DRI seizes 48.20 kg Gold Paste worth 25.26 crore under Operation Goldmine at Surat International Airport
As part of Operation Goldmine, the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) confiscated 48.20 kg of Gold Paste at Surat International Airport. This...
Mis Declaration of Brand on Import Documents of Paper Cup Machine due to Erroneous Dispatch by Supplier: CESTAT sets aside Confiscation under Customs ActÂ
The Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has viewed the misdeclaration of the brand on import documents of paper cup machine due to erroneous dispatch by...
Officers of DRI are not proper officers for purposes of Section 28 of Customs Act: ITAT quashes Addition Based on Information by DRI [Read Order]
The Jaipur bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) while quashing the addition made by the assessing officer based on information by the Director of Revenue Intelligence (DRI), held that...
![Officers of DRI are not proper officers for purposes of Section 28 of Customs Act: ITAT quashes Addition Based on Information by DRI [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Officers-of-DRI-proper-officers-Customs-Act-ITAT-Information-by-DRI-taxscan.jpg "Officers of DRI are not proper officers for purposes of Section 28 of Customs Act: ITAT quashes Addition Based on Information by DRI [Read Order]")
![Customs AAR Valid despite On-going Investigation by DRI: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Customs-AAR-Investigation-DRI-Delhi-HighCourt-taxscan.jpg "Customs AAR Valid despite On-going Investigation by DRI: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
Imposing Penalty u/s 114A is not permissible in Absence of Collusion, Wilful Misstatement, Suppression of facts, or even any Duty Liability: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that imposing penalty under section 114A is not permissible in the absence of collusion, wilful...
![Imposing Penalty u/s 114A is not permissible in Absence of Collusion, Wilful Misstatement, Suppression of facts, or even any Duty Liability: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Imposing-Penalty-misstatement-duty-liability-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Imposing Penalty u/s 114A is not permissible in Absence of Collusion, Wilful Misstatement, Suppression of facts, or even any Duty Liability: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Imposing Penalty u/s 114A is not permissible in Absence of Collusion, Wilful Misstatement, Suppression of Facts or even any Duty Liability: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that imposing penalty under section 114A is not permissible in the absence of collusion, wilful...
![Imposing Penalty u/s 114A is not permissible in Absence of Collusion, Wilful Misstatement, Suppression of Facts or even any Duty Liability: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Imposing-Penalty-u-s-114A-absence-of-collusion-wilful-misstatement-suppression-of-facts-duty-liability-CESTAT.jpg "Imposing Penalty u/s 114A is not permissible in Absence of Collusion, Wilful Misstatement, Suppression of Facts or even any Duty Liability: CESTAT [Read Order]")