![Company Appeal at Behest of Shareholder not Maintainable: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/21/500x300_2078905-company-appeal-shareholder-maintainabl-nclat-taxscan.webp "Company Appeal at Behest of Shareholder not Maintainable: NCLAT [Read Order]")
Company Appeal at Behest of Shareholder not Maintainable: NCLAT [Read Order]
The Chennai bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal(NCLAT) the company appeal at the behest of the shareholder would not be...
![NCLT directs Liquidation u/s 33 of IBC in absence of Resolution Plan even after Extending Time Period [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/18/250x150_2077888-nclt-nclt-directs-liquidation-section-33-of-ibc-taxscan-.webp "NCLT directs Liquidation u/s 33 of IBC in absence of Resolution Plan even after Extending Time Period [Read Order]")
![DRT Directs to Admit Application filed by Financial Creditor u/s 126 (1) of IBC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/18/250x150_2077863-drt-drt-directs-to-admit-application-application-filed-by-financial-creditor-taxscan.webp "DRT Directs to Admit Application filed by Financial Creditor u/s 126 (1) of IBC [Read Order]")
![Proceedings u/s 7 of IBC not valid when Financial Creditor already Received Pending Amount: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/01/250x150_2071830-proceedings-ibc-financial-creditor-received-pending-amount-nclat-taxscan.webp "Proceedings u/s 7 of IBC not valid when Financial Creditor already Received Pending Amount: NCLAT [Read Order]")
NCLAT Rejects Suspended Director’s Challenge to CIRP, Asserts Timely Resolution over Procedural Technicalities [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) recently dismissed an appeal filed by a suspended director who challenged the initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) on...
![NCLAT Rejects Suspended Director’s Challenge to CIRP, Asserts Timely Resolution over Procedural Technicalities [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/30/500x300_2070770-nclat.webp "NCLAT Rejects Suspended Director’s Challenge to CIRP, Asserts Timely Resolution over Procedural Technicalities [Read Order]")
Insufficiently Stamped Agreements Not a Bar to Application for CIRP u/s 7 of IBC: NCLT [Read Order]
The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Bengaluru Bench, ruled that insufficiently stamped agreement is not a bar to admission of petition filed under Section 7 of the IBC, 2016, read with Rule 4...
![Insufficiently Stamped Agreements Not a Bar to Application for CIRP u/s 7 of IBC: NCLT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Stamped-Agreements-site-img.jpg "Insufficiently Stamped Agreements Not a Bar to Application for CIRP u/s 7 of IBC: NCLT [Read Order]")
Any dispute even Pending Arbitration does not Prohibit Financial Creditors to avail remedy u/s 7 of IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal ( NCLAT ) New Delhi has ruled that a financial creditor's ability to seek redress under Section 7 of the law is not in any way restricted by a dispute that...
![Any dispute even Pending Arbitration does not Prohibit Financial Creditors to avail remedy u/s 7 of IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Pending-Arbitration-Prohibit-Financial-Creditors-Financial-Creditors-dispute-even-Pending-Arbitration-avail-remedy-section-7-of-IBC-IBC-taxscan.jpg "Any dispute even Pending Arbitration does not Prohibit Financial Creditors to avail remedy u/s 7 of IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]")
Unilateral Revocation of Guarantee does not Discharge Guarantor from his Obligations in absence of Acceptance by Creditor: NCLAT rules in favour of SBI [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) of the New Delhi bench ruled in favor of SBI, holding that when the Financial Creditor has not consented to the revocation, respondent No. 1's...
Possession Over Assets of Corporate Debtor under SARFAESI Act not a Bar to Filing Petition u/s 7 of IBC: NCLT [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of National Company Law Tribunal ( NCLT ) have held that mere possession over assets of the corporate debtor under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and...
Recall Notice issued during Cut-Off Period Specified u/s 10A doesn't Defer Date of Default If Default Occurred before Cut-Off Period: NCLAT [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), New Delhi has held that recall notice issued during cut-off period specified under section 10A of the Insolvency Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016...
