![Bombay HC upholds Cancellation of Liquor License by Excise Commissioner in application of Legal Heirs of Deceased Partner [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Bombay-HC-upholds-Cancellation-of-Liquor-License-Bombay-High-Court-Cancellation-of-Liquor-License-Liquor-License-Excise-Commissioner-Legal-Heirs-Deceased-Partner-taxscan.jpeg "Bombay HC upholds Cancellation of Liquor License by Excise Commissioner in application of Legal Heirs of Deceased Partner [Read Order]")
Bombay HC upholds Cancellation of Liquor License by Excise Commissioner in application of Legal Heirs of Deceased Partner [Read Order]
A Single Bench of Justice Bharat P. Deshpande of Bombay High Court upheld the cancellation of the liquor license by the Excise Commissioner in the...
![Excise Dept Cannot Make Computation of Tax Liability Afresh Since Past Liability on DICGC was Clarified by CBIC: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Excise-Dept-Computation-of-Tax-Liability-Tax-DICGC-CBIC-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg "Excise Dept Cannot Make Computation of Tax Liability Afresh Since Past Liability on DICGC was Clarified by CBIC: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Excise Matter remanded back to Single Bench: Delhi HC allows Writ on Exhaustion of all Alternate Remedies [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Excise-Delhi-HC-Writ-Writ-Petition-taxscan.jpg "Excise Matter remanded back to Single Bench: Delhi HC allows Writ on Exhaustion of all Alternate Remedies [Read Order]")
Charge of Clandestine Removal to be framed only on the basis of Substantial Evidence: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Allahabad bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), held that the charge of Clandestine removal is to be framed only on the basis of substantial evidence in favour...
![Charge of Clandestine Removal to be framed only on the basis of Substantial Evidence: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Charge-of-Clandestine-Removal-Substantial-Evidence-CESTAT-taxscan.jpeg "Charge of Clandestine Removal to be framed only on the basis of Substantial Evidence: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Interest of Refund: Dept cannot invoke Benefit of Extended Limitation in the absence of Fraud on the part of Taxpayer, rules CESTAT [Read Order]
The Delhi bench of the CESTAT has held that the department cannot avail the benefit of extended period of limitation is not available to Revenue in the present matters, there being no element of...
![Interest of Refund: Dept cannot invoke Benefit of Extended Limitation in the absence of Fraud on the part of Taxpayer, rules CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Interest-Refund-department-Extended-Limitation-Fraud-Taxpayer-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpeg "Interest of Refund: Dept cannot invoke Benefit of Extended Limitation in the absence of Fraud on the part of Taxpayer, rules CESTAT [Read Order]")
Bank can’t be prevented from Exercising Rights as Secured Creditor on pretext of Debt to Excise Department: SC grants Relief to Kotak Mahindra Bank [Read Order]
In a major relief to Kotak Mahindra Bank, the Supreme Court while dismissing a decade-long dispute held that the Bank cannot be prevented from exercising rights as a secured creditor on the pretext...
![Bank can’t be prevented from Exercising Rights as Secured Creditor on pretext of Debt to Excise Department: SC grants Relief to Kotak Mahindra Bank [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Bank-debt-Excise-Department-Kotak-Mahindra-Bank-Taxscan.jpg "Bank can’t be prevented from Exercising Rights as Secured Creditor on pretext of Debt to Excise Department: SC grants Relief to Kotak Mahindra Bank [Read Order]")
ITAT directs BPC to produce Excise Records and permission from Excise department to set up bonded Warehouse within Factory premises
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Allahabad Bench directed the assessee, Bharat Pumps & Compressors Ltd. (BPC) to produce excise records and permission from the excise department to...
Central Excise dues can’t be recovered from Wife’s Property on default of the Husband’s Proprietary Firms: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Customs, Excises, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Ahmedabad Bench ruled that the Central Excise dues can not be recovered from wife’s property on default of the husband’s proprietary...
![Central Excise dues can’t be recovered from Wife’s Property on default of the Husband’s Proprietary Firms: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Central-Excise-recovered-wifes-property-default-husbands-proprietary-firms-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg "Central Excise dues can’t be recovered from Wife’s Property on default of the Husband’s Proprietary Firms: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Person bearing Excise Duty, not leviable in law is entitled to claim refund subject to limitation prescribed in Section 11B: Madras HC [Read Judgment]
The Madras High court while dismissing the appeal held that the person who has borne the incidence of Excise Duty, which was not leviable in law is entitled to claim refund of the same, subject to...
![Person bearing Excise Duty, not leviable in law is entitled to claim refund subject to limitation prescribed in Section 11B: Madras HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Excise-Duty-law-claim-refund-Section-11B-Madras-High-Court-Taxscan.jpeg "Person bearing Excise Duty, not leviable in law is entitled to claim refund subject to limitation prescribed in Section 11B: Madras HC [Read Judgment]")
