![S.75(5) of GST Act Violated By Denying Opportunity to be Heard: Madras HC Quashes Adverse GST Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/S.755-of-GST-Act-Madras-HC-GST-Order-TAXSCAN.jpg "S.75(5) of GST Act Violated By Denying Opportunity to be Heard: Madras HC Quashes Adverse GST Order [Read Order]")
S.75(5) of GST Act Violated By Denying Opportunity to be Heard: Madras HC Quashes Adverse GST Order [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court quashed an adverse GST order against an assessee observing a violation of the GST Act's provisions...
![GST Notices only uploaded on GST Portal, No Proper Opportunity Given: Madras HC directs Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/GST-Madras-HC-madras-high-court-GST-Notices-GST-Notices-Only-Uploaded-on-GST-Portal-madras-highcourt-on-gst-notice-madras-gst-notices-gst-news-madras-hc-news-madras-high-court-news-taxscan.jpg "GST Notices only uploaded on GST Portal, No Proper Opportunity Given: Madras HC directs Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]")
![Statutory Right to challenge Order passed u/s 129(3) of GST Act cannot be defeated due to Technical glitches: Calcutta HC Restores Matter to Adjudicating Authority [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/GST-Calcutta-HC-Adjudicating-Authority-Calcutta-High-Court-Section-129-3-of-the-Goods-and-Service-Tax-Calcutta-HC-Restores-GST-Act-Taxscan.webp "Statutory Right to challenge Order passed u/s 129(3) of GST Act cannot be defeated due to Technical glitches: Calcutta HC Restores Matter to Adjudicating Authority [Read Order]")
![Madras HC finds GST SCN Reply Inadequate and not Self Explanatory, allows to Contest Order on 10% Pre-deposit [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/madras-high-court-madras-highcourt-news-madras-hc-madras-hc-news-gst-gst-news-goods-and-service-tax-scn-show-cause-notice-scn-news-taxscan.jpg "Madras HC finds GST SCN Reply Inadequate and not Self Explanatory, allows to Contest Order on 10% Pre-deposit [Read Order]")
Taxpayers Must Regularly Monitor GST Portal; Unawareness as Justification Not Convincing: Madras HC [Read Order]
The Madras High Court, while remanding the matter on 10% Pre-deposit condition, observed that the taxpayers must regularly monitor the Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) portal. A Single bench of...
![Taxpayers Must Regularly Monitor GST Portal; Unawareness as Justification Not Convincing: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/GST-Portal-GST-TAX-NEWS-Madras-High-Court-TAXSCAN.jpg "Taxpayers Must Regularly Monitor GST Portal; Unawareness as Justification Not Convincing: Madras HC [Read Order]")
Not a case of Irreparable Loss when Party can be Compensated in terms of Money: Kerala HC upholds Payment of 30% of Disputed Tax under KVAT Act [Read Order]
In a major ruling the Kerala High Court observed that “When a party can be compensated in terms of money, it cannot be a case of suffering irreparable loss” and thereby upheld the payment of 30% of...
![Not a case of Irreparable Loss when Party can be Compensated in terms of Money: Kerala HC upholds Payment of 30% of Disputed Tax under KVAT Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Not-case-Irreparable-Loss-Party-Compensated-Money-Kerala-HC-Payment-Disputed-Tax-KVAT-Act-TAXSCAN.jpg "Not a case of Irreparable Loss when Party can be Compensated in terms of Money: Kerala HC upholds Payment of 30% of Disputed Tax under KVAT Act [Read Order]")
![GST recovery in Absence of GSTAT: Orissa HC Directs to pay 20% of Disputed Tax [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/GST-recovery-GST-recovery-GSTAT-GST-recovery-in-Absence-of-GSTAT-Orissa-High-Court-taxscan-1.jpg "GST recovery in Absence of GSTAT: Orissa HC Directs to pay 20% of Disputed Tax [Read Order]")
Payment of Tax at 12% at time of Filing Returns and 10% of Disputed Tax as Pre-Deposit: Calcutta HC Remands Matter [Read Order]
A Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court remanded back the matter to Assistant Commissioner as payment of tax at the rate of 12% was made at the time of filing returns and 10% of the disputed tax...
Remand back of matter to AO to calculate Disputed Tax and not Fresh Adjudication: Bombay HC quashes action of PCIT [Read Order]
In a recent ruling the Bombay High Court quashed the action of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax ( PCIT ) as the remand back of the matter to the Assessing Officer (AO) was to calculate...
![Remand back of matter to AO to calculate Disputed Tax and not Fresh Adjudication: Bombay HC quashes action of PCIT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/AO-disputed-tax-fresh-adjudication-Bombay-High-Court-PCIT-Taxscan.jpg "Remand back of matter to AO to calculate Disputed Tax and not Fresh Adjudication: Bombay HC quashes action of PCIT [Read Order]")
Vivad Se Vishwas Act is a Beneficial Legislation, Dept cannot deny Benefit If Assessee is eligible for the Scheme: Bombay HC [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court ruled that Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas (DTVSV) Act, 2020 is a Beneficial Legislation, Dept cannot deny the Benefit If Assesee is eligible for the Scheme. The...
![Vivad Se Vishwas Act is a Beneficial Legislation, Dept cannot deny Benefit If Assessee is eligible for the Scheme: Bombay HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Vivad-Se-Vishwas-Act-Beneficial-Legislation-Assessee-Scheme-Bombay-High-Court-taxscan.jpeg "Vivad Se Vishwas Act is a Beneficial Legislation, Dept cannot deny Benefit If Assessee is eligible for the Scheme: Bombay HC [Read Order]")