![Kopiko Classifiable as Sugar Confectionary: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Kopiko-Sugar-Confectionary-CESTAT-TAXSCAN1.jpg "Kopiko Classifiable as Sugar Confectionary: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Kopiko Classifiable as Sugar Confectionary: CESTAT [Read Order]
In a significant ruling , the Ahmedabad Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that 'Kopiko (cappuccino and...
![Marketing and Promotion Activities for FPCs Not Subject to Service Tax as Business Auxiliary Service: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/CESTAT-FPCS-marketing-promotion-tax-Service-Tax-on-Business-Auxiliary-TAXSCAN.jpg "Marketing and Promotion Activities for FPCs Not Subject to Service Tax as Business Auxiliary Service: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Make My Trip is facilitator between Hotel and Customer for short-term accommodation service: CESTAT allows benefit of Abatement Notification [Read Order]
The New Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) allowed benefit of abatement notification and noted that Make My Trip is facilitator between hotel and...
![Make My Trip is facilitator between Hotel and Customer for short-term accommodation service: CESTAT allows benefit of Abatement Notification [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Make-My-Trip-Abatement-Notification-Short-Term-Accommodation-Service-CESTAT-Delhi-CESTAT-on-hotel-services-taxscan.jpg "Make My Trip is facilitator between Hotel and Customer for short-term accommodation service: CESTAT allows benefit of Abatement Notification [Read Order]")
No Retrospective Effect of Two Two-year Time Period on Export Obligation Extension as EPCG Committee has not Stated Any Period: CESTAT [Read Order]
While considering a bunch of appeals, the Chennai Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the retrospective effect of two years does not apply to export obligation...
![No Retrospective Effect of Two Two-year Time Period on Export Obligation Extension as EPCG Committee has not Stated Any Period: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/CESTAT-Obligation-Extension-EPCG-Committee-Chennai-Customs-taxscan.jpg "No Retrospective Effect of Two Two-year Time Period on Export Obligation Extension as EPCG Committee has not Stated Any Period: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Rejection of SVLDR Scheme because of unreasonable errors is not valid: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/SVLDR-Scheme-SVLDR-Service-Tax-Orissa-High-Court-CGST-Act-taxscan.jpg "Rejection of SVLDR Scheme because of unreasonable errors is not valid: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Relief to Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited (MTNL): Delhi HC set aside Demand of Service Tax of Rs. 56.61 Crores
As a relief to Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited (MTNL),the Delhi High Court set aside the demand for service tax of Rs. 56.61 crores since the surrender of any right to use the spectrum before...
Services to Domestic Vendors by Procuring Orders from Foreign Companies rendered are classifiable under SSBC: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chennai Bench ruled that the services to domestic vendors by procuring orders from foreign companies rendered are classifiable under...
![Services to Domestic Vendors by Procuring Orders from Foreign Companies rendered are classifiable under SSBC: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Services-to-Domestic-Vendors-Foreign-Companies-SSBC-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Services to Domestic Vendors by Procuring Orders from Foreign Companies rendered are classifiable under SSBC: CESTAT [Read Order]")
No Records found on Receipt of Unaccounted Cash or Incriminating Material during Search: ITAT deletes Additions [Read Order]
Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) presided over by Dr. B. R. R. Kumar (Accountant Member) and Yogesh Kumar US (Judicial Member) dismissed the appeals filed by the Revenue on the...
![No Records found on Receipt of Unaccounted Cash or Incriminating Material during Search: ITAT deletes Additions [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/No-Records-found-on-Receipt-of-Unaccounted-Cash-or-Incriminating-Material-during-Search-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "No Records found on Receipt of Unaccounted Cash or Incriminating Material during Search: ITAT deletes Additions [Read Order]")
![Rule 26 not applicable to Non-Functional Directors, Penalty not sustained: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/non-functional-directors-Penalty-CESTAT-taxscan.jpeg "Rule 26 not applicable to Non-Functional Directors, Penalty not sustained: CESTAT [Read Order]")