Mere Omission to inform Excise Dept about Registration of Product under Insecticide Act cannot be a Wilful Misstatement of Fact, No Penalty u/s 11AC: CESTAT
In a recent judgement, the Ahmedabad bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that mere omission to inform...
![Excise Matter remanded back to Single Bench: Delhi HC allows Writ on Exhaustion of all Alternate Remedies [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Excise-Delhi-HC-Writ-Writ-Petition-taxscan.jpg "Excise Matter remanded back to Single Bench: Delhi HC allows Writ on Exhaustion of all Alternate Remedies [Read Order]")
![Charge of Clandestine Removal to be framed only on the basis of Substantial Evidence: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Charge-of-Clandestine-Removal-Substantial-Evidence-CESTAT-taxscan.jpeg "Charge of Clandestine Removal to be framed only on the basis of Substantial Evidence: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Interest of Refund: Dept cannot invoke Benefit of Extended Limitation in the absence of Fraud on the part of Taxpayer, rules CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Interest-Refund-department-Extended-Limitation-Fraud-Taxpayer-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpeg "Interest of Refund: Dept cannot invoke Benefit of Extended Limitation in the absence of Fraud on the part of Taxpayer, rules CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Bank can’t be prevented from Exercising Rights as Secured Creditor on pretext of Debt to Excise Department: SC grants Relief to Kotak Mahindra Bank [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Bank-debt-Excise-Department-Kotak-Mahindra-Bank-Taxscan.jpg "Bank can’t be prevented from Exercising Rights as Secured Creditor on pretext of Debt to Excise Department: SC grants Relief to Kotak Mahindra Bank [Read Order]")
ITAT directs BPC to produce Excise Records and permission from Excise department to set up bonded Warehouse within Factory premises
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Allahabad Bench directed the assessee, Bharat Pumps & Compressors Ltd. (BPC) to produce excise records and permission from the excise department to...
Central Excise dues can’t be recovered from Wife’s Property on default of the Husband’s Proprietary Firms: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Customs, Excises, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Ahmedabad Bench ruled that the Central Excise dues can not be recovered from wife’s property on default of the husband’s proprietary...
![Central Excise dues can’t be recovered from Wife’s Property on default of the Husband’s Proprietary Firms: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Central-Excise-recovered-wifes-property-default-husbands-proprietary-firms-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg "Central Excise dues can’t be recovered from Wife’s Property on default of the Husband’s Proprietary Firms: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Person bearing Excise Duty, not leviable in law is entitled to claim refund subject to limitation prescribed in Section 11B: Madras HC [Read Judgment]
The Madras High court while dismissing the appeal held that the person who has borne the incidence of Excise Duty, which was not leviable in law is entitled to claim refund of the same, subject to...
![Person bearing Excise Duty, not leviable in law is entitled to claim refund subject to limitation prescribed in Section 11B: Madras HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Excise-Duty-law-claim-refund-Section-11B-Madras-High-Court-Taxscan.jpeg "Person bearing Excise Duty, not leviable in law is entitled to claim refund subject to limitation prescribed in Section 11B: Madras HC [Read Judgment]")
Allegation of Clandestine Removal can’t be upheld only on the basis of Mere Entries made in certain Private Record recovered from Security: CESTAT [Read Order]
In the case of M/s, Mohit Engineering versus CCE, the Delhi bench of Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT )Â ruled that allegation of clandestine removal cannot be upheld only...
![Allegation of Clandestine Removal can’t be upheld only on the basis of Mere Entries made in certain Private Record recovered from Security: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg "Allegation of Clandestine Removal can’t be upheld only on the basis of Mere Entries made in certain Private Record recovered from Security: CESTAT [Read Order]")
