![Exemption on Customs Duty allowable to HDPE as it wont change Character of the Product Even after Modified: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Exemption-Exemption-on-Customs-Duty-Customs-Duty-HDPE-Exemption-on-Customs-Duty-allowable-to-HDPE-taxscan.jpg "Exemption on Customs Duty allowable to HDPE as it wont change Character of the Product Even after Modified: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Exemption on Customs Duty allowable to HDPE as it won't change Character of the Product Even after Modified: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that exemption on Customs Duty is allowable to...
![Post Facto Production of Certificates by Assessee Entitles to get Exemption under Exemption Notification: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Post-Facto-Production-of-Certificates-Post-Facto-Production-of-Certificates-by-Assessee-Post-Facto-Production-of-Certificates-by-Assessee-Entitles-to-get-Exemption-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg "Post Facto Production of Certificates by Assessee Entitles to get Exemption under Exemption Notification: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Exemption under Customs Notification allowable when the Export Obligation was Fulfilled: Madras HC sets aside Demand of Custom Duty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Exemption-Customs-Notification-Exemption-under-Customs-Notification-Export-Obligation-Export-Obligation-was-Fulfilled-Madras-High-Court-Demand-of-Custom-Duty-Custom-Duty-taxscan.jpg "Exemption under Customs Notification allowable when the Export Obligation was Fulfilled: Madras HC sets aside Demand of Custom Duty [Read Order]")
Reimbursement of GST delayed due to Negligence of Tax Officer: Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh HC directs to Pay 9% Interest [Read Order]
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh directed to allow 9% interest on the delayed amount of Reimbursement of Goods and Service Tax (GST) due to negligence of the tax officer. Greenland...
![Reimbursement of GST delayed due to Negligence of Tax Officer: Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh HC directs to Pay 9% Interest [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Reimbursement-of-GST-delayed-due-to-Negligence-of-Tax-Officer-Reimbursement-of-GST-GST-Jammu-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court-Interest-Taxscan.jpg "Reimbursement of GST delayed due to Negligence of Tax Officer: Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh HC directs to Pay 9% Interest [Read Order]")
Exemption u/s 11 & 12 of Income Tax Act Denied Without Prior Notice through Portal: Karnataka HC Suspends Recovery [Read Order]
The High Court of Karnataka has suspended the recovery of demand till the disposal of the appeal finding that the denial of exemption under Sections 11 and 12 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was done...
![Exemption u/s 11 & 12 of Income Tax Act Denied Without Prior Notice through Portal: Karnataka HC Suspends Recovery [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Exemption-Income-Tax-Act-Income-Tax-Act-Denied-Income-Tax-Act-Denied-Without-Prior-Notice-Prior-Notice-Portal-Karnataka-High-court-Karnataka-HC-Suspends-Recovery-Suspends-Recovery-taxscan.jpg "Exemption u/s 11 & 12 of Income Tax Act Denied Without Prior Notice through Portal: Karnataka HC Suspends Recovery [Read Order]")
Supreme Court delivers Split Verdict on Tax Holiday Exemption Applicability on Legitimate Expectation [Read Order]
The issue concerning the applicability of the doctrine of legitimate expectation, where a tax holiday/sales tax exemption granted to the appellant-manufacturer was stopped pursuant to the amendments...
![Supreme Court delivers Split Verdict on Tax Holiday Exemption Applicability on Legitimate Expectation [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Supreme-Court-Applicability-of-Tax-Exemption-legitimate-expectation-tax-holiday-exemption-applicability-Taxscan.jpg "Supreme Court delivers Split Verdict on Tax Holiday Exemption Applicability on Legitimate Expectation [Read Order]")
Tax Exemption Claim on Tractors Used in Tea Garden: Calcutta HC directs to Consider Exemption Claim under West Bengal Motor Vehicle Tax Act
The Calcutta High Court directed the Motor vehicle taxing officer to consider the tax exemption claim made by the assessee under the West Bengal Vehicle Tax Act, 1979 on tractors used in Tea Garden...
Assessee Misguided by Professional in Appellate Proceedings: ITAT remands Farmer's Exemption Claim u/s 54F [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi Bench, has recently, in an appeal filed before it, on finding out that the assesee was misguided by the professional in appellate proceedings, remanded...
![Assessee Misguided by Professional in Appellate Proceedings: ITAT remands Farmers Exemption Claim u/s 54F [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Misguided-by-Professional-in-Appellate-Proceedings-ITAT-Exemption-Claim-TAXSCAN.jpg "Assessee Misguided by Professional in Appellate Proceedings: ITAT remands Farmers Exemption Claim u/s 54F [Read Order]")
No Exemption Claimed in the Preceding Year on the Purchase of Fixed Assets: ITAT deletes addition made u/s 143(1) [Read Order]
The Bangalore Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted the addition made under section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act 1961 as no exemption was claimed in the preceding year on the...
![No Exemption Claimed in the Preceding Year on the Purchase of Fixed Assets: ITAT deletes addition made u/s 143(1) [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Exemption-No-Exemption-Preceding-Year-Purchase-of-Fixed-Assets-Fixed-Assets-ITAT-addition-Income-Tax-taxscan.jpg "No Exemption Claimed in the Preceding Year on the Purchase of Fixed Assets: ITAT deletes addition made u/s 143(1) [Read Order]")
Termination of Employment due to Misconduct is not beyond the control of Assessee: ITAT refuses Exemption u/s 10(38) to Employee
The Bangalore bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that termination of employment due to misconduct is not beyond the control of assesses and refused to allow an exemption under...
