![Eligibility for S. 80P Deduction Depends on Primary Business of Cooperative Society, Not Incidental Dealings with Non-Members: ITAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/13/500x300_2086030-2051537-itat-itat-rajkot-section-80p-deduction-taxscan.webp "Eligibility for S. 80P Deduction Depends on Primary Business of Cooperative Society, Not Incidental Dealings with Non-Members: ITAT [Read Order]")
Eligibility for S. 80P Deduction Depends on Primary Business of Cooperative Society, Not Incidental Dealings with Non-Members: ITAT [Read Order]
The Bangalore Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the eligibility for deduction under Section 80P must be determined with...
![Payments for Multiple Bills Below Rs. 20,000 Each Do Not Attract S. 40A(3) Disallowance: ITAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/26/250x150_2080794-disallowance-itat-multiple-bills-tax-taxscan.webp "Payments for Multiple Bills Below Rs. 20,000 Each Do Not Attract S. 40A(3) Disallowance: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Disallowance of ₹1.87 Crore MAT Credit in Schindler India’s Return of Income: ITAT Remands matter to AO to Verify & Allow Necessary Credit [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/26/250x150_2080578-2060606-itat-ruling-income-tax-tribunal-tax-disallowance-taxscan.webp "Disallowance of ₹1.87 Crore MAT Credit in Schindler India’s Return of Income: ITAT Remands matter to AO to Verify & Allow Necessary Credit [Read Order]")
![Club and Entrance Fees Disallowance u/s 37: ITAT Upholds CIT(A)s Order Allowing Expenditure for MRF as Reasonable for Business [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/23/250x150_2079887-mrf-disallowance-itat-taxscan.webp "Club and Entrance Fees Disallowance u/s 37: ITAT Upholds CIT(A)s Order Allowing Expenditure for MRF as Reasonable for Business [Read Order]")
Expenditure on Subsidiary for Commercial Expediency Allowable as Business Deduction: Bombay HC in Mahindra Case [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Bombay High Court held that expenditure incurred by a company on its subsidiary for commercial expediency is allowable as a business deduction. Mahindra & Mahindra...
![Expenditure on Subsidiary for Commercial Expediency Allowable as Business Deduction: Bombay HC in Mahindra Case [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/18/500x300_2078050-business-deduction-bombay-hc-in-mahindra-case-taxscan.webp "Expenditure on Subsidiary for Commercial Expediency Allowable as Business Deduction: Bombay HC in Mahindra Case [Read Order]")
Mere Disallowance of Capitalized Interest Not Misreporting: ITAT deletes Income Tax Penalty u/s 270A [Read Order]
The Jaipur Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted the penalty imposed under section 270A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and held that mere disallowance of the capitalized ...
![Mere Disallowance of Capitalized Interest Not Misreporting: ITAT deletes Income Tax Penalty u/s 270A [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/16/500x300_2077533-mere-disallowance-capitalized-interest-itat-income-tax-penalty-taxscan.webp "Mere Disallowance of Capitalized Interest Not Misreporting: ITAT deletes Income Tax Penalty u/s 270A [Read Order]")
Bonafide Error in Claiming 15% Depreciation Instead of 7.5%: ITAT finds Assessee Eligible for Additional Depreciation u/s 32(1)(iia) [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) held that a bonafide error in claiming 15% depreciation instead of the eligible 7.5% on plant and machinery used for less than 180 days ...
![Bonafide Error in Claiming 15% Depreciation Instead of 7.5%: ITAT finds Assessee Eligible for Additional Depreciation u/s 32(1)(iia) [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/10/500x300_2075264-bonafide-error-bonafide-error-in-claiming-15-depreciation-taxscan.webp "Bonafide Error in Claiming 15% Depreciation Instead of 7.5%: ITAT finds Assessee Eligible for Additional Depreciation u/s 32(1)(iia) [Read Order]")
Section 14A Disallowance Restricted to Exempt Income Investments: ITAT Upholds CIT(A)’s Order, Rejects Retrospective Amendment Application [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled that disallowance should be restricted to investments that actually yielded exempt income, rejecting the Revenue’s contention for ...
![Section 14A Disallowance Restricted to Exempt Income Investments: ITAT Upholds CIT(A)’s Order, Rejects Retrospective Amendment Application [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/30/500x300_2070951-itat-mumbai-section-14a-disallowance-income-investments-taxscan.webp "Section 14A Disallowance Restricted to Exempt Income Investments: ITAT Upholds CIT(A)’s Order, Rejects Retrospective Amendment Application [Read Order]")
Disallowance u/s 14A Cannot Be Added Back While Computing Book Profits u/s 115JB of Income Tax: ITAT [Read Order]
The Chandigarh Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has ruled that disallowance under Section 14A cannot be added back while computing book profits under Section 115JB of the Income ...
![Disallowance u/s 14A Cannot Be Added Back While Computing Book Profits u/s 115JB of Income Tax: ITAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/30/500x300_2070742-disallowance-ao-taxscan.webp "Disallowance u/s 14A Cannot Be Added Back While Computing Book Profits u/s 115JB of Income Tax: ITAT [Read Order]")
Disallowance of ₹24.22 Lakh Towards ESI/PF u/s 36(1)(va): ITAT Condones Delay, Remands Matter to CPC for Verification [Read Order]
The Lucknow Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ), condoned the delay in filing an appeal against a disallowance of ₹24.22 lakh towards Employees’ State Insurance/Provident Fund (ESI/PF)...
![Disallowance of ₹24.22 Lakh Towards ESI/PF u/s 36(1)(va): ITAT Condones Delay, Remands Matter to CPC for Verification [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/28/500x300_2070088-disallowance-disallowance-of-2422-lakh-towards-esi-pf-esi-pf-section-361va-taxscan.webp "Disallowance of ₹24.22 Lakh Towards ESI/PF u/s 36(1)(va): ITAT Condones Delay, Remands Matter to CPC for Verification [Read Order]")
ITAT Allows HRA Exemption of ₹7.8 Lakh for Salaried Employee, Slams CPC for Erroneous Disallowance [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Ahmedabad bench has ruled in favor of a salaried employee, allowing a house rent allowance (HRA) exemption of ₹7.8 lakh and criticizing the Centralized...
![ITAT Allows HRA Exemption of ₹7.8 Lakh for Salaried Employee, Slams CPC for Erroneous Disallowance [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/24/500x300_2068419-itat-itat-allows-hra-exemption-hra-exemption-hra-exemption-of-78-lakh-for-salaried-employee-taxscan.webp "ITAT Allows HRA Exemption of ₹7.8 Lakh for Salaried Employee, Slams CPC for Erroneous Disallowance [Read Order]")