![GST Refund Claim u/s 54(3)(ii) r/w S. 56 Rejected: Calcutta HC says Not a Fit Case for Intervention [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/18/500x300_2106316-gst-refund-calcutta-high-court-goods-and-service-tax-act-gst-refund-claim-high-court-intervention-taxscan.webp "GST Refund Claim u/s 54(3)(ii) r/w S. 56 Rejected: Calcutta HC says Not a Fit Case for Intervention [Read Order]")
GST Refund Claim u/s 54(3)(ii) r/w S. 56 Rejected: Calcutta HC says Not a Fit Case for Intervention [Read Order]
The Calcutta High Court held that the writ court cannot be invoked to challenge a refund rejection order passed during the pendency of a writ...
![Deposits Collected During GST Searches Not Voluntary: Karnataka HC Rules Refund Cannot Be Denied Through Deficiency Memos [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/18/250x150_2106212-gst-refund.webp "Deposits Collected During GST Searches Not Voluntary: Karnataka HC Rules Refund Cannot Be Denied Through Deficiency Memos [Read Order]")
![Gauhati HC Grants Bail to Businessman Accused of ₹3 Crore GST Credit Misuse After 15 Days in Judicial Custody [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/25/250x150_2099804-bail-taxscan.webp "Gauhati HC Grants Bail to Businessman Accused of ₹3 Crore GST Credit Misuse After 15 Days in Judicial Custody [Read Order]")
![Reverse Charge Mechanism Not Applicable on Purchases from Unregistered Intra-State Suppliers: AAR [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/10/250x150_2095398-bank-charges-reverse-charge-mechanism-cestat-taxscan.webp "Reverse Charge Mechanism Not Applicable on Purchases from Unregistered Intra-State Suppliers: AAR [Read Order]")
![Electricity Consumption Alone Cannot Prove Suppressed Purchase and Sale: Allahabad HC quashes GST S. 74 Order [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/22/250x150_2089633-gst-electricity-transmission-distribution-charges-orissa-hc-taxscan-2.webp "Electricity Consumption Alone Cannot Prove Suppressed Purchase and Sale: Allahabad HC quashes GST S. 74 Order [Read Order]")
Section 130 of GST Act Cannot Be Invoked for Mere Stock Variations Found in Search: Supreme Court [Read Judgement]
The Supreme Court has upheld the ruling of the Allahabad High Court, holding that Section 130 of the GST (Goods and Services Tax) Act cannot be applied merely on account of stock discrepancies...
![Section 130 of GST Act Cannot Be Invoked for Mere Stock Variations Found in Search: Supreme Court [Read Judgement]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/09/500x300_2084844-section-130.webp "Section 130 of GST Act Cannot Be Invoked for Mere Stock Variations Found in Search: Supreme Court [Read Judgement]")
![Market Led Fee based Services Scheme not exigible to GST: AAR [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/01/500x300_2083103-services-scheme-gst-aar-market-led-fee-taxscan.webp "Market Led Fee based Services Scheme not exigible to GST: AAR [Read Order]")
![[BREAKING] Central Govt withdraws Proposed Income Tax Bill, 2025: Know Why](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/08/500x300_2074547-income-tax-bill-2025.webp "[BREAKING] Central Govt withdraws Proposed Income Tax Bill, 2025: Know Why")
Erroneous GST Filing by Former Auditor: Madras HC directs Udhagamandalam Municipality Commissioner to Appear Before AO [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has set aside a GST ( Goods and Services Tax ) assessment order passed under Section 63 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, against the Udhagamandalam...
![Erroneous GST Filing by Former Auditor: Madras HC directs Udhagamandalam Municipality Commissioner to Appear Before AO [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/05/500x300_2041394-madras-hc-udhagamandalam-municipality-commissioner-taxscan.webp "Erroneous GST Filing by Former Auditor: Madras HC directs Udhagamandalam Municipality Commissioner to Appear Before AO [Read Order]")
Sale of Goods at Concessional Price cannot be termed as Sham Transactions: Jharkhand HC Quashes GST Notice [Read Order]
The Jharkhand High Court ruled that a concessional sale price cannot be regarded as a sham transaction and invalidated the Goods and Service Tax (GST) notice. Loans and Interest Payment Accepted...
![Sale of Goods at Concessional Price cannot be termed as Sham Transactions: Jharkhand HC Quashes GST Notice [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Due-Diligence-for-Notices-Assam-GST-Dept-Adjudication-Adjudication-Completion-taxscan-1-1.jpg "Sale of Goods at Concessional Price cannot be termed as Sham Transactions: Jharkhand HC Quashes GST Notice [Read Order]")
Challenge against Order passed u/s 74 of CGST Act: Kerala HC Directs to appeal before GSTAT Considering Brink of Constitution [Read Order]
 In a recent petition, which is against an order passed under section 74 of the Goods and Services Tax Act (GST), 2017 , the Kerala High Court directed the petitioner to approach the second appellate...
![Challenge against Order passed u/s 74 of CGST Act: Kerala HC Directs to appeal before GSTAT Considering Brink of Constitution [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/gstat-site-img.jpg "Challenge against Order passed u/s 74 of CGST Act: Kerala HC Directs to appeal before GSTAT Considering Brink of Constitution [Read Order]")
Non Filing of GST Appeal due to Non-Constitution of GSTAT: Kerala HC allows to file Appeal in 30 Days of Constitution of Tribunal [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Kerala High Court allowed the assessee to file appeal in 30 days of constitution of tribunal as, it was found that the non filing of Goods and Service Tax (GST) appeal due to...
![Non Filing of GST Appeal due to Non-Constitution of GSTAT: Kerala HC allows to file Appeal in 30 Days of Constitution of Tribunal [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/GST-Appeal-Constitution-GSTAT-Kerala-HC-Appeal-in-30-Days-of-Constitution-of-Tribunal-taxscan.jpg "Non Filing of GST Appeal due to Non-Constitution of GSTAT: Kerala HC allows to file Appeal in 30 Days of Constitution of Tribunal [Read Order]")