customs-orders-must-bear-name-designation-officer-passing-them-taxscan.webp "Customs Orders Must Bear Name and Designation of Officer Passing Them: Delhi HC Rejects Staff Shortage Justification [Read Order]")
Making Passenger approach Court for 21g Gold Ring Unreasonable: Delhi HC Slams ‘Waste of Customs Resources’, Imposes ₹5k Costs on Dept [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court condemned the Customs Department harshly for forcing a traveler to come to the court to request the release of a 21-gram gold band, calling the entire incident an unjustified...
![Making Passenger approach Court for 21g Gold Ring Unreasonable: Delhi HC Slams ‘Waste of Customs Resources’, Imposes ₹5k Costs on Dept [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/18/500x300_2112951-delhi-hc-gold-ring-taxscan.jfif "Making Passenger approach Court for 21g Gold Ring Unreasonable: Delhi HC Slams ‘Waste of Customs Resources’, Imposes ₹5k Costs on Dept [Read Order]")
Non-Communication of Extension u/s 28(9) Customs Act Does Not Invalidate Adjudication Process: Delhi HC [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Delhi High Court held that non-communication of an order granting extension of time under Section 28(9) of the Customs Act, 1962 does not invalidate the adjudication process,...
![Non-Communication of Extension u/s 28(9) Customs Act Does Not Invalidate Adjudication Process: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/17/500x300_2112860-481be4a6-3689-426e-a47a-d5bcb20d11b8.webp "Non-Communication of Extension u/s 28(9) Customs Act Does Not Invalidate Adjudication Process: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
AO’s Knowledge of ITAT Order Triggers Limitation u/s 153(2A): Supreme Court Declines to Interfere With Delhi HC Ruling Against Revenue [Read Judgement]
In a recent case, the Supreme Court declined to interfere and dismissed the Revenue’s SLP and upheld the ruling of the Delhi High Court that “knowledge” of an appellate order triggers statutory...
![AO’s Knowledge of ITAT Order Triggers Limitation u/s 153(2A): Supreme Court Declines to Interfere With Delhi HC Ruling Against Revenue [Read Judgement]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/16/500x300_2112629-itat-supreme-court-delhi-hc-taxscan.webp "AO’s Knowledge of ITAT Order Triggers Limitation u/s 153(2A): Supreme Court Declines to Interfere With Delhi HC Ruling Against Revenue [Read Judgement]")
IGST Refund on Exports cannot be denied on Ground of Alleged Excess ITC of Prior FY Without SCN: Delhi HC [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Delhi High Court held that refund of IGST on exports cannot be withheld merely on the ground of alleged excess availment of input tax credit of a prior financial year, in the...
![IGST Refund on Exports cannot be denied on Ground of Alleged Excess ITC of Prior FY Without SCN: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/12/500x300_2111698-igst-refund-exports-denied-ground-alleged-excess-itc-prior-fy-without-scn-delhi-hc-taxscan.webp "IGST Refund on Exports cannot be denied on Ground of Alleged Excess ITC of Prior FY Without SCN: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
![Failure to issue SCN within One Year: Delhi HC Orders Release of Seized Gold Jewellery [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/12/500x300_2111586-scn-delhi-hc-gold-jewellery-taxscan.webp "Failure to issue SCN within One Year: Delhi HC Orders Release of Seized Gold Jewellery [Read Order]")
Derived From’ Means First-Degree Nexus: Supreme Court Rejects NCDC’s Claim for Deduction u/s 36(1)(viii) of Income tax [Read Judgement]
The Supreme Court has clarified the phrase ‘Derived from’ in Section 36(1)(viii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The bench noted that the it requires a direct, first-degree nexus with the business of...
![Derived From’ Means First-Degree Nexus: Supreme Court Rejects NCDC’s Claim for Deduction u/s 36(1)(viii) of Income tax [Read Judgement]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/11/500x300_2111472-derived-nexus-supreme-court-rejects-ncdcs-claim-deduction-us-361viii-of-income-tax-taxscan.webp "Derived From’ Means First-Degree Nexus: Supreme Court Rejects NCDC’s Claim for Deduction u/s 36(1)(viii) of Income tax [Read Judgement]")
Income tax Deduction u/s 36(1)(viii) Limited to Profits ‘Derived From’ Long-Term Finance: Supreme Court says ‘No Deduction’ to Incidental or Ancillary income [Read Judgement]
The Supreme Court has ruled that the income-tax deduction under Section 36(1)(viii) of Income Tax Act, 1961 is available only on profits that are directly and strictly derived from the business of...
![Income tax Deduction u/s 36(1)(viii) Limited to Profits ‘Derived From’ Long-Term Finance: Supreme Court says ‘No Deduction’ to Incidental or Ancillary income [Read Judgement]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/11/500x300_2111464-income-tax-deduction-us-361viii-limited-profits-derived-from-long-term-finance-supreme-court-deduction-incidental-ancillary-income-taxscan.webp "Income tax Deduction u/s 36(1)(viii) Limited to Profits ‘Derived From’ Long-Term Finance: Supreme Court says ‘No Deduction’ to Incidental or Ancillary income [Read Judgement]")