![Non-Constitution of GST Appellate Tribunal Deprives LIC s Right to Appeal under BGST: Patna HC Directs to File Appeal u/s 112 [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Non-Constitution-GST-Appellate-Tribunal-GST-LIC-Appeal-BGST-Patna-High-Court-File-Appeal-Taxscan.jpg "Non-Constitution of GST Appellate Tribunal Deprives LIC s Right to Appeal under BGST: Patna HC Directs to File Appeal u/s 112 [Read Order]")
Non-Constitution of GST Appellate Tribunal Deprives LIC 's Right to Appeal under BGST: Patna HC Directs to File Appeal u/s 112 [Read Order]
In a recent judgment, the Patna High Court bench comprising of Acting Chief Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh and Justice Madhuresh Prasad observed...
![Addition Against Housewife for having Deposit of Rs.2,40,000/- during Demonetization Period is Against CBDT Circular: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Addition-Housewife-Deposit-Demonetization-Period-CBDT-Circular-ITAT-Income-Tax-taxscan.jpg "Addition Against Housewife for having Deposit of Rs.2,40,000/- during Demonetization Period is Against CBDT Circular: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Valuation of Goods on Eye Estimation not Prescribed u/s 15 of CGST: Allahabad HC directs to Refund GST Demand [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Valuation-of-Goods-CGST-Allahabad-HC-Refund-GST-Demand-TAXSCAN.jpg "Valuation of Goods on Eye Estimation not Prescribed u/s 15 of CGST: Allahabad HC directs to Refund GST Demand [Read Order]")
![Rajasthan GST Dept. Issues Guidelines for Refund of Late Fee and Deposit u/s 47 of the RGST Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Rajasthan-GST-Department-GST-Department-Guidelines-GST-Refund-Late-Fee-Deposit-RGST-Act-Taxscan.jpg "Rajasthan GST Dept. Issues Guidelines for Refund of Late Fee and Deposit u/s 47 of the RGST Act [Read Order]")
Indian citizen working as Travel Agent in Dubai need to Deposit pre-deposit u/s 29E of Customs Act for further proceedings: Gujarat HC [Read Order]
The Division Bench of Gujarat High court has held that the Indian citizen working as travel agent in Dubai need to deposit pre-deposit under Section 29E of customs Act for further proceedings. The...
![Indian citizen working as Travel Agent in Dubai need to Deposit pre-deposit u/s 29E of Customs Act for further proceedings: Gujarat HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Indian-citizen-Deposit-pre-deposit-Customs-Act-Customs-Gujarat-High-court-Taxscan.jpg "Indian citizen working as Travel Agent in Dubai need to Deposit pre-deposit u/s 29E of Customs Act for further proceedings: Gujarat HC [Read Order]")
Failure to Follow Procedure under Rule 142 (1A) of OGST Rules concludes the Deposit of Tax: Orissa HC [Read Order]
The High Court (HC) of Orissa has held that the tax demanded can’t be Contested when Assessee failed to follow the procedure under Rule 142 (1A) of OGST Rules. Shri D. Murali Mohan Patanaik, the...
MoF notifies amendments to National Savings Time Deposit Scheme and Kisan Vikas Patra Scheme with retrospective effect [Read Notification]
The Department of Economic Affairs at the Ministry of FInance has recently notified the amendments made to the National Savings Time Deposit Scheme and Kisan Vikas Patra Scheme. “The maturity...
Treating Advance Amount as Security Deposit: CESTAT finds No intention to evade Service Tax Payment [Read Order]
The New Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), found that there is no intention to evade service tax payment on treating advance amount as security deposit. ...
![Treating Advance Amount as Security Deposit: CESTAT finds No intention to evade Service Tax Payment [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Treating-Deposit-CESTAT-Service-Tax-Payment-TAXSCAN.jpg "Treating Advance Amount as Security Deposit: CESTAT finds No intention to evade Service Tax Payment [Read Order]")
Addition based on Unexplained Deposit becomes valid when Three conditions required u/s 68 not proved: Allahabad HC [Read Order]
The Allahabad High Court (HC) has held that an Addition based on an unexplained deposit becomes valid when Three conditions required under section 68 of the Income Tax Act,1961 are not proved. ...
![Addition based on Unexplained Deposit becomes valid when Three conditions required u/s 68 not proved: Allahabad HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Deposit-Allahabad-High-Court-taxscan.jpg "Addition based on Unexplained Deposit becomes valid when Three conditions required u/s 68 not proved: Allahabad HC [Read Order]")
Every Deposit during Demonetization period Not amounts to Unaccounted Cash, Addition u/s 68 not allowable: ITAT [Read Order]
Every deposit during demonetization period Not amounts to unaccounted cash , the Bangalore Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the addition u/s 68 not allowable The...
![Every Deposit during Demonetization period Not amounts to Unaccounted Cash, Addition u/s 68 not allowable: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Deposit-Demonetisation-Unaccounted-Cash-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Every Deposit during Demonetization period Not amounts to Unaccounted Cash, Addition u/s 68 not allowable: ITAT [Read Order]")
![An Addition on Unexplained Deposit deleted without Valid Document is not allowable: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Unexplained-Deposit-Document-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "An Addition on Unexplained Deposit deleted without Valid Document is not allowable: ITAT [Read Order]")