Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
![Charge of Clandestine Removal to be framed only on the basis of Substantial Evidence: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Charge-of-Clandestine-Removal-Substantial-Evidence-CESTAT-taxscan.jpeg "Charge of Clandestine Removal to be framed only on the basis of Substantial Evidence: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Charge of Clandestine Removal to be framed only on the basis of Substantial Evidence: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Allahabad bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), held that the charge of Clandestine removal is to be framed...
![Interest of Refund: Dept cannot invoke Benefit of Extended Limitation in the absence of Fraud on the part of Taxpayer, rules CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Interest-Refund-department-Extended-Limitation-Fraud-Taxpayer-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpeg "Interest of Refund: Dept cannot invoke Benefit of Extended Limitation in the absence of Fraud on the part of Taxpayer, rules CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Bank can’t be prevented from Exercising Rights as Secured Creditor on pretext of Debt to Excise Department: SC grants Relief to Kotak Mahindra Bank [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Bank-debt-Excise-Department-Kotak-Mahindra-Bank-Taxscan.jpg "Bank can’t be prevented from Exercising Rights as Secured Creditor on pretext of Debt to Excise Department: SC grants Relief to Kotak Mahindra Bank [Read Order]")
![Central Excise dues can’t be recovered from Wife’s Property on default of the Husband’s Proprietary Firms: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Central-Excise-recovered-wifes-property-default-husbands-proprietary-firms-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg "Central Excise dues can’t be recovered from Wife’s Property on default of the Husband’s Proprietary Firms: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Person bearing Excise Duty, not leviable in law is entitled to claim refund subject to limitation prescribed in Section 11B: Madras HC [Read Judgment]
The Madras High court while dismissing the appeal held that the person who has borne the incidence of Excise Duty, which was not leviable in law is entitled to claim refund of the same, subject to...
![Person bearing Excise Duty, not leviable in law is entitled to claim refund subject to limitation prescribed in Section 11B: Madras HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Excise-Duty-law-claim-refund-Section-11B-Madras-High-Court-Taxscan.jpeg "Person bearing Excise Duty, not leviable in law is entitled to claim refund subject to limitation prescribed in Section 11B: Madras HC [Read Judgment]")
Allegation of Clandestine Removal can’t be upheld only on the basis of Mere Entries made in certain Private Record recovered from Security: CESTAT [Read Order]
In the case of M/s, Mohit Engineering versus CCE, the Delhi bench of Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT )Â ruled that allegation of clandestine removal cannot be upheld only...
![Allegation of Clandestine Removal can’t be upheld only on the basis of Mere Entries made in certain Private Record recovered from Security: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg "Allegation of Clandestine Removal can’t be upheld only on the basis of Mere Entries made in certain Private Record recovered from Security: CESTAT [Read Order]")
